Cyber risk quantification for small business buyers
Asked as “cyber risk quantification tool”, and as “CRQ platform”, on behalf of a small B2B company. 55 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each. Added to the October 2026 Edition on October 4, 2026; its answers are read by the distilled judge (ai-indexes-judge-qwen3-14b-run3), not the claude-opus-5 judge of the earlier categories: how the two compare.
Standing · first-choice share
9%
Contested · CISA CSET 5%
09FairCRQ05CISA CSET05UpGuard80others
9% of first choices, contested.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
The standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for a small B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Show the one product at 0%, ordered by negative rate
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
Head to head
All ten head-to-head pages: the top five products, each against each
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
F01
02
03
04R05
06
07Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative20%
Key
01FairCRQ9%
02UpGuard5%
UpGuard5%03Kovrr4%
Kovrr4%04CyberSaint CyberStrong4%
CyberSaint CyberStrong4%05RiskLens4%
06SAFE Security4%
SAFE Security4%07Axio0%
Axio0%What they warned about
Zero of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Perplexity Sonar, Grok 4.1 Fast, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX, MiniMax M2.5, GPT-6 Luna and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
RiskLens
49%
19 of 39 labels negative · 9 of 14 models · 6 hard negative
“What to Avoid: **Enterprise FAIR platforms** (full RiskLens/Safe implementations) typically require $50K–$250K+ and dedicated analyst headcount—overkill” Kimi K2, paraphrase prompt
Kovrr35%
12 of 34 labels negative · 9 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“Cyber Insurance Risk Platforms (Avoid) **Examples:** Citalid, Kovrr (for insurance-aligned use)” Kimi K2, negative prompt
SAFE Security56%
19 of 34 labels negative · 8 of 14 models · 4 hard negative
“Traditional, enterprise-grade CRQ platforms—such as **Safe Security (SAFE One)**, **Kovirr**, and **Axio**—are generally **not recommended** for B2B SMBs.” Gemini 3.5 Flash, paraphrase prompt
Axio48%
12 of 25 labels negative · 7 of 14 models · 4 hard negative
“a platform-first FAIR quant tool such as RiskLens/Safe Security SAFE or Axio360 is usually over-engineered for SMBs” Muse Glimmer 30B, negative prompt
What they cite
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list: fourteen of the fourteen in this edition, and all six flagship models on the expanded tier.
Sites the answers cite
76 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 1135 links across 236 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. None of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category.
34 answers · 61 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Kovrr33 answers · 53 citations · 13 models
33 answers · 33 citations · 10 models
32 answers · 37 citations · 12 models
vendor site · G228 answers · 49 citations · 11 models
vendor site · CyberSaint24 answers · 32 citations · 10 models
24 answers · 32 citations · 8 models
22 answers · 33 citations · 9 models
vendor site · ComplyJet22 answers · 23 citations · 9 models
vendor site · vCISO Lite21 answers · 23 citations · 10 models
vendor site · MetricStream20 answers · 27 citations · 11 models
16 answers · 21 citations · 9 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
33 answers · 10 models
32 answers · 10 models
30 answers · 12 models
22 answers · 9 models
22 answers · 7 models
21 answers · 10 models
20 answers · 10 models
20 answers · 9 models
20 answers · 10 models
15 answers · 10 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best cyber risk quantification tool”, “cyber risk quantification tool”, “cyber risk quantification tools”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FairCRQ | 9% | 0 | |||||
| UpGuard upguard.com | 5% | 192 | 2,900 | 80 | 319,457 | 25 | |
| CISA CSET | 5% | ||||||
| SAFE One safe.security SAFE Security 4%, SAFE One 2% | 5% | 115 | 2,400 | 5,496 | 1,015,372 | 12 | 8 |
| Kovrr kovrr.com | 4% | 108 | 140 | 3 | 30,981 | 3 | 4 |
| CyberSaint CyberStrong cybersaint.io | 4% | 54 | 0 | 21,504 | 1 | 9 | |
| Fair TPRM fairtprm.com | 4% | 9 | |||||
| Maxxsure | 4% | 90 | 0 | ||||
| Cyrisma cyrisma.com | 4% | 9 | |||||
