Infrastructure monitoring
Asked as “infrastructure monitoring tool”, and as “server and cloud infrastructure monitoring solution”, on behalf of a mid-market B2B company. 50 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
28%
Contested · Zabbix 20%
28Datadog20Zabbix16New Relic36others
28% of first choices, contested.
Since September 2026↗new leaderNew leader since September 2026: Datadog (27%) replaces Site24x7 (24% then, 9% now), 18 points clear, past the 11-point floor.Datadog leads at 27%, replacing Site24x7, which led at 24% and stands at 9% now: 18 points clear, past the floor.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small business
Site24x716%Contested▼−6Since September 2026: 22% → 16%, −6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →Mid-market
Datadog28%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since September 2026: Datadog (27%) replaces Site24x7 (24% then, 9% now), 18 points clear, past the 11-point floor.This pageEnterpriseDatadog41%Clear leader▲+7Since September 2026: 35% → 42%, +7 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →
Site24x716%Contested▼−6Since September 2026: 22% → 16%, −6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →Mid-marketDatadog28%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since September 2026: Datadog (27%) replaces Site24x7 (24% then, 9% now), 18 points clear, past the 11-point floor.This pageEnterpriseDatadog41%Clear leader▲+7Since September 2026: 35% → 42%, +7 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →The standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
01Datadog28%41%59criticized challenger▲+14Since September 2026: 13% → 27%, +14 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.13% → 27%
Datadog28%41%59criticized challenger▲+14Since September 2026: 13% → 27%, +14 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.13% → 27%02
Zabbix20%22%46accepted challenger▲+3Since September 2026: 18% → 20%, +3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.18% → 20%
Zabbix20%22%46accepted challenger▲+3Since September 2026: 18% → 20%, +3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.18% → 20%03
New Relic16%16%49accepted challenger▼−4Since September 2026: 22% → 18%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.22% → 18%
New Relic16%16%49accepted challenger▼−4Since September 2026: 22% → 18%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.22% → 18%04
ManageEngine OpManager8%4%25accepted challenger▲+7Since September 2026: 0% → 7%, +7 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 7%
ManageEngine OpManager8%4%25accepted challenger▲+7Since September 2026: 0% → 7%, +7 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 7%05Site24x78%0%16accepted challenger▼−15Since September 2026: 24% → 9%, −15 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.24% → 9%
Site24x78%0%16accepted challenger▼−15Since September 2026: 24% → 9%, −15 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.24% → 9%06
Grafana4%6%33accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 4% → 5%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.4% → 5%
Grafana4%6%33accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 4% → 5%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.4% → 5%07
Paessler PRTG4%13%23accepted challenger▲+5Since September 2026: 0% → 5%, +5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 5%
Paessler PRTG4%13%23accepted challenger▲+5Since September 2026: 0% → 5%, +5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 5%08
Prometheus4%32%31criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 4% → 5%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.4% → 5%
Prometheus4%32%31criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 4% → 5%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.4% → 5%09
Netdata2%0%19accepted challenger▼−4Since September 2026: 7% → 2%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.7% → 2%
Netdata2%0%19accepted challenger▼−4Since September 2026: 7% → 2%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.7% → 2%Show the four products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
13
Splunk0%67%12criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
Splunk0%67%12criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%11
Dynatrace0%45%38criticized challenger▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 0%
Dynatrace0%45%38criticized challenger▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 0%12
Nagios0%38%21criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
Nagios0%38%21criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%10
Prometheus + Grafana0%5%19accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
