Small business▼−6Since September 2026: 22% → 16%, −6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
16%from 22% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 5 pointsRank 1 of 72, unchanged
8 categories · RankedSite24x7
224Judge labels
32First choices
13Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
8Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
16% in Infra monitoring for small business buyers
Rank 5 of 79 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
2 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 16 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Site24x7 →By buyer segmentStrongest at small business.
Small business1 of 74
16%35 labels
accepted challenger
Mid-market5 of 79
8%16 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprisenot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
In infra monitoring · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Site24x7 for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Infrastructure monitoring | IT operations and endpoint | 8% | 5 of 79 | 0% | 16 | accepted challenger | ▼−15Since September 2026: 24% → 9%, −15 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Application performance monitoring | IT operations and endpoint | 6% | 4 of 66 | 0% | 16 | accepted challenger | ▲+4Since September 2026: 2% → 7%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Website and synthetic monitoring | IT operations and endpoint | 4% | 8 of 67 | 4% | 28 | accepted challenger | |
| AIOps platforms | IT operations and endpoint | 4% | 8 of 93 | 0% | 8 | under 10 labels · led by New Relic at 17% | |
| Network monitoring and management | Network and edge | 0% | 14 of 78 | 0% | 8 | under 10 labels · led by Auvik at 26% | |
| Data quality and observability | Data platform | 0% | 33 of 110 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Metaplane at 31% | |
| Network detection and response | Security operations | 0% | 62 of 102 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by ManageEngine NetFlow Analyzer at 21% | |
| Observability platforms | IT operations and endpoint | 0% | 45 of 80 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Grafana at 27% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Site24x7 moved past the floor in one of eight categories: Infra monitoring, −15 points to 9%. It held within the floor in the other seven.
Best category · Infra monitoring · by segment
Mid-market▼−15Since September 2026: 24% → 9%, −15 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.
9%from 24% in September 2026
Cleared the floor by 4 pointsRank 1 → 4 of 69
EnterprisegoneNot named this edition; 0% in September 2026.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsNot ranked
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Infra monitoring | 24% | 9% | ▼−15Since September 2026: 24% → 9%, −15 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked. | Moved past the floor | Rank 1 → 5 of 79 |
| APM | 2% | 7% | ▲+4Since September 2026: 2% → 7%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 9 → 4 of 66 |
| AIOps | 0% | 4% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 4% now. | New this edition | Rank 8 of 93, unchanged |
| Uptime monitoring | 0% | 4% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 4% now. | New this edition | Rank 8 of 67, unchanged |
| Network monitoring | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 14 of 78, unchanged |
| Data observability | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 33 of 110, unchanged |
| NDR | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 62 of 102, unchanged |
| Observability | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 28 → 45 of 80 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Site24x7 across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Site24x7 across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 2 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 10 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 1 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 7 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 7 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 2 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 7 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Kimi K2 | 2 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 8 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 4 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 10 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 7 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 1 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 6 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct44 labels8
Paraphrase49 labels16
Comparative48 labels9not counted in share
Budget-constrained46 labels6
Scale-constrained12 labels2
Negative25 labels5not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative224 labels in all, every segment counted; 32 of the 46 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Site24x7 offers the best all-in-one value with performance monitoring, synthetic transaction monitoring, real user monitoring (RUM), SSL tracking, and multi-cloud visibility.” Muse Glimmer 30B · Uptime monitoring · comparative prompt · first choice
“Site24x7 and ManageEngine OpManager are the top choices due to their comprehensive features, scalability, and affordability” Mistral Small · Infra monitoring · direct prompt · first choice
“Site24x7 stands out as one of the most budget-friendly options, starting from $10/month (billed annually)” Claude Haiku 4.5 · AIOps · budget prompt · first choice
“the best AIOps platform for a company with a limited budget is likely to be Site24x7 or Elastic Cloud” Llama 4 Maverick · AIOps · budget prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“There is a steep pricing model for smaller businesses, steep learning curve due to extensive features” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Uptime monitoring · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Site24x7, over the 224 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Site24x7 was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Site24x7, over the 224 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Site24x7 was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Site24x7. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 214 of the 224 answers that named Site24x7 and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
motadata.com121
g2.com110
comparitech.com78
learn.g2.com64
uptimerobot.com60
site24x7.comYour site56
uptrace.dev56
middleware.io50
newrelic.com48
hyperping.com47
634 of the 690 domain citations in answers naming Site24x7 came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
site24x7.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Site24x7 takes 8% of first choices and Datadog takes 28%.ShowHide
Search and answers
site24x7.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Site24x7 takes 8% of first choices and Datadog takes 28%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “infrastructure monitoring tool”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “infrastructure monitoring tools”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 1,300 a month (“site24x7”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 61 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 174,542 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 23,428 · 733 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 6,673
- Paid Google search
- 8 searches its ads show for, about 53 clicks and $522 a month (estimate)
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
8%
rank 5 of 79 in infra monitoring
Segment leader
28%
Datadog
- First choices
- 32 across its categories
- Named in
- 224 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 214 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on site24x7.com
14,554
subdomains included
Content
1,908
counted in the table below
Documentation
1
Product · Integration
121 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 492 | 10 | 2026-09-18 | ||
| Template or tool | 434 | undated | |||
| Glossary or explainer | 433 | undated | |||
| News or press | 305 | 1 | 2026-09-29 | ||
| Comparison | 119 | 1 | 2026-09-17 | ||
| Report or ebook | 98 | undated | |||
| Conference or event | 20 | undated | |||
| Webinar or virtual event | 6 | undated | |||
| Case study | 1 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-09-29Announcements news or press
- 2026-09-18Slo best practices blog
- 2026-09-17Free vs paid website monitoring comparison
- 2026-09-14Statusiq ios 27 updates blog
- 2026-08-21Blog ai in website monitoring blog
- 2026-08-18Blog dns monitoring tool recommended by network admins blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page site24x7.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as Site24x7
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Site24x7; a claim can dispute any of them.
ManageEngine Site24x7 3Site24x7 (by Zoho) 2Site24x7 APM Insight 1Site24x7 Server Monitoring 1Site24x7 by ManageEngine 1
Follow Site24x7
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Site24x7 is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Site24x7 is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Digital Experience Management & Observability Platform
- For
- DevOps & IT Ops
- Price stated
- free & paid monitoring services site24x7.com
- Starting price
- 9 site24x7.com/pricing.html
- Free plan or trial
- 30-day free trial site24x7.com
- Hosting
- Site24x7.comSite24x7.euSite24x7.net.auSite24x7.inSite24x7.cn
- Customers named
- tecRacerRevenue GridCrosscountry mortgageWarehouse StationeryIIFL
- Not stated on the pages read
- Integrations, certifications
What Site24x7's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: site24x7.com, site24x7.com/pricing.html, site24x7.com/solutions. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Site24x7's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Site24x7, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Site24x7 by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Site24x7 is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Site24x7, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.