Every category where a model named ManageEngine OpManager for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Infrastructure monitoring	IT operations and endpoint	0%	12 of 65	0%	9	under 10 labels · led by Site24x7 at 24%
IT service management	IT operations and endpoint	0%	42 of 48	100%	1	under 10 labels · led by Freshservice at 58%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for ManageEngine OpManager yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated ManageEngine OpManager across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	3	0	3
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	0	1
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	0	1
Llama 4 Maverick	1	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	1	1
Kimi K2	1	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	1	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct3 labelsNone

Paraphrase3 labelsNone

Comparative3 labelsNone

Budget-constrained4 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative2 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative15 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Best network-first monitoring: PRTG, SolarWinds, or ManageEngine OpManager.” Perplexity Sonar · Infra monitoring · comparative prompt · alternative

“Choose ManageEngine OpManager if you: Have significant on-premise infrastructure” Kimi K2 · Infra monitoring · direct prompt · alternative

“~$500/year (varies by node count) | Broad coverage, good for SMBs” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Infra monitoring · budget prompt · alternative

“if your team wants a more SMB-friendly, cost-conscious tool” Perplexity Sonar · Infra monitoring · paraphrase prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“their larger, on-premise legacy stacks often face criticism similar to BMC regarding "bloatware."” Qwen 3.7 Flash · ITSM · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as ManageEngine OpManager, over the 15 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and ManageEngine OpManager was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Zabbix10 of 154Not in the top three

Paessler PRTG10 of 151Not in the top three

Site24x79 of 153Not in the top three

Datadog9 of 151Not in the top three

New Relic7 of 151Not in the top three

Netdata6 of 151Not in the top three

Dynatrace4 of 150Not in the top three

Nagios4 of 150Not in the top three

Better Stack3 of 152Not in the top three

LogicMonitor3 of 151Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named ManageEngine OpManager. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 15 of the 15 answers that named ManageEngine OpManager and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

netdata.cloud11

middleware.io10

gartner.com9

motadata.com7

blog.domotz.com6

comparitech.com6

learn.g2.com6

guideflow.com5

betterstack.com4

dash0.com4

Sixty-eight of the sixty-eight domain citations in answers naming ManageEngine OpManager came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

netdata.cloud/resources/best-infrastructure-monitoring-tools11

middleware.io/blog/infrastructure-monitoring-tools10

gartner.com/reviews/market/infrastructure-monitoring-tools9

motadata.com/blog/best-it-infrastructure-monitoring-tools7

blog.domotz.com/all/best-it-infrastructure-monitoring-tools6

comparitech.com/net-admin/infrastructure-monitoring6

learn.g2.com/cloud-monitoring-tools6

dash0.com/comparisons/infrastructure-monitoring-tools4

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as ManageEngine OpManager

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as ManageEngine OpManager; a claim can dispute any of them.

ManageEngine/OpManager 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when ManageEngine OpManager's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as ManageEngine OpManager, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at manageengine.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.