Prometheus + Grafana0%5%19accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each
Datadog vs Site24x7Datadog vs GrafanaDatadog vs Paessler PRTGDatadog vs PrometheusZabbix vs New RelicZabbix vs ManageEngine OpManagerZabbix vs Site24x7Zabbix vs GrafanaZabbix vs Paessler PRTGZabbix vs PrometheusNew Relic vs ManageEngine OpManagerNew Relic vs Site24x7New Relic vs GrafanaNew Relic vs Paessler PRTGNew Relic vs PrometheusManageEngine OpManager vs Site24x7ManageEngine OpManager vs GrafanaManageEngine OpManager vs Paessler PRTGManageEngine OpManager vs PrometheusSite24x7 vs GrafanaSite24x7 vs Paessler PRTGSite24x7 vs PrometheusGrafana vs Paessler PRTGGrafana vs PrometheusPaessler PRTG vs Prometheus
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01020304050607080910111213Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative40%
Key
01Datadog28%
Datadog28%02Zabbix20%
Zabbix20%03New Relic16%
New Relic16%04ManageEngine OpManager8%
ManageEngine OpManager8%05Site24x78%
Site24x78%06Grafana4%
Grafana4%07Paessler PRTG4%
Paessler PRTG4%08Prometheus4%
Prometheus4%09Netdata2%
Netdata2%10Prometheus + Grafana0%
Prometheus + Grafana0%11Dynatrace0%
Dynatrace0%12Nagios0%
Nagios0%13Splunk0%
Splunk0%What they warned about
Three of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, Perplexity Sonar, Grok 4.1 Fast, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX, MiniMax M2.5, GPT-6 Luna and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Datadog41%
24 of 59 labels negative · 12 of 14 models · 4 hard negative
“costs escalate rapidly, with log management and APM billed separately ... making it hard to predict monthly costs” Claude Haiku 4.5, negative prompt
Dynatrace45%
17 of 38 labels negative · 11 of 14 models · 3 hard negative
“Dynatrace is expensive at scale ... Memory-based pricing is unintuitive and budget-hostile” Claude Haiku 4.5, negative prompt
Prometheus32%
10 of 31 labels negative · 8 of 14 models
“Avoid "turnkey" open source stacks when you lack the team to maintain upgrades... an unpatched Prometheus/Grafana deployment is a liability.” Muse Glimmer 30B, negative prompt
Zabbix22%
10 of 46 labels negative · 7 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“**Avoid** **Nagios** and **raw Zabbix** if you value speed and ease-of-use over granular control.” Qwen 3.7 Flash, negative prompt
What they cite
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list: fourteen of the fourteen in this edition, and all six flagship models on the expanded tier.
Sites the answers cite
73 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 900 links across 212 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 14 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.
vendor site · Motadata51 answers · 66 citations · 11 models
32 answers · 38 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Middleware.io30 answers · 30 citations · 12 models
29 answers · 30 citations · 10 models
vendor site · New Relic28 answers · 36 citations · 12 models
vendor site · Netdata27 answers · 28 citations · 12 models
18 answers · 18 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Sematext18 answers · 18 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Hyperping16 answers · 18 citations · 10 models
vendor site · G215 answers · 19 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Uptrace15 answers · 18 citations · 11 models
vendor site · G215 answers · 15 citations · 9 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
47 answers · 10 models
29 answers · 10 models
26 answers · 12 models
24 answers · 10 models
18 answers · 7 models
18 answers · 8 models
16 answers · 9 models
15 answers · 10 models
14 answers · 9 models
13 answers · 8 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best infrastructure monitoring tool”, “infrastructure monitoring tool”, “infrastructure monitoring tools”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Datadog datadoghq.com Datadog 28%, Datadog Infrastructure Monitoring Pro 2% | 30% | 585 | 74,000 | 3,541 | 159,408 | $633 | 120 | 5 |
| Zabbix zabbix.com | 20% | 279 | 12,100 | 992 | 18,850 | 3 | ||
| New Relic newrelic.com | 16% | 629 | 14,800 | 843 | 83,276 | $412 | 89 | |
| ManageEngine parent site ManageEngine OpManager 8% | 8% | 178 | 8,100 | 675 | ||||
| Site24x7 site24x7.com | 8% | 214 | 1,300 | 61 | 174,542 | $522 | 120 | |
| Grafana grafana.com Grafana 4%, Prometheus + Grafana 0% | 4% | 247 | 40,500 | 2,627 | 84,520 | 116 | ||
| Paessler PRTG paessler.com | 4% | 80 | 390 | 14 | 107,237 | $12,945 | 120 | |
| Prometheus prometheus.io | 4% | 257 | 246,000 | 11,819 | 22,996 | |||
