Index › Security operations › DLP › Enterprise › September 2026 Edition

Data loss prevention for enterprise buyers

Asked as “data loss prevention platform”, and as “DLP tool”, on behalf of an enterprise B2B company. 42 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, twelve models each.

Standing

Microsoft Purview DLP

Clear leader

52% of first choices, clear leader.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.

Small business

Microsoft Purview DLP30%ContestedStanding →Mid-market

Microsoft Purview DLP39%ContestedStanding →Enterprise

Microsoft Purview DLP52%Clear leaderThis page

01The standing

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all twelve models, for an enterprise B2B company. Ordered by share.

ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrant

Microsoft Purview DLP16%58endorsed leader

Forcepoint DLP18%56accepted challenger

Symantec Data Loss Prevention36%55criticized challenger

Cyberhaven0%20accepted challenger

Netskope DLP8%26accepted challenger

Proofpoint Enterprise DLP14%29accepted challenger

Show the two products at 0%, ordered by negative rate

Trellix DLP36%11criticized challenger

Zscaler6%17accepted challenger

Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its vendor page.

Head to head

Microsoft Purview DLP vs CurrentWare Microsoft Purview DLP vs Safetica CurrentWare vs Safetica

Recommended versus criticized

Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.

Criticized challengerCriticized default

Negative label rate →

Accepted challengerEndorsed leader

0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative70%

Key

Microsoft Purview DLP52%

Forcepoint DLP19%

Symantec Data Loss Prevention12%

Cyberhaven5%

Netskope DLP2%

Proofpoint Enterprise DLP2%

Zscaler0%

Trellix DLP0%

02What they warned about

Four of twelve models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Grok 4.1 Fast, Mistral Small, Llama 4 Maverick, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX and MiniMax M2.5 changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.

Symantec Data Loss Prevention

36%

20 of 55 labels negative · 11 of 12 models · 7 hard negative

“Platforms to **Strongly Avoid or Approach with Extreme Caution** (Legacy/High-Risk for Large Enterprises): - **Traditional/Legacy DLP Solutions (e.g., older Symantec DLP/Broadcom” Grok 4.1 Fast, negative prompt

Forcepoint DLP

18%

10 of 56 labels negative · 9 of 12 models · 2 hard negative

“Steep Learning Curve and Resource Demands... resource-intensive, potentially slowing down endpoint devices” GLM 4.7 FlashX, negative prompt

Microsoft Purview DLP

16%

9 of 58 labels negative · 9 of 12 models

“While Microsoft Purview is excellent for organizations deeply embedded in the Microsoft 365 ecosystem, it has distinct blind spots that make it a risky choice for diverse environments.” Qwen 3.7 Flash, negative prompt

Trellix DLP

36%

4 of 11 labels negative · 4 of 12 models

“typically require custom quotes and may have modular or consumption-based pricing, which can make total cost of ownership less predictable” Mistral Small, budget prompt

03What they cite

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list: twelve of the twelve in this edition, and all six flagship models on the expanded tier.

Sites the answers cite

67 of 72 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 12 of 12 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 5 of those lists are Google grounding redirects that name no site and are left out of the counts. 917 links across 186 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page.

gartner.com

46 answers · 66 citations · 11 models

strac.io

vendor site · Strac40 answers · 55 citations · 10 models

forcepoint.com

vendor site · Forcepoint37 answers · 50 citations · 11 models

underdefense.com

vendor site · UnderDefense36 answers · 37 citations · 10 models

cyberhaven.com

vendor site · Cyberhaven25 answers · 32 citations · 8 models

currentware.com

vendor site · CurrentWare25 answers · 25 citations · 9 models

learn.g2.com

25 answers · 25 citations · 9 models

miniorange.com

vendor site · miniOrange21 answers · 21 citations · 9 models

proofpoint.com

vendor site · Proofpoint20 answers · 21 citations · 9 models

paloaltonetworks.com

vendor site · Palo Alto Networks16 answers · 19 citations · 9 models

blog.scalefusion.com

vendor site · Scalefusion15 answers · 15 citations · 6 models

fortra.com

vendor site · Fortra14 answers · 20 citations · 6 models

Pages the answers cite

The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.

