IT AI Index

Index › Vendors › UptimeRobot · September 2026 Edition

3 categories · Named, not ranked

UptimeRobot

24Judge labels

1First choices

1Negative labels

10 of 12Models named it

3Categories

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

6 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. UptimeRobot was named 6 times in Infra monitoring and 2 other categories, where Site24x7 led with 24%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business12 of 62

under the label threshold

Mid-market20 of 65

under the label threshold

Enterprise64 of 66

under the label threshold

In infra monitoring · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named UptimeRobot for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Infrastructure monitoring	IT operations and endpoint	0%	20 of 65	0%	4	under 10 labels · led by Site24x7 at 24%
Application performance monitoring	IT operations and endpoint	0%	61 of 70	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by New Relic at 54%
Incident management and on-call	IT operations and endpoint	0%	37 of 53	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by incident.io at 25%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for UptimeRobot yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated UptimeRobot across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	1	1	2
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	1	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	0	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	2	2
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct2 labelsNone

Paraphrase6 labels1

Comparative2 labels1not counted in share

Budget-constrained6 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative8 labels3not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative24 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 5 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“free tier: 50 monitors at 5-minute check intervals - Perfect for basic needs and very small operations” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Infra monitoring · budget prompt · alternative

“Lightweight and affordable, especially for startups and SMBs focused on checks” Perplexity Sonar · Infra monitoring · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as UptimeRobot, over the 24 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and UptimeRobot was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

New Relic15 of 244Not in the top three

Datadog15 of 243Not in the top three

Zabbix11 of 241Not in the top three

Grafana10 of 244Not in the top three

Site24x79 of 241Not in the top three

Dynatrace9 of 240Not in the top three

Prometheus + Grafana9 of 240Not in the top three

Better Stack5 of 241Not in the top three

Nagios5 of 240Not in the top three

Paessler PRTG5 of 240Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named UptimeRobot. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 18 of the 24 answers that named UptimeRobot and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

gartner.com10

instatus.com8

g2.com7

ir.com7

netdata.cloud6

toolradar.com6

uptimerobot.comYour site6

comparitech.com5

fivenines.io5

guideflow.com5

Fifty-nine of the sixty-five domain citations in answers naming UptimeRobot came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

ir.com/guides/top-observability-tools-comparison-2026-smbs-vs-enterprise-platforms7

netdata.cloud/resources/best-infrastructure-monitoring-tools6

fivenines.io/best-infrastructure-monitoring-tools5

gartner.com/reviews/market/infrastructure-monitoring-tools5

gartner.com/reviews/market/observability-platforms5

scmgalaxy.com/tutorials/top-10-observability-platforms-features-pros-cons-comparison5

toolradar.com/guides/best-observability-platforms5

middleware.io/blog/infrastructure-monitoring-tools4

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as UptimeRobot

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as UptimeRobot; a claim can dispute any of them.

Pingdom / UptimeRobot 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when UptimeRobot's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as UptimeRobot, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at uptimerobot.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.