| Essential CRQ | 4% |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 26 sites; 4 of them are among the sites the models cited here (cybersaint.io, kovrr.com, metricstream.com, vcso.ai). The first result for “best cyber risk quantification tool” is cybersierra.co.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best cyber risk quantification tool for a small B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which CRQ platform would you recommend to a small business that sells to other businesses?”Comparative“What are the top cyber risk quantification tools for a small team and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best cyber risk quantification tool for a small company with a tight budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 30 person company evaluating a cyber risk quantification tool. What should we look at?”Negative“Which cyber risk quantification tools should a small business avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5CISA CSET, Maxxsureno first choiceChangedKovrragainst: Qualys, Rapid7, Tenable NessusCISA CSET, NIST CSF 2.0 templatesagainst: Axio, FortifyData, Kovrr, RiskLens, SAFE Securityno first choiceagainst: FAIR, NIST 800-30, OCTAVE
Two alternatives
Axio, CyrismaTwo alternatives
CISA CSET, NIST CSF 2.0Two alternatives
OpenVAS, VulnRiskGPT-5.4 miniThreatConnect Risk QuantifierDealHubChangedagainst: Oracle CPQ, Salesforce Revenue CloudAxio360against: RiskRecon, SecurityScorecardSAFE One, SAFE Securityagainst: Kovrr, ThreatConnectno first choicenothing named
One alternative
CISA’s SMB vendor risk templates and spreadsheetsFour alternatives
HubSpot Sales Hub, PandaDoc, Pipedrive, QuoteWerksFour alternatives
Kovrr Cyber Risk Quantification Platform, MTM Cyber Risk Analytics, SAFE One, ThreatConnect Risk QuantifierOne alternative
RiskLensGemini 3.5 FlashFAIR-Uagainst: Kovrr, RiskLens, SAFE SecurityCyrismaChangedagainst: Axio, Kovirr, SAFE SecurityAxioagainst: FAIRFAIR-Uagainst: CyberSaint CyberStrong, Kovrr, SAFE SecurityDrata, Secureframe, Vantaagainst: Kovrr, SAFE Securityagainst: Archer, MetricStream, OpenFAIR spreadsheets, RiskLens, SAFE Security, ServiceNow Risk
Four alternatives
Black Kite, C-Trust, CISO Assistant, OptroFour alternatives
Alfahive, Drata, FortifyData, VantaThree alternatives
CyberSaint CyberStrong, Kovrr, SAFE SecurityFive alternatives
CISO Assistant, CyberQRM, FAIR-U Workbook for Learners, Hive Systems Quantitative Risk Assessment Tool, pyfairSix alternatives
At-Bay, CISO Assistant, Coalition, Corvus, Jira, monday servicePerplexity SonarUpGuardagainst: Axio, KPMG, SAFE SecurityvCISO LiteChangedAxio, CyberSaint CyberStrong, Kovrragainst: KPMG Cyber Risk IntelligenceCISA CSET, NIST CSF 2.0 templatesagainst: Axio, SAFE Securityno first choiceagainst: Archer, ServiceNow
One alternative
RiskLensThree alternatives
CISA CSET, Comp AI, NIST CSF 2.0 templatesOne alternative
SAFE OneOne alternative
RiskLensGrok 4.1 FastLogicGate Risk CloudPandaDocChangedagainst: Salesforce CPQLogicGate Risk Cloud Quantifyagainst: Axio, KPMG, RiskLensFairCRQagainst: Kovrr, LogicGate Risk Cloud, Resilience, RiskLens, vCISO Liteno first choiceagainst: Balbix, CyberSaint CyberStrong, Kovrr, LogicGate Risk Cloud Quantify, Resilience, RiskLens, SAFE Security, ThreatConnect Risk Quantifier
Four alternatives
Bugmetrics, Kovrr, Open FAIR tools, UpGuardThree alternatives
Odoo, Proposify, QuoteWerksSix alternatives
CyQuant, FairCRQ, Kovrr, SAFE Security, ThreatConnect Risk Quantifier, vCISO LiteTwo alternatives
Fair TPRM, OpenFAIR spreadsheetsMistral SmallLogicGate Risk Cloud, RiskLensResilienceChangedFairCRQQualys TruRisk™SAFE Securityagainst: RiskLens
Two alternatives
Kovrr, Qualys TruRisk™One alternative
UpGuardFour alternatives
Axio, LogicGate Risk Cloud Quantify, RiskLens, ZIN AdvisorThree alternatives
Axio, RiskLens, ZIN AdvisorThree alternatives
AllQuantor, Aquantix, UpGuardDeepSeek V4 FlashResilientlyagainst: Axio, Kovrr, RiskLens, SAFE SecurityCyrismaChangedagainst: Axio, KPMG, RiskLens, SAFE SecurityFairCRQagainst: Axio, RiskLens, SAFE SecurityFairCRQagainst: Axio360, Balbix, Hyperproof, RiskLens, SAFE SecurityCyberSaint CyberStrongagainst: RiskLens, X-Analyticsnothing named
Three alternatives
CyberAIQ, LogicGate Risk Cloud Quantify, vCISO LiteTwo alternatives
Black Kite, vCISO LiteOne alternative
FortifyDataFour alternatives
CISO Assistant, FAIR Excel/PPT templates, NIST PRAM, XRATORFour alternatives
Drata, Hyperproof, Kovrr, VantaLlama 4 Maverickno first choiceKovrrChangedno first choiceRiskLensCyQuantagainst: Balbix, FAIR, Kovrr, Resilience, RiskLens Cyber Risk Quantification
Two alternatives
Kovrr, LogicGate Risk CloudTwo alternatives
Kovrr, SAFE SecurityQwen 3.7 FlashUpGuardagainst: BitsightEssential CRQChangedagainst: Kovrr, RiskLensKovrragainst: Open FAIRExcel, Kantataagainst: Kratos, RiskLensno first choiceagainst: @RISK, Archer, Crystal Ball, MetricStream
Three alternatives
Black Kite, Qualys TruRisk, RiskLensThree alternatives
Customer Attuned, Deep-Insight, QualtricsTwo alternatives
Resilience, RiskLensOne alternative
RapidRiskKimi K2Fair TPRMagainst: SAFE SecurityCyberSaint CyberStrongChangedagainst: Bitsight, RiskLens, SAFE Security, SecurityScorecardKovrr, Platform-Augmented CRQagainst: SAFE SecurityCyber Risk Radar, Fair TPRMno first choiceagainst: Citalid, Kovrr, RiskLens