gartner.com/reviews/market/data-loss-prevention

44 answers · 10 models

underdefense.com/blog/dlp-solutions

36 answers · 10 models

forcepoint.com/blog/insights/best-dlp-software

34 answers · 10 models

currentware.com/blog/best-data-loss-prevention-software

25 answers · 9 models

learn.g2.com/best-data-loss-prevention-software

25 answers · 9 models

miniorange.com/blog/top-data-loss-prevention-tools

21 answers · 9 models

strac.io/blog/top-data-loss-prevention-dlp-tools

17 answers · 8 models

proofpoint.com/us/industry-comparison/dlp

16 answers · 9 models

blog.scalefusion.com/best-dlp-solutions-for-enterprises

15 answers · 6 models

guideflow.com/blog/data-loss-prevention-software

14 answers · 8 models

04How they answered

Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.

ModelDirect“What is the best data loss prevention platform for an enterprise B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which DLP tool would you recommend to a large B2B company with thousands of employees?”Comparative“What are the top enterprise-grade data loss prevention platforms and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best data loss prevention platform for a large company that needs predictable total cost across thousands of users?”Scale-constrained“We are a 5,000 person company with SSO, SOC 2 and procurement review requirements evaluating a data loss prevention platform. What should we look at?”Negative“Which data loss prevention platforms should a large enterprise avoid or be cautious about?”

Claude Haiku 4.5Forcepoint DLP

Three alternatives

Microsoft Purview DLP, Strac, Symantec Data Loss Prevention

Forcepoint DLP, Symantec Data Loss PreventionChanged

One alternative

Microsoft Purview DLP

Forcepoint DLP, Strac

Five alternatives

Microsoft Purview DLP, Netskope DLP, Proofpoint Enterprise DLP, Symantec Data Loss Prevention, Zscaler

Fortra DLP

Two alternatives

Microsoft Purview DLP, Safetica

against: Forcepoint DLP, Symantec Data Loss Preventionno first choiceagainst: Microsoft Purview DLP, Symantec Data Loss Prevention, Varonis

GPT-5.4 miniMicrosoft Purview DLP

Two alternatives

Forcepoint DLP, Symantec Data Loss Prevention

Microsoft Purview DLPHeld

Two alternatives

Forcepoint DLP, Symantec Data Loss Prevention

Microsoft Purview DLP

Four alternatives

Forcepoint DLP, Proofpoint Enterprise DLP, Symantec Data Loss Prevention, Trellix DLP

Microsoft Purview DLP

Three alternatives

Forcepoint DLP, Netskope DLP, Zscaler

no first choiceagainst: Microsoft

Gemini 3.5 Flashno first choice

Five alternatives

CrowdStrike Falcon Data Protection, Cyberhaven, Forcepoint DLP, Microsoft Purview DLP, Netskope DLP

Cyberhaven, Microsoft Purview DLPChanged

Two alternatives

Forcepoint DLP, Netskope DLP

Cyberhaven, Microsoft Purview DLP, Netskope DLP

Two alternatives

Proofpoint Enterprise DLP, Symantec Data Loss Prevention

Microsoft Purview DLP

Four alternatives

Cyberhaven, Forcepoint DLP, Netskope DLP, Zscaler

no first choiceagainst: Google Workspace DLP, Microsoft Purview DLP, Symantec Data Loss Prevention, Trellix/McAfee

Perplexity SonarForcepoint DLP

Four alternatives

Cyberhaven, Microsoft Purview DLP, Proofpoint Enterprise DLP, Teramind

Forcepoint DLPHeld

Four alternatives

Cyberhaven, Microsoft Purview DLP, Proofpoint Enterprise DLP, Symantec Data Loss Prevention

no first choice

Seven alternatives

CrowdStrike Falcon Data Protection, Cyberhaven, Forcepoint DLP, Microsoft Purview DLP, Netskope DLP, Proofpoint Enterprise DLP, Symantec Data Loss Prevention

