Every category where a model named Maxxsure for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Cyber risk quantification	Security operations	6%	5 of 116	0%	9	under 10 labels · led by CyberSaint CyberStrong at 25%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Maxxsure yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Maxxsure across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	First choice	Alternative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	1	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	1
Mistral Small	1	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	2	2
Qwen 3.7 Flash	2	0	2
Kimi K2	0	1	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	1	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct8 labels3

Paraphrase4 labels2

Comparative1 labelNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative13 labels in all, every segment counted; 5 of the 5 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“CyberSaint and Maxxsure are the most frequently cited top choices for this specific segment” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Cyber risk quant · direct prompt · first choice

“Maxxsure is highly recommended for mid-market organizations” Mistral Small · Cyber risk quant · direct prompt · first choice

“Maxxsure (Top Overall Recommendation)” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Cyber risk quant · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“Offers personalized risk quantification with a proprietary algorithm” Llama 4 Maverick · Cyber risk quant · paraphrase prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Maxxsure, over the 13 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Maxxsure was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

RiskLens8 of 130Not among the top eight

Kovrr7 of 131Not among the top eight

Axio7 of 130Not among the top eight

CyberSaint CyberStrong6 of 134Not among the top eight

SAFE Security6 of 130Not among the top eight

Cyrisma2 of 131Not among the top eight

Essential CRQ2 of 131Not among the top eight

Balbix2 of 130Not among the top eight

Black Kite2 of 130Not among the top eight

C-Risk2 of 130Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Maxxsure. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 13 of the 13 answers that named Maxxsure and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

palomarr.com13

riskpublishing.com10

trycomp.ai7

cybersaint.io6

kovrr.com6

vcisolite.com6

vcso.ai6

f6s.com5

bankinfosecurity.com4

bitsight.com4

No domain is on file for Maxxsure, so its own site is not marked.

Pages cited

palomarr.com/cs/risk-quantification/top-companies11

riskpublishing.com/best-cyber-risk-quantification-platforms-compar10

trycomp.ai/hub/top-risk-management-software7

vcisolite.com/blog/crq-tools-and-platforms-20266

palomarr.com/cs/risk-quantification/insights/q1-20265

vcso.ai/learn/cyber-risk-quantification-tools-comparison5

bankinfosecurity.com/safe-axio-kpmg-dominate-cyber-risk-quantification-rankings-a-288374

bitsight.com/guides/best-cyber-risk-management-platforms-for-enterprises4

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

Where Maxxsure stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Searches for its name, Google: 90 a month (“maxxsure”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 0 a month
Its own site: No site of its own on file, so no site figures

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 5 of 116 in cyber risk quant

Segment leader

25%

CyberSaint CyberStrong

First choices: 5 across its categories
Named in: 13 answers
Its own site cited: No site on file to match

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

Follow Maxxsure

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Maxxsure's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Maxxsure, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Maxxsure by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Maxxsure is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Maxxsure, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.