Dynamic application security testing for enterprise buyers
Asked as “DAST tool”, and as “dynamic web application security scanner”, on behalf of an enterprise B2B company. 52 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, twelve models each. Added to the September 2026 Edition; its answers are read by the distilled judge (ai-indexes-judge-qwen3-14b-run3), not the claude-opus-5 judge of the earlier categories: how the two compare.
Standing · first-choice share
62%
Clear leader
62Invicti12Burp Suite DAST04Burp Suite23others
62% of first choices, clear leader.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
The standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all twelve models, for an enterprise B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Show the four products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
One product takes 62% of first choices here, so the chart would put thirteen markers in one corner and one at the far edge. The two measurements it plots are columns in the standing above: share, and the negative label rate. Four products carry a negative rate above 25% in this category.
What they warned about
Seven of twelve models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, Mistral Small, Qwen 3.7 Flash, GLM 4.7 FlashX and MiniMax M2.5 changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Burp Suite
52%
12 of 23 labels negative · 10 of 12 models · 3 hard negative
“Per-user pricing ($49k/year for enterprise edition caps at 1,000 users) — becomes extremely costly at thousands of users” DeepSeek V4 Flash, budget prompt
OWASP ZAP76%
16 of 21 labels negative · 9 of 12 models · 2 hard negative
“OWASP ZAP (Unmanaged) ... often inadequate as the *sole* solution for enterprise-wide automated testing” Qwen 3.7 Flash, negative prompt
Invicti10%
6 of 63 labels negative · 6 of 12 models
“Claims 99.98% accuracy, but **independent benchmarks measured 23% false-positive rate** — the highest among tested enterprise tools” Kimi K2, negative prompt
Acunetix35%
8 of 23 labels negative · 5 of 12 models
“Older generations of Acunetix or AppScan (prior to major JS engine upgrades) ... Traditional DAST tools often fail to render JavaScript” Qwen 3.7 Flash, negative prompt
What they cite
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list: fourteen of the twelve in this edition, and all six flagship models on the expanded tier.
Sites the answers cite
77 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 12 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 1119 links across 193 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page.
vendor site · Invicti52 answers · 113 citations · 14 models
vendor site · Augment Code49 answers · 51 citations · 12 models
41 answers · 45 citations · 12 models
vendor site · Aikido40 answers · 51 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Beagle Security32 answers · 46 citations · 11 models
vendor site · StackHawk32 answers · 36 citations · 12 models
vendor site · Checkmarx29 answers · 39 citations · 12 models
28 answers · 29 citations · 11 models
25 answers · 25 citations · 9 models
vendor site · CyberPress24 answers · 33 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Escape21 answers · 26 citations · 9 models
19 answers · 21 citations · 11 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
49 answers · 12 models
40 answers · 13 models
39 answers · 12 models
29 answers · 12 models
25 answers · 9 models
23 answers · 9 models
23 answers · 9 models
19 answers · 9 models
19 answers · 10 models
17 answers · 9 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best dast tool”, “dast tool”, “dast tools”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Invicti invicti.com | 62% | 137 | 90,500 | 83 | 54,568 | $50 | 24 | |
| Burp Suite DAST | 12% | 170 | 13 | |||||
| Veracode veracode.com Veracode DAST 4% | 4% | 48 | 4,400 | 194 | 12,543 company | 17 | ||
| HCL AppScan hcl-software.com | 4% | 54 | 260 | 13 | 49,667 | 38 | ||
| Burp Suite | 4% | 12,100 | 681 | |||||
| Rapid7 parent site Rapid7 InsightAppSec 2% | 2% | 50 | 14,800 | 798 | ||||
| Burp Suite Enterprise Edition | 2% | 30 | 1 | |||||
| Checkmarx checkmarx.com Checkmarx One 2%, Checkmarx DAST 0% | 2% | 245 | 260 | 3 | 54,982 company | 61 | 3 | |
| Aikido aikido.dev Aikido Security 2% | 2% | 342 | 2,400 | 51 | 6,442 company | $936 | 120 | |
