AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Security operations › Cyber risk quant › SAFE Security vs Axio
Cyber risk quantification · October 2026 Edition

SAFE Security vs Axio

Two of fourteen models named SAFE Security first on the direct prompt; zero named Axio. SAFE Security was named by twelve of the fourteen models and Axio by twelve and SAFE Security carries 40 labels and Axio 32, so the shares are not directly comparable.

SAFE Security

criticized challenger

Named in one category this edition.

Axio

accepted challenger

Named in one category this edition.

First-choice share8%6%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate32%16%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#3#4A position in a field of 6; printed, not drawn.
Labels4032A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, SAFE Security reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.CyberSaint CyberStrong was named alongside these two in twelve of the fourteen direct answers. CyberSaint CyberStrong vs SAFE Security · CyberSaint CyberStrong vs Axio · Kovrr vs SAFE Security

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the cyber risk quantification page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
SAFE SecurityFirst choices, of fourteen modelsAxio
Direct203 against SAFE Security · 1 against Axio
Paraphrase232 against SAFE Security
Comparative90
Budget-constrained004 against SAFE Security · 3 against Axio
Scale-constrained00
Negative104 against SAFE Security · 1 against Axio
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, SAFE Security and Axio were named in the same answer seventy-nine times, of the 116 answers naming SAFE Security and the 98 naming Axio. In those answers Axio took the first choice three times and SAFE Security thirty-five.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where SAFE Security and Axio stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.1 Fast
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
SAFE Security Axio first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, SAFE Security on the left and Axio on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where SAFE Security and Axio stood in it.

SAFE Security first, Axio an alternative

2 of 14 modelsAxio was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
GPT-5.4 miniSAFE Security alternatives: Kovrr, ThreatConnect Risk Quantifier
GLM 4.7 FlashXCyberSaint CyberStrong, SAFE Security alternatives: Axio, Balbix, LogicGate Risk Cloud, RiskLens, UpGuard

Neither was the first choice, one was named

6 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Gemini 3.5 FlashKovrr alternatives: Axio, CyberSaint CyberStrong
DeepSeek V4 FlashCyberSaint CyberStrong alternatives: Axio, SAFE Security, vCISO Lite
Llama 4 MaverickCyberSaint CyberStrong alternatives: Axio, Maxxsure, RiskLens
Kimi K2CyberSaint CyberStrong alternatives: Axio, Maxxsure
GPT-6 LunaAxio360 alternatives: CyberSaint CyberStrong, SAFE Security
Muse Glimmer 30BCyberSaint CyberStrong alternatives: Maxxsure, RiskLens, SAFE Security

Neither was named

6 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Claude Haiku 4.5Cyrisma alternatives: Black Kite, Maxxsure, SAI360
Perplexity SonarCyberSaint CyberStrong alternatives: RiskLens, SAFE One
Grok 4.1 FastCyberSaint CyberStrong alternatives: Cyber Quant, Maxxsure, vCISO Lite
Mistral SmallCyberSaint CyberStrong, Maxxsure alternatives: RiskLens
Qwen 3.7 FlashCyberSaint CyberStrong, Maxxsure alternatives: Black Kite, RiskLens
MiniMax M2.5CyberSaint CyberStrong alternatives: Bitsight, Black Kite, Kovrr, LogicGate Risk Cloud, UpGuard

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
SAFE Security leads by four points.
SAFE Security4%#6 of 7
Axio0%#7 of 7
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
SAFE Security leads by two points.
SAFE Security8%#3 of 6
Axio6%#4 of 6
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
SAFE Security leads by forty-nine points.
SAFE Security56%#1 of 7
Axio7%#3 of 7
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about SAFE Security

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.

“such as Kovrr, Safe Security, and Axio) are generally out of reach, as their annual licensing fees frequently scale into the tens or hundreds of thousands of dollars” Gemini 3.5 Flash · budget prompt · soft negative
“Safe Security (post-RiskLens acquisition) | ⚠️ Moderate | Partially black-box methodology; auditability of underlying assumptions varies” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“Caveat: It can be expensive and may require more administrative overhead to configure properly compared to Kovrr or Axio.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · direct prompt · soft negative
“The only enterprise platform purpose-built on the FAIR (Factor Analysis of Information Risk) framework... Ranked leader in the 2025 Forrester CRQ Wave” Kimi K2 · comparative prompt · first choice
“Safe Security leads the 2025 Forrester CRQ Wave after acquiring RiskLens, consolidating FAIR-native quantification with real-world data integration.” Mistral Small · comparative prompt · first choice
“Cloud-first enterprises that want CRQ wired into daily security operations lean Safe Security; its integration depth is the widest in the category.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · comparative prompt · first choice

What the models said about Axio

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.

“six-figure platform costs seen for enterprise tools such as Risk Cloud Quantify, Safe Security, Axio and RiskLens” Muse Glimmer 30B · budget prompt · soft negative
“Dropped in Forrester rankings due to weak threat/vulnerability intelligence and slow feature rollouts.” Grok 4.1 Fast · negative prompt · soft negative
“GRC-integrated or asset-focused, but more enterprise-oriented ($75K+)” Grok 4.1 Fast · direct prompt · soft negative
“the mid-market sweet spot in 2026 is Axio, specifically Axio360” Muse Glimmer 30B · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“I'd start with Axio for a mid-sized B2B company” GPT-6 Luna · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Axio (Axio360) — *Best Overall for Mid-Market B2B*” Gemini 3.5 Flash · paraphrase prompt · first choice
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.