| Netdata netdata.cloud | 2% | 91 | 2,900 | 91 | 13,040 | 1 | 2 | |
| LogicMonitor logicmonitor.com | 2% | 138 | 5,400 | 236 | 82,441 | $1,636 | 31 | 4 |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 20 sites; 3 of them are among the sites the models cited here (hyperping.com, middleware.io, netdata.cloud). The first result for “best infrastructure monitoring tool” is hyperping.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best infrastructure monitoring tool for a mid-market B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which server and cloud infrastructure monitoring solution would you recommend to a mid-sized B2B company?”Comparative“What are the top infrastructure monitoring tools and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best infrastructure monitoring tool for a company with a limited budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 500 person company evaluating an infrastructure monitoring tool. What should we look at?”Negative“Which infrastructure monitoring tools should I avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5no first choiceagainst: Dynatrace, SplunkSite24x7ChangedSigNozagainst: Datadog, DynatraceZabbixno first choiceagainst: Datadog, Dynatrace, Grafana Stack, New Relic, Paessler PRTG, Splunk, Zabbix
Three alternatives
Datadog, LogicMonitor, New RelicTwo alternatives
Better Stack, Middleware.ioFour alternatives
Grafana, Nagios, Paessler PRTG, PrometheusGPT-5.4 miniDatadogDatadogHeldDatadogZabbixno first choicenothing named
Three alternatives
Dynatrace, Grafana, New RelicFour alternatives
Dynatrace, Grafana, New Relic, SolarWinds ObservabilityFour alternatives
Dynatrace, Grafana, New Relic, PrometheusTwo alternatives
Grafana, PrometheusGemini 3.5 FlashNew Relicagainst: DatadogNew RelicHeldagainst: DatadogDatadogZabbixGrafana, New Relicagainst: Amazon CloudWatch, Datadog, Dynatraceagainst: Cacti, Datadog, Dynatrace, ELK Stack, Elastic Observability, Kibana, Munin, Nagios, New Relic, Prometheus, SolarWinds, Zenoss
Four alternatives
Better Stack, Grafana, LogicMonitor, Site24x7Three alternatives
Grafana, LogicMonitor, Site24x7Five alternatives
Dynatrace, LogicMonitor, New Relic, Prometheus + Grafana, ZabbixFive alternatives
Better Stack, Grafana, Netdata, New Relic, PrometheusTwo alternatives
Honeycomb, SigNozPerplexity SonarPaessler PRTGSite24x7ChangedDatadog, DynatraceZabbixno first choiceagainst: Datadog, Dynatrace, Icinga, Nagios, New Relic, Splunk, Zabbix
Five alternatives
Datadog, ManageEngine OpManager, New Relic, Site24x7, ZabbixThree alternatives
Prometheus + Grafana, Sematext, ZabbixSix alternatives
Amazon CloudWatch, Nagios, New Relic, Paessler PRTG, Prometheus, ZabbixTwo alternatives
Paessler PRTG, Prometheus + GrafanaGrok 4.1 FastNew Relicagainst: Prometheus, ZabbixDatadogChangedagainst: Dynatrace, Grafana + Prometheus, ZabbixDatadogagainst: SolarWinds NPMZabbixagainst: Amazon CloudWatch, Datadog, New Relic, Paessler PRTGDatadog, New Relicagainst: Datadog, Dynatrace, Grafana, Icinga, ManageEngine OpManager, Nagios, New Relic, Prometheus, SolarWinds Orion, Zabbix
Three alternatives
Datadog, ManageEngine OpManager, Site24x7Three alternatives
ManageEngine OpManager, New Relic, Paessler PRTGFour alternatives
Dynatrace, New Relic, Prometheus, ZabbixThree alternatives
Grafana, Netdata, PrometheusTwo alternatives
ManageEngine OpManager, ZabbixMistral SmallManageEngine OpManager, Site24x7no first choiceChangedno first choicePrometheusno first choiceagainst: Datadog, Dynatrace
One alternative
NetdataFour alternatives
Grafana, Netdata, Paessler PRTG, ZabbixDeepSeek V4 FlashSite24x7against: DatadogNew RelicChangedagainst: Datadog, Grafana, Prometheusno first choiceZabbixagainst: Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic, SolarWinds, Splunkno first choiceagainst: Datadogagainst: Advanced Host Monitor, Datadog, Nagios, New Relic, Paessler PRTG, Prometheus, Splunk, Zabbix
Three alternatives
Grafana Stack, ManageEngine OpManager, New RelicOne alternative
GrafanaFour alternatives
Checkmk, Paessler PRTG, Prometheus + Grafana, SigNozLlama 4 Maverickno first choiceManageEngine OpManagerChangedno first choiceManageEngine OpManagerno first choiceagainst: Checkly, Datadog, Dynatrace, Pingdom
Two alternatives
G2, HyperpingSeven alternatives
Amazon CloudWatch, Azure Monitor, Google Cloud Monitoring, Netdata, Prometheus, UptimeRobot, ZabbixQwen 3.7 FlashDatadogagainst: DynatraceDatadogHeldno first choicePrometheus, Zabbixagainst: Datadog, SplunkDatadogagainst: Nagios, Zabbixagainst: Datadog, Elastic Observability, Elastic Stack, Nagios, Prometheus, Splunk, Zabbix
Five alternatives
Grafana, Middleware.io, Paessler PRTG, Prometheus + Grafana, ZabbixOne alternative