| StackHawk stackhawk.com | 2% | 142 | 590 | 10 | 8,458 | 8 | 6 |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 21 sites; 3 of them are among the sites the models cited here (checkmarx.com, escape.tech, stackhawk.com). The first result for “best dast tool” is snyk.io.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best DAST tool for an enterprise B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which dynamic web application security scanner would you recommend to a large B2B company with thousands of employees?”Comparative“What are the top enterprise-grade DAST tools and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best DAST tool for a large company that needs predictable total cost across thousands of users?”Scale-constrained“We are a 5,000 person company with SSO, SOC 2 and procurement review requirements evaluating a DAST tool. What should we look at?”Negative“Which DAST tools should a large enterprise avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5Burp Suite DAST, Invictino first choiceChangedCheckmarx DAST, InvictiInvictino first choiceagainst: Checkmarx One, Micro Focus Fortify WebInspect
Three alternatives
Acunetix, OX Security, StackHawkThree alternatives
Burp Suite DAST, StackHawk, Veracode DASTOne alternative
EscapeGPT-5.4 miniInvictiagainst: AcunetixInvictiHeldagainst: OWASP ZAPAcunetix, Invicti, Rapid7 InsightAppSecagainst: OWASP ZAPBurp Suite, Burp Suite DAST, Invictiagainst: OWASP ZAPno first choiceagainst: Acunetix, Burp Suite, OWASP ZAP, Qualys Web Application Scanning, StackHawk
One alternative
Burp Suite Enterprise EditionTwo alternatives
Burp Suite Enterprise Edition, Checkmarx DASTThree alternatives
Burp Suite Enterprise Edition, Checkmarx DAST, DetectifyTwo alternatives
Black Duck Continuous Dynamic, OpenTextGemini 3.5 FlashInvictiInvictiHeldInvictiBurp Suite DASTagainst: Invicti, Rapid7 InsightAppSec, StackHawk, Veracode DASTno first choiceagainst: Acunetix, Detectify, HCL AppScan, Intruder, Nikto, OWASP ZAP, OpenText
Four alternatives
Burp Suite Enterprise Edition, Escape, StackHawk, Veracode DASTFive alternatives
Burp Suite Enterprise Edition, Checkmarx DAST, Escape, HCL AppScan, StackHawkFive alternatives
Checkmarx DAST, HCL AppScan, PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition, Rapid7 InsightAppSec, Veracode DASTThree alternatives
Checkmarx One, GitLab Ultimate, OWASP ZAPPerplexity SonarInvictiInvictiHeldInvictiHCL AppScan, Invictiagainst: Burp Professional, Checkmarx One, Veracode DASTno first choiceagainst: Burp Suite, Detectify, Intruder, OWASP ZAP
Two alternatives
Checkmarx DAST, Veracode DASTTwo alternatives
OpenText Fortify WebInspect, Veracode DASTFive alternatives
Aikido Security, Bright Security, Checkmarx One, Rapid7 InsightAppSec, Veracode DASTGrok 4.1 FastInvictiInvictiHeldagainst: Burp Suite, OWASP ZAPInvicti, Veracode DASTagainst: OWASP ZAPPortSwigger's Burp Suiteagainst: Acunetix, Checkmarx One, OWASP ZAP, Rapid7 InsightAppSecInvictiagainst: Acunetix, Burp Suite, Fortify WebInspect, Invicti, OWASP ZAP, Veracode DAST
Two alternatives
Burp Suite Enterprise Edition, Checkmarx DASTFour alternatives
OpenText Fortify WebInspect, Qualys Web Application Scanning, Rapid7 InsightAppSec, Veracode DASTFive alternatives
Black Duck, Checkmarx One, HCL AppScan, PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition, Rapid7 InsightAppSecTwo alternatives
Invicti, Veracode DASTTwo alternatives
Aikido Security, Beagle SecurityMistral SmallInvictiAcunetix, InsightAppSecChangedBurp Suite Enterprise Edition, InvictiInvicti, Rapid7 InsightAppSecno first choiceagainst: Invicti
Four alternatives
Acunetix, Bright Security, Burp Suite, Rapid7 InsightAppSecThree alternatives
Checkmarx DAST, Snyk, Veracode DASTTwo alternatives
Acunetix, Bright SecurityOne alternative
Burp Suite Enterprise EditionDeepSeek V4 FlashInvictiagainst: Acunetix, Qualys Web Application ScanningInvictiHeldInvictiHCL AppScanagainst: Bright Security, Burp Suite, Rapid7 InsightVM, StackHawk, Tenableno first choiceagainst: StackHawkagainst: Acunetix, Burp Suite, Checkmarx DAST, OWASP ZAP, Veracode DAST
Three alternatives
Burp Suite, Checkmarx One, Veracode DASTTwo alternatives
Burp Suite DAST, HCL AppScanSix alternatives
