Infrastructure monitoring for small business buyers
Asked as “infrastructure monitoring tool”, and as “server and cloud infrastructure monitoring solution”, on behalf of a small B2B company. 56 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
16%
Contested · Paessler PRTG 14%
16Site24x714Paessler PRTG14Zabbix55others
16% of first choices, contested.
Since September 2026▼−6Since September 2026: 22% → 16%, −6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Site24x7 held the lead, −6 points on 22%, inside the 11-point floor.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small business
Site24x716%Contested▼−6Since September 2026: 22% → 16%, −6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.This pageMid-market
Datadog28%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since September 2026: Datadog (27%) replaces Site24x7 (24% then, 9% now), 18 points clear, past the 11-point floor.Standing →EnterpriseDatadog41%Clear leader▲+7Since September 2026: 35% → 42%, +7 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →
Site24x716%Contested▼−6Since September 2026: 22% → 16%, −6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.This pageMid-marketDatadog28%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since September 2026: Datadog (27%) replaces Site24x7 (24% then, 9% now), 18 points clear, past the 11-point floor.Standing →EnterpriseDatadog41%Clear leader▲+7Since September 2026: 35% → 42%, +7 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →The standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for a small B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
01Site24x716%0%35accepted challenger▼−6Since September 2026: 22% → 16%, −6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.22% → 16%
Site24x716%0%35accepted challenger▼−6Since September 2026: 22% → 16%, −6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.22% → 16%02
Paessler PRTG14%11%36accepted challenger▲+8Since September 2026: 6% → 14%, +8 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.6% → 14%
Paessler PRTG14%11%36accepted challenger▲+8Since September 2026: 6% → 14%, +8 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.6% → 14%03
Zabbix14%26%58criticized challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 14% → 16%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.14% → 16%
Zabbix14%26%58criticized challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 14% → 16%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.14% → 16%04
Grafana12%15%34accepted challenger▲+4Since September 2026: 6% → 10%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.6% → 10%
Grafana12%15%34accepted challenger▲+4Since September 2026: 6% → 10%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.6% → 10%05
Netdata7%0%26accepted challenger▼−2Since September 2026: 10% → 8%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.10% → 8%
Netdata7%0%26accepted challenger▼−2Since September 2026: 10% → 8%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.10% → 8%06
UptimeRobot5%0%24accepted challenger▲+4Since September 2026: 2% → 6%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 6%
UptimeRobot5%0%24accepted challenger▲+4Since September 2026: 2% → 6%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 6%07
New Relic5%22%46accepted challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 4% → 6%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.4% → 6%
New Relic5%22%46accepted challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 4% → 6%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.4% → 6%08Datadog5%53%59criticized challenger▼−4Since September 2026: 10% → 6%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.10% → 6%
Datadog5%53%59criticized challenger▼−4Since September 2026: 10% → 6%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.10% → 6%09
Prometheus4%33%21criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 4% → 4%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.4% → 4%
Prometheus4%33%21criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 4% → 4%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.4% → 4%10
Prometheus + Grafana2%23%31accepted challenger▼−2Since September 2026: 4% → 2%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.4% → 2%
Prometheus + Grafana2%23%31accepted challenger▼−2Since September 2026: 4% → 2%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.4% → 2%11
ManageEngine OpManager2%0%14accepted challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 2%
ManageEngine OpManager2%0%14accepted challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 2%Show the three products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
14
Dynatrace0%81%21criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
