DefectDojo vs Jit
Zero of fourteen models named DefectDojo first on the direct prompt; zero named Jit. DefectDojo was named by ten of the fourteen models and Jit by ten and both carry 18 labels, so the shares below are directly comparable.
Named in three categories this edition.
Named in two categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the application security posture management page.
By framing
DefectDojoFirst choices, of fourteen modelsJit
Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, DefectDojo and Jit were named in the same answer sixteen times, of the 54 answers naming DefectDojo and the 67 naming Jit. In those answers Jit took the first choice one time and DefectDojo one.
Every model, every framing
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | ||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | |||
| Perplexity Sonar | | |||||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | | | | | ||
| Mistral Small | | | ||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | |||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | ||||
| Kimi K2 | | | ||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | ||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | ||||||
| GPT-6 Luna | ||||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | |
DefectDojo Jit first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, DefectDojo on the left and Jit on the right.The direct prompt
Neither was the first choice, one was named
4 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Neither was named
10 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
What the models said about DefectDojo
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Five of six in this category shown.
“DefectDojo (open source) – Zero licensing cost, but higher effort” DeepSeek V4 Flash · scale prompt · soft negative
“DefectDojo (open source, but requires more setup)” Mistral Small · scale prompt · soft negative
“DefectDojo Community Edition – free, powerful, and integrates with 500+ tools. Great for small teams with some DevOps/DevSecOps capacity.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · budget prompt · first choice
“DefectDojo (Open Source/Community Edition) is the best overall choice because it is free forever” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
“If you have DevOps talent: Choose DefectDojo. It maximizes ROI because you aren't paying for a license” Qwen 3.7 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
What the models said about Jit
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.
“Users report integration issues—doesn't support all enterprise environments, requires extra manual setup. Also lacking customer support” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“For most mid-sized B2B companies: Start with Jit for its ease of use, built-in scanning, and developer-friendly approach.” Mistral Small · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Jit is a cloud-native, developer-first Application Security Posture Management (ASPM) and DevSecOps orchestration platform.” Muse Glimmer 30B · comparative prompt · first choice
“Jit is considered the best overall ASPM tool in 2026” Claude Haiku 4.5 · paraphrase prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.