Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 49 → 57 of 57
RSA · 1 category · RankedRSA SecurID
19Judge labels
0First choices
8Negative labels
10 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
0% in MFA for enterprise buyers
Rank 21 of 77 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 20% of its 5 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business60 of 60
0%3 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market21 of 77
0%5 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise55 of 63
0%11 labels
criticized challenger
In mfa · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named RSA SecurID for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Multi-factor authentication | Identity and access | 0% | 21 of 77 | 20% | 5 | under 10 labels · led by Cisco Duo at 47% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, RSA SecurID held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · MFA · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 12 → 19 of 69
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 10 → 21 of 59
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MFA | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 12 → 21 of 77 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated RSA SecurID across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated RSA SecurID across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative9 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained5 labelsNone
Negative5 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative19 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“A long-standing choice for regulated or traditional enterprise environments” Perplexity Sonar · MFA · comparative prompt · alternative
“Legacy enterprise/on-prem needs | RSA SecurID” MiniMax M2.5 · MFA · comparative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“More dated UX compared to modern solutions; hardware token logistics” DeepSeek V4 Flash · MFA · comparative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as RSA SecurID, over the 19 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and RSA SecurID was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as RSA SecurID, over the 19 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and RSA SecurID was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named RSA SecurID. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 15 of the 19 answers that named RSA SecurID and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
expertinsights.com9
frontegg.com8
duo.com7
manageengine.com7
workos.com7
aimultiple.com6
checkthat.ai5
decryptiondigest.com5
gbhackers.com5
securityboulevard.com5
Sixty-four of the sixty-four domain citations in answers naming RSA SecurID came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
rsa.com ranks 8 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, RSA SecurID takes 0% of first choices and Cisco Duo takes 47%.ShowHide
Search and answers
rsa.com ranks 8 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, RSA SecurID takes 0% of first choices and Cisco Duo takes 47%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “mfa solution”
8
Position for “mfa solutions”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 2,900 a month (“rsa securid”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 113 a month
- Its company's site
- rsa.com shared with RSA's other products; the figures are the site's
- Organic visits to its site
- about 45,286 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 3,730 · 450 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 13,773
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 21 of 77 in MFA
Segment leader
47%
Cisco Duo
- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 19 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 15 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Follow RSA SecurID
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
RSA is the company behind RSA SecurID.ShowHide
The company
RSA is the company behind RSA SecurID.
ShowHideOn record
Company recordsIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- On-premises access, authentication, and identity management capabilities.
- Not stated on the pages read
- Who it is for, price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting, customers
What RSA SecurID's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: rsa.com, rsa.com/products. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when RSA SecurID's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as RSA SecurID, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for RSA SecurID by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where RSA SecurID is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name RSA SecurID, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.