Microsoft Purview DLP

Two alternatives

Forcepoint DLP, Symantec Data Loss Prevention

Microsoft Purview DLP

Six alternatives

Acronis DeviceLock, Forcepoint DLP, Proofpoint Enterprise DLP, Symantec Data Loss Prevention, Teramind, Zscaler

against: Check Point DLP, Forcepoint DLP, Microsoft Purview DLP, Netwrix Endpoint Protector, Symantec Data Loss Prevention, Teramind, Trend Micro Integrated DLP

Grok 4.1 FastForcepoint DLP, Microsoft Purview DLP

Three alternatives

Netskope DLP, Proofpoint Enterprise DLP, Zscaler

Symantec Data Loss PreventionChanged

Three alternatives

Forcepoint DLP, Microsoft Purview DLP, Proofpoint Enterprise DLP

no first choiceMicrosoft Purview DLP

Three alternatives

CrowdStrike Falcon Data Protection, Fortra Digital Guardian, Zscaler

against: Forcepoint DLP, Symantec Data Loss PreventionCyberhaven

Four alternatives

CrowdStrike Falcon, Forcepoint DLP, Microsoft Purview DLP, Symantec Data Loss Prevention

against: Forcepoint DLP, Fortra DLP, Microsoft Purview DLP, Palo Alto Networks Enterprise DLP, Symantec Data Loss Prevention, Trellix XDR

Mistral SmallPalo Alto Networks Enterprise DLP, Proofpoint Enterprise DLP

Two alternatives

Forcepoint DLP, Fortra Data Security

Symantec Data Loss PreventionChanged

Two alternatives

Microsoft Purview DLP, Teramind

no first choiceagainst: Symantec Data Loss PreventionMicrosoft Purview DLPagainst: CrowdStrike, Forcepoint DLP, Trellix DLPno first choiceagainst: Google Cloud Data Loss Prevention, Nightfall AI, Proofpoint Enterprise DLP, Symantec Data Loss Prevention, Trellix Data Loss Prevention

DeepSeek V4 FlashMicrosoft Purview DLP

Three alternatives

Cyberhaven, Forcepoint DLP, Symantec Data Loss Prevention

against: Trellix DLPMicrosoft Purview DLPHeld

Four alternatives

Digital Guardian, Forcepoint DLP, Proofpoint Enterprise DLP, Symantec Data Loss Prevention

Microsoft Purview DLP

Eight alternatives

Cyberhaven, Digital Guardian, Forcepoint DLP, Fortra, Netskope DLP, Proofpoint Enterprise DLP, Symantec Data Loss Prevention, Zscaler

Microsoft Purview DLP

One alternative

Fortra Digital Guardian

against: Forcepoint DLP, Netskope DLP, Symantec Data Loss Prevention, Zscalerno first choice

Five alternatives

Forcepoint DLP, Microsoft Purview DLP, Netskope DLP, Symantec Data Loss Prevention, Zscaler

against: Microsoft Purview DLP, Symantec Data Loss Prevention, Teramind

Llama 4 Maverickno first choiceSymantec Data Loss PreventionChangedno first choiceno first choiceno first choiceagainst: CrowdStrike Falcon Data Protection, Symantec Data Loss Prevention, Trellix DLP

