AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Products › SAFE One · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Named, not ranked

SAFE One

17Judge labels
4First choices
0Negative labels
8 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
5 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. SAFE One was named 5 times in Cyber risk quant, where CyberSaint CyberStrong led with 25%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In cyber risk quant · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named SAFE One for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Cyber risk quantificationSecurity operations0%25 of 1160%5under 10 labels · led by CyberSaint CyberStrong at 25%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for SAFE One yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated SAFE One across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar01001
Grok 4.1 Fast00101
Mistral Small01001
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna11002
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct3 labelsNone
Paraphrase6 labels3
Comparative5 labels1not counted in share
Budget-constrained3 labels1
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative17 labels in all, every segment counted; 4 of the 5 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“FAIR program → SAFE” GPT-6 Luna · Cyber risk quant · comparative prompt · first choice
“platform-augmented CRQ solutions like vCISO Lite or Safe One are recommended” Mistral Small · Cyber risk quant · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“Safe or RiskLens-style FAIR tooling are stronger candidates” Perplexity Sonar · Cyber risk quant · direct prompt · alternative
“Consider SAFE if you have a mature security-tool stack” GPT-6 Luna · Cyber risk quant · paraphrase prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as SAFE One, over the 17 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and SAFE One was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Kovrr10 of 172Not among the top eight
Axio8 of 172Not among the top eight
CyberSaint CyberStrong6 of 173Not among the top eight
Axio3605 of 172Not among the top eight
RiskLens5 of 170Not among the top eight
Resilience2 of 171Not among the top eight
Balbix2 of 170Not among the top eight
CYE2 of 170Not among the top eight
SAFE Security2 of 170Not among the top eight
ThreatConnect Risk Quantifier2 of 170Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named SAFE One. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 17 of the 17 answers that named SAFE One and are not a share of its labels.

Search and answers

safe.security ranks 8 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, SAFE One takes 0% of first choices and CyberSaint CyberStrong takes 25%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “cyber risk quantification tool”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “cyber risk quantification tools”
8
Searches for its name, Google
1,600 a month (“safe one”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
6,239 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 1,015,372 a month
Searches its site ranks for
10,202 · 438 in the top three
Sites linking to it
2,563
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
43 ads · 35 text, 7 image, 1 video · 12 shown in the last 30 days

First shown January 2025, as SAFE SECURITIES INC., verified. Ads started 2025-11 to 2026-10: 26 in the year, 17 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
0%
rank 25 of 116 in cyber risk quant
Segment leader
25%
CyberSaint CyberStrong
First choices
4 across its categories
Named in
17 answers
Its own site cited
in 17 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on safe.security
1,080
subdomains included
Content
1,004
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
9 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-11 to 2026-10LatestCategories named
Blog51372026-10-02TPRM, Cyber risk quant
Glossary or explainer24622026-08-26TPRM, Cyber risk quant
Report or ebook6022026-09-23TPRM, Cyber risk quant
News or press5502026-05-28Cyber risk quant, TPRM
Podcast or video3302026-03-11TPRM, GRC
Webinar or virtual event2702026-05-20TPRM
Comparison2612026-09-11TPRM, EDR
Case study1912026-07-08TPRM
Template or tool1392026-09-25TPRM
Conference or event1212026-07-21TPRM, Cyber risk quant

Events in person

Upcoming
Last twelve months

As the event pages on safe.security state them, read October 5, 2026.

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page safe.security exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Of its titles that name a category, most name TPRM (110); 25 name the category the models place it in. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.

Names read as SAFE One

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as SAFE One; a claim can dispute any of them.
SAFE 3Safe 1Safe One 1

Follow SAFE One

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

SAFE One is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
Autonomous Cyber Risk Management; One platform. Continuous visibility. Measurable risk reduction.
For
Chief Risk Officers
Price stated
Flat pricing model that doesn't change with the number of vendors safe.security/solutions/cro
Integrations claimed
100 safe.security/customers
Certifications
TX-RAMPSOC 2 Type 2ISO 27001:2013SOC 3ISO 9001:2015
Customers named
Victoria’s Secret & Co.T-MobileInstacartSan Francisco Health PlanCarvanaBooz Allen HamiltonAboitiz PowerOB Hospitalist Group
Not stated on the pages read
Starting price, free plan or trial, hosting

What SAFE One's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: safe.security, safe.security/security, safe.security/solutions/cro, safe.security/customers, safe.security/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when SAFE One's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as SAFE One, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for SAFE One by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where SAFE One is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name SAFE One, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at safe.security is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.