Burp Suite, Checkmarx DAST, HCL AppScan, OpenText Fortify WebInspect, Rapid7 InsightAppSec, Veracode DASTFour alternatives
Aikido Security, Checkmarx One, Invicti, Qualys Web Application ScanningLlama 4 Maverickno first choiceno first choiceHeldno first choiceInvictino first choicenothing named
Qwen 3.7 FlashCheckmarx One, Veracode DASTInvicti, Veracode DASTChangedBurp Suite Enterprise EditionBurp Suite Enterprise Editionagainst: Checkmarx One, Contrast Security, HCL AppScan, Invicti, Veracode DASTno first choiceagainst: Acunetix, AppScan, Burp Suite, OWASP ZAP, Standard Qualys WAS, Tenable Nessus, Tenable.io Basic Modules
Four alternatives
Contrast Security, Invicti, PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise, Rapid7 InsightAppSecTwo alternatives
Acunetix SaaS, PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise EditionFour alternatives
Contrast Security, Fortify WebInspect, Invicti, Rapid7 InsightAppSecKimi K2InvictiInvictiHeldagainst: Burp SuiteInvictiInvictiagainst: SnykInvictiagainst: HCL AppScan, Invicti, Qualys WAS
Two alternatives
Burp Suite, HCL AppScanTwo alternatives
Checkmarx One, Veracode DASTFive alternatives
Burp Suite, Checkmarx DAST, HCL AppScan, Rapid7 InsightAppSec, Veracode DASTThree alternatives
Acunetix, Checkmarx One, TenableFour alternatives
Bright Security, Checkmarx DAST, Rapid7 InsightAppSec, StackHawkGLM 4.7 FlashXBurp Suite, InvictiInvictiChangedInvicti, Veracode DASTagainst: OWASP ZAPStackHawkagainst: Burp Suite, OWASP ZAP, Tenable Web App Scanningno first choicenothing named
One alternative
HCL AppScanOne alternative
HCL AppScanFive alternatives
Bright Security, Burp Suite, HCL AppScan, OX Security, OpenText Fortify WebInspectOne alternative
SnykMiniMax M2.5Aikido Security, InvictiInvictiChangedInvictiBurp Suite DAST, Invictino first choiceagainst: Burp Suite, OWASP ZAP, Qualys WAS
One alternative
InsightAppSecTwo alternatives
Acunetix, HCL AppScanFour alternatives
Acunetix, Checkmarx DAST, Fortify WebInspect, Qualys WASBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency. Full answer text is in the free responses file. Download the record
Seventy-two rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-05 01:02 | yes | 9 | 9 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-05 00:33 | yes | 2 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-04 22:09 | yes | 9 | 26 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-05 00:15 | yes | 23 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-04 23:31 | yes | 22 | 12 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-04 23:26 | yes | 10 | 6 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-04 22:23 | yes | 23 | 37 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-05 00:46 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-04 23:04 | yes | 10 | 39 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-05 00:53 | yes | 15 | 21 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-05 01:12 | yes | 24 | 32 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-05 01:21 | yes | 9 | 19 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-05 00:01 | no | 0 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-05 01:49 | yes | 2 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-05 01:28 | yes | 11 | 29 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-05 01:36 | yes | 19 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-05 00:06 | yes | 22 | 10 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-05 00:00 | yes | 14 | 8 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-05 01:08 | yes | 22 | 35 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-05 01:08 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-05 01:47 | no | 0 | 30 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-05 01:50 | yes | 18 | 44 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-04 23:31 | yes | 18 | 130 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-05 01:39 | yes | 10 | 41 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-05 01:33 | yes | 16 | 10 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-05 00:26 | yes | 7 | 7 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-04 23:00 | yes | 16 | 29 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-04 23:20 | yes | 18 | 6 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-05 01:38 | yes | 23 | 11 