Every category where a model named RSA SecurID for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Multi-factor authentication	Identity and access	0%	13 of 78	17%	12	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for RSA SecurID yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated RSA SecurID across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	1	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	1	0	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	1	1
Mistral Small	1	1	0	2
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	1	0	2
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	1	0	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	1	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	1	2

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct2 labelsNone

Paraphrase2 labelsNone

Comparative18 labelsNone

Budget-constrained1 labelNone

Scale-constrained3 labelsNone

Negative3 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative29 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Strong in regulated industries due to its long-standing reputation and hardware token support” Mistral Small · MFA · comparative prompt · alternative

“Best for legacy/regulated environments: RSA SecurID” Perplexity Sonar · MFA · comparative prompt · alternative

“Legacy VPN/RADIUS infrastructure | Duo or RSA SecurID” Kimi K2 · MFA · comparative prompt · alternative

“Regulated/legacy \u2192 RSA SecurID.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · MFA · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Complex: RSA SecurID (legacy systems, higher overhead)” MiniMax M2.5 · MFA · comparative prompt · soft negative

“Older tech feel; costly” Grok 4.1 Fast · MFA · comparative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as RSA SecurID, over the 29 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and RSA SecurID was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Cisco Duo28 of 2915Not in the top three

YubiKey26 of 294Not in the top three

Okta25 of 299Not in the top three

Microsoft Entra ID19 of 295Not in the top three

Ping Identity19 of 290Not in the top three

Microsoft Authenticator14 of 290Not in the top three

HYPR11 of 290Not in the top three

Beyond Identity7 of 290Not in the top three

Authy5 of 290Not in the top three

Google Authenticator5 of 290Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named RSA SecurID. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 25 of the 29 answers that named RSA SecurID and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

startwithidentity.com21

rippling.com17

expertinsights.com12

manageengine.com12

workos.com12

decryptiondigest.com11

oloid.com11

miniorange.com9

authx.com7

techleague.io7

119 of the 119 domain citations in answers naming RSA SecurID came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

rippling.com/blog/mfa-providers17

startwithidentity.com/rankings/best-mfa-for-enterprises16

expertinsights.com/identity-and-access-management/the-top-multi-factor-authentication-mfa-12

decryptiondigest.com/blog/enterprise-mfa-platform-comparison-2026-duo-okta-microsoft-ping-11

oloid.com/blog/multi-factor-authentication-solutions11

manageengine.com/products/self-service-password/blog/mfa/mfa-solutions-and-vendors.html10

startwithidentity.com/rankings/best-mfa-solutions10

workos.com/blog/top-mfa-providers-202610

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as RSA SecurID

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as RSA SecurID; a claim can dispute any of them.

RSA 1RSA SecurID Authentication Manager 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when RSA SecurID's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as RSA SecurID, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at rsasecurid.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.