IT AI Index

Index › Products › Kickidler DLP · October 2026 Edition

3 categories · Named, not ranked

Kickidler DLP

18Judge labels

2First choices

0Negative labels

7 / 14Models named it

3Categories

October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

7 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Kickidler DLP was named 7 times in Insider risk and 2 other categories, where Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management led with 22%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business19 of 77

under the label threshold

Mid-market13 of 84

under the label threshold

Enterprisenot named

No model named it for this buyer.

In insider risk · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Kickidler DLP for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Insider risk management	Security operations	2%	13 of 84	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management at 22%
Data loss prevention	Security operations	2%	11 of 89	0%	4	under 10 labels · led by Microsoft Purview DLP at 46%	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Digital risk protection	Security operations	0%	53 of 86	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by UpGuard BreachSight at 22%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Kickidler DLP yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Kickidler DLP across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	1	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.20	0	0	1	1
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	2	0	2
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	1	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	2	0	0	2

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct1 labelNone

Paraphrase2 labelsNone

Comparative2 labelsNone

Budget-constrained12 labels2

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative1 labelNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative18 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“"Kickidler is the most affordable solution for SMBs."... Need quick, managed SaaS with low per seat cost → Kickidler or Safetica from ~$6/PC/mo” Muse Glimmer 30B · DLP · budget prompt · first choice

“1-50 users, tightest budget: E-Monitor or Kickidler for per-user cost and fast setup” Muse Glimmer 30B · Insider risk · budget prompt · first choice

“Deploy CrowdStrike Falcon Pro or Kickidler DLP if your biggest risk is data loss and insider threats.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · DRP · budget prompt · alternative

“Affordable insider threat monitoring and productivity analytics bundled with DLP” DeepSeek V4 Flash · DLP · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Kickidler DLP, over the 18 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Kickidler DLP was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Safetica9 of 184Not among the top eight

CurrentWare9 of 182Not among the top eight

Microsoft Purview DLP8 of 183Not among the top eight

Nightfall AI8 of 182Not among the top eight

Netwrix Endpoint Protector6 of 180Not among the top eight

miniOrange DLP5 of 181Not among the top eight

E-Monitor4 of 182Not among the top eight

Forcepoint DLP4 of 180Not among the top eight

OpenDLP4 of 180Not among the top eight

Teramind4 of 180Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Kickidler DLP. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 18 of the 18 answers that named Kickidler DLP and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

kickidler.comYour site18

currentware.com12

spotsaas.com9

us.fitgap.com8

miniorange.com7

underdefense.com7

aimultiple.com6

fanruan.com6

forcepoint.com6

g2.com6

Sixty-seven of the eighty-five domain citations in answers naming Kickidler DLP came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

kickidler.com/reviews/top-best-data-loss-prevention-software-dlp.html18

currentware.com/blog/best-data-loss-prevention-software12

miniorange.com/blog/top-data-loss-prevention-tools7

underdefense.com/blog/dlp-solutions7

aimultiple.com/dlp-software6

fanruan.com/en/blog/top-10-data-protection-tools-for-businesses6

forcepoint.com/blog/insights/best-dlp-software6

spotsaas.com/list/data-loss-prevention--dlp--software/for-small-business6

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

kickidler.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Kickidler DLP takes 2% of first choices and Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management takes 22%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “insider risk management tool”

–

not in the top ten

Position for “insider risk management tools”

–

not in the top ten

Searches for its name, Google: 10 a month (“kickidler dlp”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 0 a month
Organic visits to its site: about 5,333 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 1,812 · 104 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 2,858
Paid Google search: No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none

Ads on GoogleDetailLess

5 ads · 3 text, 1 image, 1 video · 2 shown in the last 30 days

First shown May 2024, as TELE LINK SOFT (TLS) CY LTD, verified. Ads started 2025-11 to 2026-10: 1 in the year, 4 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 13 of 84 in insider risk

Segment leader

22%

Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management

First choices: 2 across its categories
Named in: 18 answers
Its own site cited: in 18 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on kickidler.com

985

subdomains included

Content

counted in the table below

Documentation

Product · Integration

4 · 0

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	Latest	Categories named
Glossary or explainer	28	3	2026-08-24	DLP
Comparison	10	6	2026-08-25
Blog	2	0	2023-10-13	DLP
Template or tool	2	0	2026-01-21
Webinar or virtual event	1	undated
Report or ebook	1	undated		DLP
Podcast or video	1	undated

Most recent

2026-08-25Keepactive vs time doctor comparison
2026-08-24What is productivity software glossary or explainer
2026-08-20Monitask vs keepactive comparison
2026-08-19What is workforce management glossary or explainer
2026-08-18Worktime vs keepactive comparison
2026-08-12What is workforce optimization glossary or explainer

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page kickidler.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Names read as Kickidler DLP

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Kickidler DLP; a claim can dispute any of them.

Kickidler 1

Follow Kickidler DLP

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Kickidler DLP is its own company.

ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Positioning: a comprehensive DLP suite to help businesses protect their valuable data
kickidler.com
For: businesses
kickidler.com
Price stated: DLP — user/month billed annually kickidler.com
Starting price: 8.25 kickidler.com
Free plan or trial: up to 14 days of free access kickidler.com
Certifications: GDPR requirements
Not stated on the pages read: Integrations, hosting, customers

What Kickidler DLP's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: kickidler.com, kickidler.com/features/autokick.html, kickidler.com/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Kickidler DLP's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Kickidler DLP, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Kickidler DLP by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Kickidler DLP is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Kickidler DLP, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.