Two alternatives
CyberAIQ, CyberStackHubThree alternatives
Axio, FairCRQ, UpGuardThree alternatives
Axio360, FAIR-U, Open FAIRThree alternatives
C-Trust, CyberSaint CyberStrong, QuantifyMeGLM 4.7 FlashXFairCRQagainst: Bitsight, Kovrr, LogicGate Risk Cloud, SAFE Security, SecurityScorecardno first choiceChangedFairCRQXORCISMagainst: Axio, Cyence, RiskLensno first choiceagainst: FAIR
One alternative
ComplyJetNine alternatives
Axio, Cowbell Cyber, Maxxsure, Quantum Risk Discovery, Risk Cloud Quantify, RiskLens, SAFE Security, UpGuard, ZeguroTwo alternatives
FAIR Institute, Fair TPRMMiniMax M2.5UpGuardMaxxsureChangedRisk Cloud QuantifyCyber Risk RadarKovrrnothing named
Six alternatives
BitSight Security Ratings, Microsoft Defender for Cloud, Rapid7 InsightVM, RiskLens, SecurityScorecard, Tenable Vulnerability ManagementFour alternatives
C-Risk, Cyble, Essential CRQ, KovrrTwo alternatives
Axio360, FairCRQOne alternative
Scrut AutomationFour alternatives
Axio360, Bitsight, RiskLens, SAFE SecurityGPT-6 LunaDeriveagainst: FAIR Instituteno first choiceChangedAxio Quantification / Axio360, CyberSaint CyberStrongagainst: FAIR workbook / Open FAIR resourcesNinetyno first choicenothing named
Two alternatives
CyberSaint CyberStrong, LogicGate Risk Cloud QuantifyTwo alternatives
Kovrr, SAFE SecurityOne alternative
evaluatorMuse Glimmer 30BFairCRQEssential CRQ, SqualifyChangedFairCRQ, Securemetrics Cyber Risk Quantification Community Editionagainst: Axio, Balbix, RiskLens, SAFE SecurityFAIR-U for Cyber, FairCRQagainst: Axio, SAFE SecurityFAIRagainst: Axio, Axio360, RiskLens
Four alternatives
Axio, RiskLens, SAFE Security, UpGuardTwo alternatives
Kovrr, MaxxsureTwo alternatives
LogicGate Risk Cloud Quantify, OpenFAIR / FAIR-UOne alternative
RiskLensBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency. Full answer text is in the free responses file. Download the record
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-05 00:46 | yes | 9 | 8 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-05 00:30 | yes | 4 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-05 01:40 | yes | 16 | 28 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-05 00:16 | yes | 23 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-05 00:14 | yes | 20 | 10 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-05 00:20 | yes | 11 | 8 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-04 22:48 | yes | 18 | 39 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-04 22:40 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-05 01:22 | yes | 15 | 75 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-05 00:15 | yes | 20 | 35 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-05 00:33 | yes | 10 | 66 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-05 01:17 | no | 0 | 62 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-05 00:30 | yes | 4 | 22 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-05 01:31 | yes | 23 | 21 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-04 23:21 | no | 0 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-04 23:37 | yes | 5 | 10 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-05 00:57 | yes | 20 | 31 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-05 01:16 | yes | 20 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-05 00:15 | yes | 25 | 8 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-04 23:52 | yes | 23 | 9 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-04 23:08 | yes | 23 | 27 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-04 23:28 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-05 01:05 | yes | 18 | 93 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-05 01:01 | yes | 22 | 31 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-05 00:51 | yes | 24 | 24 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-05 01:41 | yes | 20 | 51 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-05 00:27 | yes | 3 | 12 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-05 00:54 | yes | 22 | 24 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-04 23:37 | yes | 17 | 10 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-05 01:06 | yes | 8 | 11 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-04 23:36 | yes | 22 | 27 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-04 23:53 | yes | 21 | 5 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-04 23:03 | yes | 17 | 12 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-05 00:04 | yes | 13 | 28 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-05 01:24 | yes | 17 | 53 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-04 23:01 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-04 22:51 | yes | 14 | 47 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-05 