ManageEngine OpManagerThree alternatives
Checkmk, Grafana, NetdataFour alternatives
Dynatrace, Grafana, New Relic, PrometheusKimi K2LogicMonitoragainst: Datadog, DynatraceDatadogChangedno first choiceagainst: NagiosZabbixno first choiceagainst: Datadog, Dynatrace, Prometheus + Grafanaagainst: Datadog, Nagios, New Relic, SolarWinds Orion
Four alternatives
Better Stack, New Relic, Paessler PRTG, Site24x7Four alternatives
LogicMonitor, Paessler PRTG, Prometheus + Grafana, Site24x7Three alternatives
Grafana, Netdata, PrometheusFour alternatives
LogicMonitor, ManageEngine OpManager, New Relic, Paessler PRTGGLM 4.7 FlashXDatadog, GrafanaDatadog, New RelicChangedno first choiceZabbixno first choiceagainst: Amazon CloudWatch, AppDynamics, Azure Monitor, Datadog, Dynatrace, Prometheus, SolarWinds Network Performance Monitor, Zabbix
Three alternatives
Dynatrace, ManageEngine OpManager, New RelicFour alternatives
Prometheus + Grafana, Site24x7, SolarWinds Observability, ZabbixFour alternatives
Grafana, ManageEngine OpManager, Prometheus, Site24x7MiniMax M2.5Datadogagainst: Dynatrace, SplunkDatadog, New RelicChangedDatadog, DynatraceNetdata, Paessler PRTGno first choiceagainst: Datadog, Dynatrace, Prometheus
Three alternatives
ManageEngine OpManager, Prometheus + Grafana, SematextTwo alternatives
ManageEngine OpManager, SolarWinds ObservabilitySix alternatives
Grafana, ManageEngine OpManager, Nagios, Prometheus, SolarWinds Observability, ZabbixOne alternative
ManageEngine OpManagerGPT-6 LunaDatadogDatadog Infrastructure Monitoring ProChangedno first choiceCheckmk Communityno first choiceagainst: Datadog, Grafana Agent, Prometheus, Promtail
Two alternatives
Grafana, New RelicTwo alternatives
Grafana, New RelicNine alternatives
Amazon CloudWatch, Checkmk, Datadog, Dynatrace, Grafana, New Relic, Prometheus, SolarWinds Observability, ZabbixTwo alternatives
Grafana, PrometheusMuse Glimmer 30BDatadogManageEngine OpManagerChangedno first choiceZabbixno first choiceagainst: New Relic Infrastructure Monitoring, Prometheus, Rocket Servergraph, SolarWinds Network Performance Monitor, SolarWinds Orion, Zabbix
Six alternatives
LogicMonitor, ManageEngine OpManager, Paessler PRTG, Prometheus + Grafana, Site24x7, ZabbixSix alternatives
Datadog, Grafana, New Relic, Paessler PRTG, Prometheus, Site24x7Five alternatives
Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic, Prometheus + Grafana, ZabbixFour alternatives
ManageEngine OpManager, Nagios, Netdata, Prometheus + GrafanaBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency. Full answer text is in the free responses file. Download the record
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 12:33 | no | 0 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 09:25 | yes | 4 | 6 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 08:03 | yes | 20 | 30 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 12:27 | yes | 19 | 2 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 13:23 | yes | 22 | 8 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 12:30 | yes | 9 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 12:50 | yes | 21 | 38 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 09:47 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 13:22 | yes | 8 | 26 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 13:08 | yes | 14 | 27 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 13:48 | yes | 14 | 33 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 12:12 | yes | 5 | 40 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 08:07 | yes | 3 | 15 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 09:45 | yes | 10 | 23 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 13:19 | yes | 9 | 9 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 11:26 | yes | 5 | 7 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 09:58 | yes | 11 | 22 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 13:06 | yes | 19 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 13:37 | yes | 24 | 12 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 08:02 | no | 0 | 2 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 11:05 | yes | 20 | 43 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 08:43 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 12:57 | yes | 5 | 29 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 11:43 | yes | 20 | 21 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 11:14 | yes | 19 | 42 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 13:42 | yes | 10 | 19 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 13:38 | yes | 4 | 15 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 