Dynatrace0%81%21criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%13
Nagios0%62%24criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
Nagios0%62%24criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%12
SigNoz0%0%11accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
SigNoz0%0%11accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each
Datadog vs Site24x7Datadog vs GrafanaDatadog vs Paessler PRTGDatadog vs PrometheusZabbix vs New RelicZabbix vs ManageEngine OpManagerZabbix vs Site24x7Zabbix vs GrafanaZabbix vs Paessler PRTGZabbix vs PrometheusNew Relic vs ManageEngine OpManagerNew Relic vs Site24x7New Relic vs GrafanaNew Relic vs Paessler PRTGNew Relic vs PrometheusManageEngine OpManager vs Site24x7ManageEngine OpManager vs GrafanaManageEngine OpManager vs Paessler PRTGManageEngine OpManager vs PrometheusSite24x7 vs GrafanaSite24x7 vs Paessler PRTGSite24x7 vs PrometheusGrafana vs Paessler PRTGGrafana vs PrometheusPaessler PRTG vs Prometheus
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
0102030405060708091011121314Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative30%
Key
01Site24x716%
Site24x716%02Paessler PRTG14%
Paessler PRTG14%03Zabbix14%
Zabbix14%04Grafana12%
Grafana12%05Netdata7%
Netdata7%06UptimeRobot5%
UptimeRobot5%07New Relic5%
New Relic5%08Datadog5%
Datadog5%09Prometheus4%
Prometheus4%10Prometheus + Grafana2%
Prometheus + Grafana2%11ManageEngine OpManager2%
ManageEngine OpManager2%12SigNoz0%
SigNoz0%13Nagios0%
Nagios0%14Dynatrace0%
Dynatrace0%What they warned about
Four of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Perplexity Sonar, Grok 4.1 Fast, Mistral Small, Llama 4 Maverick, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX, MiniMax M2.5 and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Datadog53%
31 of 59 labels negative · 13 of 14 models · 12 hard negative
“Avoid per-host SaaS observability at scale unless you have clear ROI and headcount to manage it, i.e., Datadog, New Relic, Dynatrace, Instana.” Muse Glimmer 30B, negative prompt
Zabbix26%
15 of 58 labels negative · 12 of 14 models · 4 hard negative
“While free, Zabbix is often described as "fiddly" and requires a high time investment” Mistral Small, negative prompt
Dynatrace81%
17 of 21 labels negative · 11 of 14 models · 9 hard negative
“Tools like **Splunk Enterprise**, **Dynatrace**, or **IBM Tivoli** ... **Why to avoid:** They are often overkill for a small business.” Qwen 3.7 Flash, negative prompt
Nagios62%
15 of 24 labels negative · 10 of 14 models · 6 hard negative
“Why to avoid/be cautious: High Hidden Total Cost of Ownership (TCO): Setting up Nagios or Zabbix requires manual configuration” Gemini 3.5 Flash, negative prompt
What they cite
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list: fourteen of the fourteen in this edition, and all six flagship models on the expanded tier.
Sites the answers cite
73 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 948 links across 185 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 14 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.
vendor site · Motadata36 answers · 42 citations · 10 models
32 answers · 43 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Netdata30 answers · 37 citations · 12 models
vendor site · UptimeRobot27 answers · 36 citations · 10 models
vendor site · New Relic27 answers · 35 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Uptrace26 answers · 29 citations · 10 models
vendor site · G225 answers · 33 citations · 11 models
vendor site · SigNoz23 answers · 26 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Dash022 answers · 22 citations · 11 models
19 answers · 20 citations · 11 models
vendor site · G219 answers · 20 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Sematext18 answers · 18 citations · 10 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
32 answers · 10 models
26 answers · 11 models
24 answers · 10 models
22 answers · 9 models
21 answers · 11 models
21 answers · 9 models
20 answers · 9 models
19 answers · 11 models
19 answers · 10 models
17 answers · 9 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best infrastructure monitoring tool”, “infrastructure monitoring tool”, “infrastructure monitoring tools”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Site24x7 site24x7.com | 16% | 214 | 1,300 | 61 | 174,542 | $522 | 120 | |
| Paessler PRTG paessler.com | 14% | 80 | 390 | 14 | 107,237 | $12,945 | 120 | |
| Zabbix zabbix.com | 14% | 279 | 12,100 | 992 | 18,850 | 3 | ||
| Grafana grafana.com Grafana 12%, Prometheus + Grafana 2% | 14% | 247 | 40,500 | 2,627 | 84,520 | 116 | ||
| Netdata netdata.cloud | 7% | 91 | 2,900 | 91 | 13,040 | 1 | 2 | |
| UptimeRobot uptimerobot.com | 5% | 182 | 6,600 | 49 | 287,442 | 28 | ||
