| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Website and synthetic monitoring | IT operations and endpoint | 24% | 1 of 67 | 26% | 53 | criticized challenger | |
| Infrastructure monitoring | IT operations and endpoint | 0% | 24 of 79 | 0% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by Datadog at 28% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Incident management and on-call | IT operations and endpoint | 0% | 49 of 65 | 50% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by incident.io at 32% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Network monitoring and management | Network and edge | 0% | 66 of 78 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Auvik at 26% |
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 5 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Grok 4.20 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 5 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 5 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 5 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 5 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 5 |
| Kimi K2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 5 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Shortlist to evaluate: Uptime.com, Better Stack, or UptimeRobot Enterprise — all offer enterprise features without the complexity and cost of full observability suites like Datadog.” Kimi K2 · Uptime monitoring · scale prompt · first choice
“Most teams with limited budgets find Uptime Kuma (if self-hosted) or UptimeRobot (free plan) to be the best starting points” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Uptime monitoring · budget prompt · first choice
“UptimeRobot is the best default choice because it is repeatedly identified as the best free or low-cost option” Perplexity Sonar · Uptime monitoring · budget prompt · first choice
“the best overall choice is usually UptimeRobot if you want the simplest, cheapest way to get reliable uptime checks” GPT-5.4 mini · Uptime monitoring · budget prompt · first choice
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“If you rely on it for anything critical, the false positives alone can erode trust in your monitoring system. The ToS change was also a significant red flag” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Uptime monitoring · negative prompt · hard negative
“Tools to Avoid/Caution: UptimeRobot (Free Plan) ... its free tier has significant limitations that professional DevOps teams often reject” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Uptime monitoring · negative prompt · hard negative
“Avoid UptimeRobot Free for a business unless you move to a paid plan, because the free tier is now personal-use only.” Muse Glimmer 30B · Uptime monitoring · budget prompt · hard negative
“several users and reviewers have expressed caution. UptimeRobot has repeatedly stripped features from its paid plans over time, which has eroded trust” Mistral Small · Uptime monitoring · negative prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 182 of the 200 answers that named UptimeRobot and are not a share of its labels.
452 of the 586 domain citations in answers naming UptimeRobot came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 169 | 10 | 2026-09-24 | ||
| Comparison | 29 | 9 | 2026-08-05 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 10 | 0 | 2026-06-12 | ||
| Case study | 6 | undated | |||
| Template or tool | 5 | 2 | 2026-08-12 | ||
| Report or ebook | 1 | undated |
Every page uptimerobot.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read September 29, 2026.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What UptimeRobot's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: uptimerobot.com, uptimerobot.com/pricing, uptimerobot.com/security, uptimerobot.com/customers, uptimerobot.com/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when UptimeRobot's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as UptimeRobot, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for UptimeRobot by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
AI models recommend UptimeRobot first in Website and synthetic monitoring this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.