01:48 | yes | 21 | 28 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-05 01:18 | yes | 24 | 51 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-05 01:34 | yes | 22 | 33 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-05 00:01 | yes | 7 | 30 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-05 00:34 | yes | 17 | 31 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-04 22:13 | yes | 18 | 9 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-05 01:23 | yes | 5 | 7 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-05 00:05 | yes | 20 | 24 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-05 01:47 | yes | 21 | 2 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-05 00:19 | yes | 19 | 9 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-05 00:39 | yes | 9 | 7 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-04 23:50 | yes | 21 | 44 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-05 01:15 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-05 01:27 | no | 0 | 26 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-05 00:18 | yes | 15 | 18 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-04 22:14 | yes | 24 | 61 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-05 00:57 | yes | 10 | 15 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-05 01:27 | yes | 2 | 9 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-05 01:06 | yes | 15 | 15 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-04 23:36 | no | 0 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-05 00:35 | no | 0 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-04 22:47 | yes | 8 | 26 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-05 00:31 | yes | 17 | 4 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-05 01:22 | yes | 14 | 8 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-04 23:19 | no | 0 | 12 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-05 00:21 | yes | 23 | 62 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-04 23:01 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-04 22:38 | no | 0 | 24 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-05 00:04 | yes | 24 | 60 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-04 22:14 | yes | 22 | 80 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-04 23:00 | yes | 10 | 23 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-05 01:12 | yes | 3 | 16 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-05 01:53 | yes | 15 | 21 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-05 01:03 | yes | 15 | 15 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-04 22:32 | yes | 4 | 9 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-05 01:21 | yes | 13 | 25 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-05 00:00 | yes | 18 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-04 22:30 | yes | 19 | 9 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-04 23:56 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-05 00:47 | no | 0 | 7 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-05 00:57 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-05 01:11 | yes | 14 | 31 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-04 23:59 | yes | 20 | 28 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-04 23:27 | yes | 23 | 76 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-04 22:58 | yes | 17 | 47 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-04 22:41 | yes | 3 | 27 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-04 23:04 | yes | 21 | 25 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
CyberSaint read as CyberSaint CyberStrong
CyberSaint (CyberStrong) read as CyberSaint CyberStrong
Safe read as SAFE One
Unresolved, counted raw
@RISK
Alfahive
AllQuantor
Aquantix
Axio Quantification / Axio360
BitSight Security Ratings
Bugmetrics
CISA’s SMB vendor risk templates and spreadsheets
Corvus
Crystal Ball
Customer Attuned
CyberStackHub
Cyble CRQ
Cyence
DealHub
Deep-Insight
Derive's basic spreadsheet
FAIR Excel/PPT templates
FAIR Institute's FAIR-U
FAIR workbook / Open FAIR resources
FAIR-U Workbook for Learners (by the FAIR Institute)
FAIR-U for Cyber
Hive Systems Quantitative Risk Assessment Tool
KPMG CRQ
Kovirr
Kovrr Cyber Risk Quantification Platform
Kratos
MTM Cyber Risk Analytics
NIST 800-30
NIST CSF 2.0
NIST PRAM
Ninety
Open FAIR tools (e.g., browser-based calculators from iTechGuides or vCISO Lite bundles)
OpenFAIR / FAIR-U
Oracle CPQ
Platform-Augmented CRQ (vCISO Lite)
Proposify
Qualys CyberRisk Agent
Qualys TruRisk
Qualys TruRisk™
QuantifyMe
Quantum Risk Discovery
RapidRisk
RiskLens Cyber Risk Quantification
Salesforce CPQ
Salesforce Revenue Cloud
Securemetrics Cyber Risk Quantification Community Edition
ServiceNow Risk
XORCISM
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.