AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Products › Axio · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Ranked

Axio

98Judge labels
6First choices
18Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
7% in Cyber risk quant for enterprise buyers
Rank 4 of 116 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 16% of its 32 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Axio →
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In cyber risk quant · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Axio for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Cyber risk quantificationSecurity operations6%4 of 11616%32accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Axio yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Axio across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.501102
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash12115
Perplexity Sonar01102
Grok 4.1 Fast01124
Mistral Small01001
DeepSeek V4 Flash03115
Llama 4 Maverick01001
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K203003
GLM 4.7 FlashX01001
MiniMax M2.502002
GPT-6 Luna10001
Muse Glimmer 30B11215

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct22 labels2
Paraphrase15 labels3
Comparative27 labels2not counted in share
Budget-constrained15 labels1
Scale-constrained12 labelsNone
Negative7 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative98 labels in all, every segment counted; 6 of the 8 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“the mid-market sweet spot in 2026 is Axio, specifically Axio360” Muse Glimmer 30B · Cyber risk quant · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“I'd start with Axio for a mid-sized B2B company” GPT-6 Luna · Cyber risk quant · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Axio (Axio360) — *Best Overall for Mid-Market B2B*” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Cyber risk quant · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“These are repeatedly ranked highly for richer financial modeling, but they are typically more enterprise-oriented.” Perplexity Sonar · Cyber risk quant · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“six-figure platform costs seen for enterprise tools such as Risk Cloud Quantify, Safe Security, Axio and RiskLens” Muse Glimmer 30B · Cyber risk quant · budget prompt · soft negative
“Dropped in Forrester rankings due to weak threat/vulnerability intelligence and slow feature rollouts.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Cyber risk quant · negative prompt · soft negative
“GRC-integrated or asset-focused, but more enterprise-oriented ($75K+)” Grok 4.1 Fast · Cyber risk quant · direct prompt · soft negative
“such as Kovrr, Safe Security, and Axio) are generally out of reach” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Cyber risk quant · budget prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Axio, over the 98 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Axio was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Balbix34 of 981Not among the top eight
Bitsight17 of 980Not among the top eight
KPMG15 of 981Not among the top eight
FairCRQ10 of 988Not among the top eight
UpGuard9 of 981Not among the top eight
Black Kite9 of 980Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Axio. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 96 of the 98 answers that named Axio and are not a share of its labels.

Search and answers

axio.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Axio takes 6% of first choices and CyberSaint CyberStrong takes 25%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “cyber risk quantification tool”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “cyber risk quantification tools”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
5,400 a month (“axio”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
3,654 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 1,815 a month
Searches its site ranks for
188 · 8 in the top three
Sites linking to it
945
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
5 ads · 5 text · 0 shown in the last 30 days

First shown April 2025, as Axio Global Inc, verified.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
6%
rank 4 of 116 in cyber risk quant
Segment leader
25%
CyberSaint CyberStrong
First choices
6 across its categories
Named in
98 answers
Its own site cited
in 96 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on axio.com
471
subdomains included
Content
355
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
0 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-11 to 2026-10LatestCategories named
Blog30252026-09-14Cyber risk quant, PAM
Webinar or virtual event2802026-06-12Cyber risk quant
Report or ebook9undated
Case study7undated
Podcast or video3undated
Conference or event2undated
Template or tool202025-09-18
Comparison1undated
Glossary or explainer1undated

Most recent

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page axio.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.

Names read as Axio

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Axio; a claim can dispute any of them.
Axio (Axio360) 4

Follow Axio

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Axio is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
Cyber Risk Quantification
For
security and insurance leaders
Free plan or trial
Free Assessment axio.com/case-studies
Customers named
MLSRiverstoneCRIAlpine Capital Bank
Not stated on the pages read
Price, starting price, integrations, certifications, hosting

What Axio's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: axio.com, axio.com/case-studies. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Axio's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Axio, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Axio by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Axio is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Axio, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at axio.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.