| New Relic newrelic.com | 5% | 629 | 14,800 | 843 | 83,276 | $412 | 89 | |
| Better Stack betterstack.com | 5% | 285 | 1,600 | 1,017 | 41,811 | 119 | ||
| Datadog datadoghq.com | 5% | 585 | 74,000 | 3,541 | 159,408 | $633 | 120 | 5 |
| Prometheus prometheus.io | 4% | 257 | 246,000 | 11,819 | 22,996 |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 20 sites; 2 of them are among the sites the models cited here (gartsolutions.com, netdata.cloud). The first result for “best infrastructure monitoring tool” is hyperping.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best infrastructure monitoring tool for a small B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which server and cloud infrastructure monitoring solution would you recommend to a small business that sells to other businesses?”Comparative“What are the top infrastructure monitoring tools for a small team and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best infrastructure monitoring tool for a small company with a tight budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 30 person company evaluating an infrastructure monitoring tool. What should we look at?”Negative“Which infrastructure monitoring tools should a small business avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5Datadogagainst: CloudWatch, Zabbixno first choiceChangedNew Relicagainst: DatadogGrafana, Prometheusno first choiceagainst: Datadog, Splunk
Two alternatives
New Relic, Prometheus + GrafanaFour alternatives
Grafana, Prometheus, SigNoz, Site24x7Five alternatives
Better Stack, Nagios, Netdata, New Relic, ZabbixGPT-5.4 miniGrafanaNew RelicChangedDatadogCheckmk Communityagainst: Datadogno first choicenothing named
Two alternatives
Datadog, New RelicTwo alternatives
Datadog, Site24x7Five alternatives
Checkmk, Grafana, New Relic, Prometheus, ZabbixThree alternatives
Grafana, Netdata, PrometheusGemini 3.5 FlashBetter Stackagainst: DatadogBetter StackHeldagainst: Datadog, Prometheus + Grafana, ZabbixBetter Stackagainst: DatadogNetdataagainst: Datadog, PingdomBetter Stack, Grafanaagainst: Datadog, Grafana, Prometheusagainst: Broadcom DX NetOps, Datadog, Dynatrace, ELK Stack, Grafana, Nagios, New Relic, Prometheus, SolarWinds NPM, Splunk, Zabbix
Three alternatives
Grafana, New Relic, Site24x7Two alternatives
New Relic, Site24x7Three alternatives
Grafana, Netdata, New RelicFive alternatives
Checkmk Raw, Grafana, Site24x7, Uptime Kuma, ZabbixThree alternatives
Netdata, New Relic, SentryPerplexity SonarPaessler PRTGSite24x7ChangedPaessler PRTGZabbixagainst: Paessler PRTGno first choiceagainst: Dynatrace, Grafana, Nagios, Prometheus, Splunk, Zabbix
Three alternatives
Site24x7, UptimeRobot, ZabbixOne alternative
ZabbixSeven alternatives
Better Stack, Datadog, Netdata, New Relic, Prometheus + Grafana, Site24x7, ZabbixTwo alternatives
Site24x7, UptimeRobotGrok 4.1 FastGrafana, PrometheusSite24x7Changedagainst: Datadog, New RelicPrometheus + GrafanaNetdataagainst: DatadogGrafanaagainst: Datadogagainst: Datadog, Dynatrace, Nagios, New Relic, Paessler PRTG, SolarWinds, Zabbix
Five alternatives
Datadog, New Relic, Paessler PRTG, Site24x7, ZabbixThree alternatives
ManageEngine OpManager, Paessler PRTG, ZabbixFive alternatives
Datadog, Netdata, New Relic, Site24x7, ZabbixThree alternatives
Prometheus + Grafana, Site24x7, ZabbixTwo alternatives
CloudWatch, PrometheusMistral SmallNetdata, Paessler PRTGDatadog, New RelicChangedPrometheus + Grafana, Zabbixagainst: NagiosUptimeRobot, Zabbixagainst: Nagiosno first choiceagainst: AppDynamics, Datadog, Dynatrace, Grafana, Prometheus + Grafana, SolarWindsagainst: Datadog, Dynatrace, Nagios, Zabbix
Two alternatives
Datadog Network Performance Monitoring, NinjaOneTwo alternatives
Grafana, UptimeRobotThree alternatives
Checkmk, Datadog, Site24x7Two alternatives
Grafana, PrometheusDeepSeek V4 FlashPaessler PRTGagainst: Datadog, NagiosPaessler PRTGHeldagainst: Datadog, Dynatrace, LogicMonitor, Prometheus + Grafana, ZabbixNetdata, UptimeRobotagainst: Datadog, ZabbixZabbixno first choiceagainst: Datadog, Dynatrace, Nagios, New Relic, Prometheus + Grafana, Splunk
Three alternatives
New Relic, Site24x7, ZabbixOne alternative
UptimeRobotSix alternatives
Grafana, New Relic, Paessler PRTG, Prometheus + Grafana, SigmaOS / SigNoz, Site24x7Four alternatives
ManageEngine OpManager, Paessler PRTG Network Monitor, Prometheus + Grafana, UptimeRobotLlama 4 MaverickNetdataagainst: PrometheusSite24x7Changedno first choiceUptimeRobotno first choiceagainst: Datadog, Dynatrace, LogicMonitor, New Relic, Splunk Observability Cloud
One alternative
Paessler PRTGFour alternatives
Datadog, IBM Instana, LogicMonitor, New RelicTwo alternatives