09:55 | yes | 14 | 27 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 10:20 | yes | 9 | 8 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 10:04 | yes | 3 | 9 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 13:20 | yes | 8 | 25 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 09:46 | yes | 19 | 7 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 08:26 | yes | 18 | 9 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 08:53 | yes | 8 | 7 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 08:28 | yes | 19 | 44 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 10:25 | yes | 5 | 1 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 10:34 | yes | 10 | 28 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 12:23 | yes | 15 | 26 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 09:15 | yes | 24 | 88 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 12:55 | yes | 13 | 27 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 08:50 | yes | 7 | 18 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 12:33 | yes | 13 | 24 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 11:01 | yes | 9 | 10 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 11:08 | yes | 2 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 09:23 | no | 0 | 12 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 10:42 | yes | 19 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 09:20 | yes | 13 | 6 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 08:11 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 10:49 | yes | 10 | 24 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 07:56 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 12:18 | no | 0 | 34 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 13:12 | yes | 14 | 23 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 10:48 | yes | 10 | 50 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 08:35 | yes | 9 | 19 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 07:44 | yes | 2 | 12 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 07:58 | yes | 14 | 28 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 13:20 | no | 0 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 09:06 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 07:45 | no | 0 | 20 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 09:58 | yes | 19 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 10:40 | yes | 12 | 9 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 11:14 | no | 0 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 12:17 | yes | 15 | 45 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 12:04 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 10:17 | no | 0 | 30 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 13:31 | yes | 18 | 52 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 08:37 | no | 0 | 40 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 11:24 | no | 0 | 52 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 11:09 | yes | 4 | 14 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 10:25 | yes | 11 | 28 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 10:43 | yes | 18 | 11 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 08:18 | yes | 6 | 7 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 10:45 | yes | 15 | 24 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 12:23 | yes | 19 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 12:17 | yes | 23 | 10 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 10:52 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 11:19 | yes | 24 | 42 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 10:05 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 07:42 | yes | 5 | 54 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 08:29 | yes | 25 | 28 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 08:54 | yes | 24 | 33 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 11:57 | yes | 17 | 32 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 09:13 | yes | 3 | 15 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 13:46 | yes | 25 | 31 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
AWS CloudWatch read as Amazon CloudWatch
Elastic read as Elastic Observability
Elastic Cloud read as Elastic Observability
Grafana Cloud read as Grafana
Motadata read as Motadata ObserveOps
Unresolved, counted raw
Advanced Host Monitor
Bocada
Checkmk Community
Datadog Infrastructure Monitoring Pro
GCP Operations
Grafana Agent
Munin
New Relic Infrastructure Monitoring
OpManager
Promtail
Rocket Servergraph
Sysdig Monitor
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.