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-04 22:58 | yes | 23 | 17 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-04 23:26 | yes | 20 | 65 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-05 00:58 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-04 23:11 | no | 0 | 30 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-05 01:50 | yes | 18 | 29 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-05 01:13 | yes | 23 | 77 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-05 00:02 | yes | 20 | 45 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-04 22:46 | yes | 18 | 9 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-05 00:40 | yes | 4 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-05 00:05 | yes | 14 | 25 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-05 01:50 | yes | 30 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-04 22:47 | yes | 19 | 12 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-05 00:20 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-05 00:25 | yes | 24 | 45 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-05 00:40 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-05 00:16 | yes | 25 | 96 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-05 01:34 | yes | 24 | 30 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-05 01:13 | yes | 20 | 56 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-05 01:29 | yes | 20 | 74 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-04 23:59 | yes | 15 | 14 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-05 01:24 | no | 0 | 10 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-05 01:35 | yes | 6 | 28 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-05 01:48 | yes | 18 | 4 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-05 01:25 | yes | 14 | 10 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-05 01:07 | no | 0 | 8 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-05 00:41 | yes | 22 | 69 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-04 22:13 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-05 00:48 | no | 0 | 31 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-05 01:02 | yes | 21 | 44 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-04 22:52 | no | 0 | 21 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-05 00:20 | yes | 9 | 16 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-05 01:03 | yes | 18 | 9 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-04 22:40 | yes | 3 | 6 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-04 23:22 | yes | 11 | 22 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-05 00:27 | yes | 35 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-05 01:54 | yes | 18 | 10 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-05 00:57 | yes | 16 | 11 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-05 01:40 | yes | 25 | 43 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-05 01:01 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-05 01:16 | yes | 8 | 52 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-04 22:40 | yes | 16 | 29 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-05 01:42 | yes | 22 | 77 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-04 23:54 | yes | 13 | 36 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Aikido read as Aikido Security
Astra read as Astra Security
Checkmarx read as Checkmarx One
Checkmarx (Checkmarx One platform) read as Checkmarx One
OpenText WebInspect read as OpenText Fortify WebInspect
OpenText WebInspect (Fortify) read as OpenText Fortify WebInspect
OpenText WebInspect (ex-Micro Focus) read as OpenText Fortify WebInspect
Qualys read as Qualys Web Application Scanning
Qualys Web App Scanning read as Qualys Web Application Scanning
Rapid7 read as Rapid7 InsightAppSec
Veracode read as Veracode DAST
Veracode (Application Protection Platform) read as Veracode DAST
Veracode Dynamic Analysis read as Veracode DAST
Unresolved, counted raw
Acunetix SaaS
BlackDuck Continuous Dynamic
Burp Professional
Fortify ScanCentral DAST
Micro Focus Fortify WebInspect
NTT Application Security (formerly WhiteHat)
OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing
OpenText Fortify DAST
Standard Qualys WAS
Tenable.io Basic Modules
WebInspect
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.