Qwen 3.7 FlashMicrosoft Purview DLP

Three alternatives

Forcepoint ONE, Netskope DLP, Symantec Data Loss Prevention

Microsoft Purview DLPHeld

Two alternatives

Digital Guardian, Netskope DLP

Fortra DLP

Four alternatives

Forcepoint DLP, Microsoft Purview DLP, Nightfall AI, Proofpoint Enterprise DLP

against: Symantec Data Loss PreventionMicrosoft Purview DLP

Two alternatives

Forcepoint DLP, Trellix

Microsoft Purview DLP

Four alternatives

Netskope DLP, OneTrust, Varonis, Zscaler

against: Forcepoint DLP, Microsoft Purview DLP, Symantec Data Loss Prevention

Kimi K2Microsoft Purview DLP, Netskope DLP

Two alternatives

Forcepoint DLP, Palo Alto Networks Enterprise DLP

against: Symantec Data Loss PreventionForcepoint DLPChanged

Three alternatives

Microsoft Purview DLP, Netskope DLP, Proofpoint Enterprise DLP

against: Symantec Data Loss PreventionForcepoint DLP, Microsoft Purview DLP

Three alternatives

Proofpoint Enterprise DLP, Symantec Data Loss Prevention, Trellix DLP

Microsoft Purview DLP

Two alternatives

Forcepoint DLP, Fortra DLP

no first choice

Two alternatives

Forcepoint DLP, Microsoft Purview DLP

against: Netskope DLP, Proofpoint Enterprise DLP, Symantec Data Loss Preventionagainst: Digital Guardian, Forcepoint DLP, McAfee DLP, Microsoft Purview DLP, Proofpoint Enterprise DLP, Symantec Data Loss Prevention

GLM 4.7 FlashXForcepoint DLP

Five alternatives

Cyberhaven, Microsoft Purview DLP, Nightfall AI, Strac, Symantec Data Loss Prevention

Microsoft Purview DLPChanged

Three alternatives

Digital Guardian, Forcepoint DLP, Symantec Data Loss Prevention

no first choice

Nine alternatives

CrowdStrike Falcon Data Protection, Cyberhaven, Forcepoint DLP, Microsoft Purview DLP, Netskope DLP, Nightfall AI, Proofpoint Enterprise DLP, Safetica, Trellix DLP

against: Symantec Data Loss PreventionMicrosoft Purview DLP

Two alternatives

CrowdStrike Falcon Data Protection, Forcepoint DLP

no first choiceagainst: Check Point, Cisco, Forcepoint DLP, Microsoft Purview DLP, Proofpoint Enterprise DLP, Symantec Data Loss Prevention

MiniMax M2.5Forcepoint DLP, Microsoft Purview DLPSymantec Data Loss PreventionChanged

Three alternatives

Digital Guardian, Microsoft Purview DLP, Trellix DLP

Symantec Data Loss Prevention

Five alternatives

Forcepoint DLP, Microsoft Purview DLP, Netskope DLP, Proofpoint Enterprise DLP, Safetica

against: Trellix DLPVectoredge

One alternative

Microsoft Purview DLP

no first choiceagainst: Forcepoint DLP, Microsoft Purview DLP, Symantec Data Loss Prevention

Bold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against

05The record

One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency. Full answer text is in the free responses file. Download the record

Seventy-two rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.

