Forcepoint Insider Threat
Standing by category
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Insider risk management | Security operations | 0% | 32 of 84 | 0% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management at 22% |
Movement
By model
How each model treated Forcepoint Insider Threat across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Looking for a unified DLP + IRM platform? → Forcepoint offers deep integration if you're in their ecosystem.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Insider risk · comparative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Forcepoint Insider Threat, over the 4 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Forcepoint Insider Threat was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
What carried it into the answer
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 3 of the 4 answers that named Forcepoint Insider Threat and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
Twenty-six of the twenty-six domain citations in answers naming Forcepoint Insider Threat came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
forcepoint.com ranks 8 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Forcepoint Insider Threat takes 0% of first choices and Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management takes 22%.ShowHide
Search and answers
In search
Google, US estimates- Its company's site
- forcepoint.com shared with Forcepoint's other products; the figures are the site's
- Organic visits to its site
- about 25,465 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 6,834 · 309 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 8,344
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This edition- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 4 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 3 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Names read as Forcepoint Insider Threat
Follow Forcepoint Insider Threat
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Forcepoint is the company behind Forcepoint Insider Threat.ShowHide
The company
On record
Company recordsClaim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Forcepoint Insider Threat's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Forcepoint Insider Threat, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Forcepoint Insider Threat by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Forcepoint Insider Threat is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Forcepoint Insider Threat, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.