AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › IT operations and endpoint › Infra monitoring › New Relic vs Grafana
Infrastructure monitoring · October 2026 Edition

New Relic vs Grafana

Two of fourteen models named New Relic first on the direct prompt; one named Grafana. New Relic was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and Grafana by twelve and New Relic carries 49 labels and Grafana 33, so the shares are not directly comparable.

New Relic

accepted challenger

Named in eight categories this edition.

Grafana

accepted challenger

Named in five categories this edition.

First-choice share16%4%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate16%6%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#3#6A position in a field of 13; printed, not drawn.
Labels4933A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, New Relic reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Datadog was named alongside these two in eight of the fourteen direct answers. Datadog vs New Relic · Datadog vs Grafana · Zabbix vs New Relic

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the infrastructure monitoring page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
New RelicFirst choices, of fourteen modelsGrafana
Direct21
Paraphrase401 against Grafana
Comparative00
Budget-constrained002 against New Relic
Scale-constrained21
Negative006 against New Relic · 1 against Grafana
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, New Relic and Grafana were named in the same answer 214 times, of the 720 answers naming New Relic and the 292 naming Grafana. In those answers Grafana took the first choice forty-three times and New Relic twenty-six.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where New Relic and Grafana stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.1 Fast
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
New Relic Grafana first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, New Relic on the left and Grafana on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where New Relic and Grafana stood in it.

New Relic first, Grafana an alternative

2 of 14 modelsGrafana was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Gemini 3.5 FlashNew Relic alternatives: Better Stack, Grafana, LogicMonitor, Site24x7
Grok 4.1 FastNew Relic alternatives: Datadog, ManageEngine OpManager, Site24x7

Grafana first, New Relic an alternative

1 of 14 modelsNew Relic was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
GLM 4.7 FlashXDatadog, Grafana alternatives: Dynatrace, ManageEngine OpManager, New Relic

Neither was the first choice, one was named

6 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
GPT-5.4 miniDatadog alternatives: Dynatrace, Grafana, New Relic
Perplexity SonarPaessler PRTG alternatives: Datadog, ManageEngine OpManager, New Relic, Site24x7, Zabbix
DeepSeek V4 FlashSite24x7 alternatives: Grafana Stack, ManageEngine OpManager, New Relic
Qwen 3.7 FlashDatadog alternatives: Grafana, Middleware.io, Paessler PRTG, Prometheus + Grafana, Zabbix
Kimi K2LogicMonitor alternatives: Better Stack, New Relic, Paessler PRTG, Site24x7
GPT-6 LunaDatadog alternatives: Grafana, New Relic

Neither was named

5 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Claude Haiku 4.5no first choice
Mistral SmallManageEngine OpManager, Site24x7 alternatives: Netdata
Llama 4 Maverickno first choice
MiniMax M2.5Datadog alternatives: ManageEngine OpManager, Prometheus + Grafana, Sematext
Muse Glimmer 30BDatadog alternatives: LogicMonitor, ManageEngine OpManager, Paessler PRTG, Prometheus + Grafana, Site24x7, Zabbix

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Grafana leads by seven points.
Grafana12%#4 of 14
New Relic5%#7 of 14
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
The order flips: New Relic leads at mid-market.
New Relic16%#3 of 13
Grafana4%#6 of 13
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
New Relic leads by six points.
New Relic6%#4 of 14
Grafana0%#8 of 14
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about New Relic

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Two of two in this category shown.

“Avoid SaaS like Datadog/New Relic (start at $15+/host/month, costs explode)” Grok 4.1 Fast · budget prompt · hard negative
“Offers a simpler pricing model than Datadog... strong, unified platform that is often much easier to budget for at a 500-person scale.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · scale prompt · first choice

What the models said about Grafana

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. One of one in this category shown.

“The Open-Standard / Developer-Preferred (Highly Recommend for 2026) * Grafana Cloud: Excellent for engineering-driven cultures.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · scale prompt · first choice
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.