Prompt	Model	Version string	Time (UTC)	Searched	Sources	Latency
Direct recommendation	Claude Haiku 4.5	`claude-haiku-4-5-20251001`	2026-09-17 13:35	yes	13	10 s
Direct recommendation	GPT-5.4 mini	`gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17`	2026-09-17 12:40	yes	3	6 s
Direct recommendation	Gemini 3.5 Flash	`gemini-3.5-flash`	2026-09-17 12:22	yes	25	23 s
Direct recommendation	Perplexity Sonar	`sonar`	2026-09-17 14:13	yes	20	6 s
Direct recommendation	Grok 4.1 Fast	`spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex`	2026-09-17 12:11	yes	37	17 s
Direct recommendation	Mistral Small	`mistral/mistral-small via mistral`	2026-09-17 10:55	yes	14	9 s
Direct recommendation	DeepSeek V4 Flash	`deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks`	2026-09-17 12:20	yes	20	18 s
Direct recommendation	Llama 4 Maverick	`meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock`	2026-09-17 12:35	yes	5	3 s
Direct recommendation	Qwen 3.7 Flash	`alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba`	2026-09-17 12:02	yes	9	44 s
Direct recommendation	Kimi K2	`moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita`	2026-09-17 12:31	yes	12	35 s
Direct recommendation	GLM 4.7 FlashX	`zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai`	2026-09-17 12:29	yes	18	134 s
Direct recommendation	MiniMax M2.5	`minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax`	2026-09-17 10:13	yes	12	43 s
Paraphrase	Claude Haiku 4.5	`claude-haiku-4-5-20251001`	2026-09-17 13:42	yes	14	8 s
Paraphrase	GPT-5.4 mini	`gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17`	2026-09-17 10:37	yes	2	6 s
Paraphrase	Gemini 3.5 Flash	`gemini-3.5-flash`	2026-09-17 13:24	yes	18	26 s
Paraphrase	Perplexity Sonar	`sonar`	2026-09-17 13:15	yes	20	7 s
Paraphrase	Grok 4.1 Fast	`spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex`	2026-09-17 09:34	yes	32	14 s
Paraphrase	Mistral Small	`mistral/mistral-small via mistral`	2026-09-17 12:58	yes	5	5 s
Paraphrase	DeepSeek V4 Flash	`deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks`	2026-09-17 09:32	yes	14	17 s
Paraphrase	Llama 4 Maverick	`meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock`	2026-09-17 11:24	yes	5	3 s
Paraphrase	Qwen 3.7 Flash	`alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba`	2026-09-17 11:13	no	0	35 s
Paraphrase	Kimi K2	`moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita`	2026-09-17 11:00	yes	19	28 s
Paraphrase	GLM 4.7 FlashX	`zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai`	2026-09-17 11:10	yes	18	31 s
Paraphrase	MiniMax M2.5	`minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax`	2026-09-17 10:41	yes	5	18 s
Comparative	Claude Haiku 4.5	`claude-haiku-4-5-20251001`	2026-09-17 13:19	yes	9	10 s
Comparative	GPT-5.4 mini	`gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17`	2026-09-17 10:08	yes	6	9 s
Comparative	Gemini 3.5 Flash	`gemini-3.5-flash`	2026-09-17 13:54	yes	31	32 s
Comparative	Perplexity Sonar	`sonar`	2026-09-17 10:11	yes	20	9 s
Comparative	Grok 4.1 Fast	`spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex`	2026-09-17 09:38	yes	25	14 s
Comparative	Mistral Small	`mistral/mistral-small via mistral`	2026-09-17 13:21	yes	9	10 s
Comparative	DeepSeek V4 Flash	`deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks`	2026-09-17 12:46	yes	17	20 s
Comparative	Llama 4 Maverick	`meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock`	2026-09-17 11:12	yes	5	3 s
Comparative	Qwen 3.7 Flash	`alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba`	2026-09-17 13:29	yes	10	70 s
Comparative	Kimi K2	`moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita`	2026-09-17 13:44	yes	12	35 s
Comparative	GLM 4.7 FlashX	`zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai`	2026-09-17 13:27	yes	19	176 s
Comparative	MiniMax M2.5	`minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax`	2026-09-17 12:34	yes	14	40 s
Budget constrained	Claude Haiku 4.5	`claude-haiku-4-5-20251001`	2026-09-17 13:46	yes	9	8 s
Budget constrained	GPT-5.4 mini	`gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17`	2026-09-17 09:39	yes	4	5 s
Budget constrained	Gemini 3.5 Flash	`gemini-3.5-flash`	2026-09-17 12:08	yes	15	25 s
Budget constrained	Perplexity Sonar	`sonar`	2026-09-17 11:50	yes	20	6 s
Budget constrained	Grok 4.1 Fast	`spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex`	2026-09-17 10:55	yes	42	19 s
Budget constrained	Mistral Small	`mistral/mistral-small via mistral`	2026-09-17 09:55	yes	5	5 s
Budget constrained	DeepSeek V4 Flash	`deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks`	2026-09-17 12:46	yes	16	24 s