Atera, SematextQwen 3.7 FlashSite24x7Site24x7Heldagainst: PrometheusDatadog, Netdataagainst: New Relic, Prometheus + GrafanaZabbixDatadog, New Relicagainst: Grafana, Prometheusagainst: Cisco Catalyst Center, Datadog, Dynatrace, IBM Tivoli, Nagios, Prometheus, SolarWinds Network Performance Monitor, Splunk, Zabbix
Three alternatives
ManageEngine OpManager, Prometheus + Grafana, ZabbixThree alternatives
Datadog, Uptime Kuma, ZabbixFour alternatives
Grafana, SigNoz, UptimeRobot, ZabbixFour alternatives
Grafana, Prometheus, Site24x7, Uptime KumaThree alternatives
Dynatrace, Grafana, ZabbixKimi K2Paessler PRTGagainst: Datadog, New RelicSite24x7Changedagainst: Datadog, PingdomGrafana + Prometheusagainst: Datadog, Nagios, Paessler PRTGUptime Kuma, Zabbixno first choiceagainst: Datadog, Dynatraceagainst: Datadog, Dynatrace, Microsoft SCOM, Nagios, SolarWinds NPM, Splunk, Zabbix
Three alternatives
Site24x7, UptimeRobot, ZabbixTwo alternatives
Paessler PRTG, UptimeRobotFive alternatives
Netdata, New Relic, Site24x7, UptimeRobot, ZabbixTwo alternatives
Prometheus + Grafana, Site24x7Four alternatives
Netdata, Paessler PRTG, SigNoz, ZabbixGLM 4.7 FlashXSite24x7, Zabbixagainst: DynatracePaessler PRTGChangedDatadog, Site24x7against: Dynatrace, Nagios, ZabbixZabbixno first choiceagainst: ActivTrak, CurrentWare, Datadog, Dynatrace, Elastic Stack, Hubstaff, IBM Instana, Nagios, New Relic, Paessler PRTG, SolarWinds Network Performance Monitor, Splunk, Teramind, Time Doctor, Zabbix
Five alternatives
Amazon CloudWatch, Datadog, ManageEngine OpManager, New Relic, Prometheus + GrafanaThree alternatives
Datadog, Prometheus + Grafana, Site24x7Three alternatives
New Relic, Paessler PRTG, Prometheus + GrafanaFive alternatives
Cacti, Icinga, Nagios, Prometheus + Grafana, Sensu GoMiniMax M2.5Paessler PRTG, Site24x7ManageEngine OpManager, ZabbixChangedNetdata, New RelicPrometheus + Grafana, UptimeRobotno first choiceagainst: Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic, Zabbix
Four alternatives
Datadog, Netdata, Prometheus + Grafana, ZabbixTwo alternatives
Datadog, Prometheus + GrafanaOne alternative
Prometheus + GrafanaTwo alternatives
New Relic, ZabbixNine alternatives
Amazon CloudWatch, Datadog, Dynatrace, Grafana Stack, Paessler PRTG, Progress WhatsUp Gold, Prometheus, SolarWinds, ZabbixGPT-6 LunaGrafanaGrafanaHeldGrafanaCheckmk Communityno first choiceagainst: Datadog, Nagios, Prometheus + Grafana, Zabbix
One alternative
New RelicThree alternatives
Azure Monitor, CloudWatch, DatadogFour alternatives
Better Stack, Checkmk Community, Datadog, New RelicThree alternatives
Grafana, Prometheus, ZabbixMuse Glimmer 30BPaessler PRTGLogicMonitorChangedSite24x7against: Datadog, DynatraceSite24x7no first choiceagainst: Datadog, Dynatrace, ELK, Elastic Stack, IBM Instana, Nagios, New Relic, Prometheus + Grafana, Zabbix
Three alternatives
Grafana, ManageEngine OpManager, PrometheusThree alternatives
Netdata, Paessler PRTG, Site24x7Four alternatives
ManageEngine OpManager, Netdata, Prometheus + Grafana, ZabbixSeven alternatives
Grafana, ManageEngine OpManager, Nagios, Netdata, Prometheus, UptimeRobot, ZabbixBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency. Full answer text is in the free responses file. Download the record
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 09:26 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 11:10 | yes | 3 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 10:30 | yes | 14 | 22 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 11:41 | yes | 19 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 10:16 | yes | 19 | 7 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 12:23 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 07:53 | yes | 13 | 24 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 11:44 | yes | 10 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 12:39 | yes | 9 | 35 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 11:56 | yes | 14 | 16 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 09:11 | yes | 17 | 52 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 10:10 | yes | 14 | 72 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 13:16 | yes | 2 | 13 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 12:28 | yes | 23 | 30 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 12:10 | no | 0 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 13:17 | yes | 4 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 13:07 | yes | 18 | 24 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 13:23 | yes | 20 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 09:42 | yes | 24 | 6 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 12:33 | no | 0 | 2 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 08:53 | yes | 25 | 22 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 08:10 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 