Every category where a model named CyberSaint CyberStrong for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Cyber risk quantification	Security operations	25%	1 of 116	0%	26	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for CyberSaint CyberStrong yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated CyberSaint CyberStrong across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	1	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	2	1	3
Perplexity Sonar	2	0	0	2
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	1	1	3
Mistral Small	1	0	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	0	1	2
Llama 4 Maverick	1	0	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	0	0	1
Kimi K2	2	1	0	3
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	1	0	2
MiniMax M2.5	2	1	0	3
GPT-6 Luna	0	3	0	3
Muse Glimmer 30B	1	0	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct19 labels10

Paraphrase5 labels3

Comparative14 labels2not counted in share

Budget-constrained5 labelsNone

Scale-constrained6 labels2

Negative5 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative54 labels in all, every segment counted; 15 of the 17 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Often highlighted as the most accessible CRQ platform for mid-market organizations, with pricing starting around $30,000 annually.” MiniMax M2.5 · Cyber risk quant · direct prompt · first choice

“CyberSaint is the most accessible CRQ platform for mid-market organizations, with pricing starting around $30,000 annually.” Muse Glimmer 30B · Cyber risk quant · direct prompt · first choice

“I'd suggest starting with CyberSaint if budget is a primary concern and you want an accessible entry point” MiniMax M2.5 · Cyber risk quant · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“CyberSaint and Maxxsure are the most frequently cited top choices for this specific segment” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Cyber risk quant · direct prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as CyberSaint CyberStrong, over the 54 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and CyberSaint CyberStrong was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Axio35 of 542Compare →

SAFE Security34 of 5413Compare →

Kovrr34 of 544Compare →

RiskLens28 of 542Compare →

Balbix16 of 542Not among the top eight

Bitsight9 of 541Not among the top eight

SAFE One6 of 541Not among the top eight

Maxxsure6 of 540Not among the top eight

KPMG5 of 540Not among the top eight

Resilience5 of 540Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named CyberSaint CyberStrong. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 54 of the 54 answers that named CyberSaint CyberStrong and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

riskpublishing.com36

cybersaint.ioYour site32

kovrr.com30

trycomp.ai25

g2.com22

f6s.com19

vcso.ai19

worldmetrics.org19

bitsight.com18

vcisolite.com18

206 of the 238 domain citations in answers naming CyberSaint CyberStrong came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

riskpublishing.com/best-cyber-risk-quantification-platforms-compar34

trycomp.ai/hub/top-risk-management-software25

kovrr.com/blog-post/the-best-cyber-risk-quantification-tools-in-2026-a-buyers-guide19

vcisolite.com/blog/crq-tools-and-platforms-202618

vcso.ai/learn/cyber-risk-quantification-tools-comparison18

f6s.com/software/category/cyber-risk-quantification17

g2.com/categories/cyber-risk-quantification-crq-tools16

palomarr.com/cs/risk-quantification/top-companies15

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

Where CyberSaint CyberStrong stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “cyber risk quantification tool”

–

not in the top ten

Position for “cyber risk quantification tools”

Searches for its name, Google: not counted (“cybersaint cyberstrong”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 0 a month
Organic visits to its site: about 21,504 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 3,079 · 183 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 1,218
Paid Google search: No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none

Ads on GoogleDetailLess

13 ads · 11 text, 1 image, 1 video · 1 shown in the last 30 days

First shown May 2023, as CyberSaint, Inc., verified. Ads started 2025-11 to 2026-10: 3 in the year, 10 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

25%

rank 1 of 116 in cyber risk quant

First choices

across its categories

Named in: 54 answers
Its own site cited: in 54 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on cybersaint.io

791

subdomains included

Content

696

counted in the table below

Documentation

Product · Integration

1 · 3

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	Latest	Categories named
Blog	390	undated		GRC, Compliance automation
Glossary or explainer	186	2	2026-08-26	GRC, Compliance automation
News or press	87	undated		GRC, TPRM
Conference or event	12	undated
Case study	11	undated
Comparison	6	1	2026-08-24
Template or tool	4	undated

Most recent

2026-08-26What is iso 42001 certification glossary or explainer
2026-08-24Kpi vs kri which risk management indicator should you prioritize comparison
2026-08-19What is the owasp top 10 for llm and agentic ai glossary or explainer
2026-05-28What is graph neural network gnn glossary or explainer
2026-05-28What is a large language model llm glossary or explainer
2026-05-28What is frontier ai glossary or explainer

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page cybersaint.io exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Of its titles that name a category, most name GRC (20); 0 name the category the models place it in. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Names read as CyberSaint CyberStrong

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as CyberSaint CyberStrong; a claim can dispute any of them.

CyberSaint 16CyberSaint (CyberStrong) 4Cybersaint 2CyberSaint (CyberStrong Platform) 1CyberSaint (CyberStrong platform) 1

Follow CyberSaint CyberStrong

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

CyberSaint CyberStrong is its own company.

ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Positioning: The CyberStrong Platform enables enterprises to assess, measure, remediate, and communicate their cyber risk posture.
cybersaint.io
For: enterprises
cybersaint.io
Free plan or trial: Free Cyber Risk Analysis cybersaint.io
Customers named: IBMGeneracOtsukaSunrunBILL.comLargest Payment Processor in USBoston CollegeNational Healthcare & Hospital Network
Not stated on the pages read: Price, starting price, integrations, certifications, hosting

What CyberSaint CyberStrong's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: cybersaint.io, cybersaint.io/cybersecurity/forrester/grc/compliance, cybersaint.io/cybersecurity/forrester/grc/platform-and-tools, cybersaint.io/cybersecurity/cyberstrong/customer-stories, cybersaint.io/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when CyberSaint CyberStrong's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as CyberSaint CyberStrong, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for CyberSaint CyberStrong by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where CyberSaint CyberStrong is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name CyberSaint CyberStrong, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.

Badges

Wins only: a badge exists where CyberSaint CyberStrong is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.

ShowHide

AI models recommend CyberSaint CyberStrong first in Cyber risk quantification this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.

Wide · 320 × 104 Website, beside other badges

Show the code

<a href="https://it-ai-index.com/security/cyber-risk-quantification/"><img src="https://it-ai-index.com/badges/2026-10/cybersaint-cyberstrong--cyber-risk-quantification-wide.svg" alt="AI models' first choice in Cyber risk quantification, October 2026 Edition, IT AI Recommendation Index" width="320" height="104"></a>

Copy the code as it is. The link is part of the badge: it points at the Cyber risk quantification standing, where the claim can be checked.

Square · 240 × 240 LinkedIn, slides

Show the code

<a href="https://it-ai-index.com/security/cyber-risk-quantification/"><img src="https://it-ai-index.com/badges/2026-10/cybersaint-cyberstrong--cyber-risk-quantification-square.svg" alt="AI models' first choice in Cyber risk quantification, October 2026 Edition, IT AI Recommendation Index" width="240" height="240"></a>

Copy the code as it is. The link is part of the badge: it points at the Cyber risk quantification standing, where the claim can be checked.

Compact · 200 × 56 Email signature, footer

Show the code

<a href="https://it-ai-index.com/security/cyber-risk-quantification/"><img src="https://it-ai-index.com/badges/2026-10/cybersaint-cyberstrong--cyber-risk-quantification-compact.svg" alt="AI models' first choice in Cyber risk quantification, October 2026 Edition, IT AI Recommendation Index" width="200" height="56"></a>

Copy the code as it is. The link is part of the badge: it points at the Cyber risk quantification standing, where the claim can be checked.

Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.