Budget constrained	Llama 4 Maverick	`meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock`	2026-09-17 11:14	yes	5	2 s
Budget constrained	Qwen 3.7 Flash	`alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba`	2026-09-17 12:21	no	0	40 s
Budget constrained	Kimi K2	`moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita`	2026-09-17 11:03	yes	8	23 s
Budget constrained	GLM 4.7 FlashX	`zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai`	2026-09-17 10:40	yes	14	50 s
Budget constrained	MiniMax M2.5	`minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax`	2026-09-17 12:03	yes	17	76 s
Scale constrained	Claude Haiku 4.5	`claude-haiku-4-5-20251001`	2026-09-17 10:17	yes	17	15 s
Scale constrained	GPT-5.4 mini	`gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17`	2026-09-17 11:38	yes	2	9 s
Scale constrained	Gemini 3.5 Flash	`gemini-3.5-flash`	2026-09-17 11:28	no	0	15 s
Scale constrained	Perplexity Sonar	`sonar`	2026-09-17 10:31	yes	20	13 s
Scale constrained	Grok 4.1 Fast	`spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex`	2026-09-17 13:23	yes	16	20 s
Scale constrained	Mistral Small	`mistral/mistral-small via mistral`	2026-09-17 12:46	no	0	9 s
Scale constrained	DeepSeek V4 Flash	`deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks`	2026-09-17 11:06	yes	21	28 s
Scale constrained	Llama 4 Maverick	`meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock`	2026-09-17 11:38	yes	5	4 s
Scale constrained	Qwen 3.7 Flash	`alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba`	2026-09-17 11:50	no	0	38 s
Scale constrained	Kimi K2	`moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita`	2026-09-17 11:02	yes	20	35 s
Scale constrained	GLM 4.7 FlashX	`zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai`	2026-09-17 12:40	yes	18	128 s
Scale constrained	MiniMax M2.5	`minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax`	2026-09-17 10:18	yes	9	49 s
Negative framing	Claude Haiku 4.5	`claude-haiku-4-5-20251001`	2026-09-17 10:56	yes	18	9 s
Negative framing	GPT-5.4 mini	`gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17`	2026-09-17 12:37	yes	5	8 s
Negative framing	Gemini 3.5 Flash	`gemini-3.5-flash`	2026-09-17 12:15	yes	13	20 s
Negative framing	Perplexity Sonar	`sonar`	2026-09-17 14:04	yes	18	9 s
Negative framing	Grok 4.1 Fast	`spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex`	2026-09-17 10:12	yes	24	15 s
Negative framing	Mistral Small	`mistral/mistral-small via mistral`	2026-09-17 14:12	yes	13	12 s
Negative framing	DeepSeek V4 Flash	`deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks`	2026-09-17 09:35	yes	29	25 s
Negative framing	Llama 4 Maverick	`meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock`	2026-09-17 13:22	yes	5	5 s
Negative framing	Qwen 3.7 Flash	`alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba`	2026-09-17 11:36	yes	10	47 s
Negative framing	Kimi K2	`moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita`	2026-09-17 12:44	yes	28	46 s
Negative framing	GLM 4.7 FlashX	`zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai`	2026-09-17 10:13	yes	31	207 s
Negative framing	MiniMax M2.5	`minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax`	2026-09-17 11:50	yes	25	54 s

Normalization in this category

Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.

Category-scoped readings

Broadcom/Symantec read as Symantec Data Loss Prevention

Forcepoint read as Forcepoint DLP

Microsoft Purview read as Microsoft Purview DLP

Microsoft Purview (Data Loss Prevention) read as Microsoft Purview DLP

Netskope read as Netskope DLP

Nightfall read as Nightfall AI

Proofpoint read as Proofpoint Enterprise DLP

Symantec read as Symantec Data Loss Prevention

Symantec (Broadcom) read as Symantec Data Loss Prevention

Symantec/Broadcom read as Symantec Data Loss Prevention

Zscaler Data Protection read as Zscaler

Unresolved, counted raw

Acronis DeviceLock

Fortra Data Security (formerly Digital Guardian)

Google Cloud Data Loss Prevention

Mimecast Incydr

Palo Alto Enterprise DLP

Shinobi Defense System

Trend Micro Integrated DLP

UnderDefense Managed DLP+MDR

Vectoredge

Discontinued, still offered

No shut-down product was recommended here.

Data loss prevention for enterprise buyers

By buyer segment

01The standing

Recommended versus criticized

02What they warned about

03What they cite

Sites the answers cite

Pages the answers cite

04How they answered

05The record

Normalization in this category

Also in security operations