12:43 | no | 0 | 40 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 13:50 | yes | 20 | 21 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 12:57 | yes | 25 | 25 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 13:22 | yes | 13 | 26 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 09:39 | yes | 3 | 19 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 09:29 | yes | 13 | 18 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 12:11 | yes | 9 | 8 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 09:56 | yes | 6 | 10 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 13:02 | yes | 17 | 23 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 09:09 | yes | 20 | 4 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 09:01 | yes | 21 | 10 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 09:39 | yes | 13 | 10 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 10:04 | yes | 23 | 55 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 11:32 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 10:08 | yes | 10 | 35 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 10:06 | yes | 14 | 35 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 09:09 | yes | 21 | 102 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 13:26 | yes | 13 | 31 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 12:34 | yes | 5 | 16 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 09:02 | yes | 11 | 29 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 13:10 | yes | 10 | 9 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 12:34 | yes | 4 | 6 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 13:05 | yes | 13 | 25 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 11:55 | yes | 20 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 10:28 | yes | 18 | 8 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 10:18 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 13:20 | yes | 19 | 32 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 12:13 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 13:34 | no | 0 | 33 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 12:21 | yes | 14 | 18 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 09:56 | yes | 9 | 91 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 09:09 | yes | 5 | 30 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 10:05 | yes | 4 | 11 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 08:19 | yes | 23 | 39 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 08:50 | no | 0 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 08:20 | no | 0 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 10:34 | yes | 8 | 24 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 07:38 | yes | 19 | 4 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 13:27 | no | 0 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 10:17 | no | 0 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 13:11 | yes | 20 | 52 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 09:09 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 08:06 | yes | 5 | 23 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 13:52 | yes | 14 | 28 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 10:57 | yes | 14 | 19 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 12:56 | yes | 5 | 18 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 12:22 | yes | 4 | 16 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 11:12 | no | 0 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 09:55 | yes | 19 | 9 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 09:46 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 07:26 | yes | 9 | 23 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 13:18 | yes | 19 | 3 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 08:48 | yes | 23 | 7 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 11:41 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 08:26 | yes | 24 | 60 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 10:26 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 07:56 | yes | 8 | 29 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 07:44 | yes | 24 | 26 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 13:01 | yes | 22 | 187 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 09:20 | yes | 10 | 36 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 12:07 | yes | 4 | 17 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 11:21 | yes | 13 | 30 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
AWS CloudWatch read as Amazon CloudWatch
Grafana Cloud read as Grafana
Unresolved, counted raw
Broadcom DX NetOps
Checkmk Community
Librato
Sensu Go
SigmaOS / SigNoz
Victoria Metrics
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.