AI Indexes
IT AI Index
September 2026 Edition, published September 17, 2026 · The permanent record of that edition, superseded since. The current standing is on the category page →
Index › Developer platform › September 2026 Edition

Artifact and container registries

Asked as “artifact repository”, and as “container registry”, on behalf of a mid-market B2B company. 63 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, twelve models each. Added to the September 2026 Edition; its answers are read by the distilled judge (ai-indexes-judge-qwen3-14b-run3), not the claude-opus-5 judge of the earlier categories: how the two compare.
Standing · first-choice share
14%
Contested · Sonatype Nexus Repository 11%
14JFrog Artifactory11Sonatype Nexus Repository10Amazon Elastic Container Registry65others

14% of first choices, contested.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.

The standing

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
01JFrog Artifactory14%23%48accepted challenger
02Sonatype Nexus Repository11%5%20accepted challenger
03Amazon Elastic Container Registry10%0%15accepted challenger
04Cloudsmith8%10%21accepted challenger
05Amazon ECR8%0%12accepted challenger
06Azure Container Registry5%3%33accepted challenger
07GitHub Packages5%24%42accepted challenger
08Sonatype Lifecycle5%8%13accepted challenger
09Google Artifact Registry Lab in the set3%3%37accepted challenger
10Harbor3%5%41accepted challenger
11GitLab Package Registry3%10%10accepted challenger
12AWS ECR2%0%12accepted challenger
Show the four products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
16Docker Hub0%57%30criticized challenger
15Quay.io0%50%12criticized challenger
13AWS CodeArtifact0%0%17accepted challenger
14Azure Artifacts0%0%17accepted challenger
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.

Google Artifact Registry is made by Google, whose model Gemini 3.5 Flash is in the set. On the four share prompts that model made it the first choice one time of 4; the other eleven models one time of 44. Lab treatment is defined on the method page; the row is marked, not excluded.

Recommended versus criticized

Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.

Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01
02
A03
04
A05
A06
G07
08
G09
10
11
A12
A13
A14
Q15
16
Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative30%
Key
01JFrog Artifactory14%
02Sonatype Nexus Repository11%
03Amazon Elastic Container Registry10%
04Cloudsmith8%
05Amazon ECR8%
06Azure Container Registry5%
07GitHub Packages5%
08Sonatype Lifecycle5%
09Google Artifact Registry3%
10Harbor3%
11GitLab Package Registry3%
12AWS ECR2%
13AWS CodeArtifact0%
14Azure Artifacts0%
15Quay.io0%
16Docker Hub0%

What they warned about

Zero of twelve models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Perplexity Sonar, Grok 4.1 Fast, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX and MiniMax M2.5 changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Docker Hub
57%
17 of 30 labels negative · 13 of 12 models · 9 hard negative
“Public Container Registries (Exercise Extreme Caution) **Docker Hub** - Studies show approximately 2.5-3% of publicly listed images contain malicious payloads” MiniMax M2.5, negative prompt
GitHub Packages
24%
10 of 42 labels negative · 8 of 12 models · 1 hard negative
“avoid direct, unrestricted use of public community images from Docker Hub, GitHub Container Registry, npm/PyPI, Artifact Hub” Muse Glimmer 30B, negative prompt
JFrog Artifactory
23%
11 of 48 labels negative · 7 of 12 models · 3 hard negative
“Note: Avoid **JFrog Artifactory** if you have a tight budget.” Gemini 3.5 Flash, budget prompt
Quay.io
50%
6 of 12 labels negative · 6 of 12 models
“Be cautious with public registries like Docker Hub, Quay.io, and GitHub Container Registry (for public images)” Grok 4.1 Fast, negative prompt

What they cite

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list: fourteen of the twelve in this edition, and all six flagship models on the expanded tier.

Sites the answers cite

75 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 12 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 1026 links across 241 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page.

vendor site · Harness27 answers · 44 citations · 10 models
vendor site · CloudRepo25 answers · 37 citations · 11 models
vendor site · JFrog24 answers · 37 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Sonatype22 answers · 43 citations · 9 models
22 answers · 39 citations · 13 models
22 answers · 38 citations · 10 models
vendor site · G219 answers · 28 citations · 12 models
19 answers · 19 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Railway18 answers · 18 citations · 11 models
vendor site · SourceForge17 answers · 21 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Safeguard16 answers · 20 citations · 8 models
16 answers · 16 citations · 8 models

Pages the answers cite

The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.

Search against answers

Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “artifact and container registries”, “artifact repository”, “best artifact repository”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Company and productsShareOwn site citedName searches, GoogleAI search demand, est.Organic visitsPaid search a month, est.Google ads, last 30 daysBest Google position
Sonatype sonatype.com
Sonatype Nexus Repository 11%, Sonatype Nexus Repository OSS 6%, Sonatype Lifecycle 5%, Sonatype Nexus Repository Community Edition 3% and 1 more
27%1217203871,814 company$1,87975
Amazon parent site
Amazon Elastic Container Registry 10%, Amazon ECR 8%
17%29151,000,0001,380,939
JFrog Artifactory jfrog.com
JFrog Artifactory 14%, JFrog Container Registry 2%
16%1362,90017238,697$371201
Cloudsmith cloudsmith.com8%621,300253,190$98234
Azure Container Registry5%301,00047,904
GitHub parent site
GitHub Packages 5%
5%1041,500,00031,479
Google Cloud parent site
Google Artifact Registry 3%
3%99165,0007,596
Harbor goharbor.io3%11674,000331,9183,420
GitLab parent site
GitLab Package Registry 3%
3%1690,5004,844
Nexus OSS3%

Google's top ten for the three searches hold 21 sites; 6 of them are among the sites the models cited here (docs.cloud.google.com, harness.io, itechguides.com, jfrog.com, sonatype.com, sourceforge.net). The first result for “artifact and container registries” is docs.cloud.google.com.

How they answered

Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHide
ModelDirect“What is the best artifact repository for a mid-market B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which container registry would you recommend to a mid-sized B2B company?”Comparative“What are the top artifact and container registries and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best artifact repository for a company with a limited budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 500 person company evaluating an artifact repository. What should we look at?”Negative“Which artifact and container registries should I avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5no first choiceAmazon ECRChanged
Four alternativesAzure Container Registry, Google Artifact Registry, Harbor, JFrog Container Registry
no first choiceGitHub Packages
One alternativeNexus Repository OSS
no first choiceagainst: Docker Hub, ECR Public, Harbor
GPT-5.4 miniSonatype Nexus Repository
Two alternativesAWS CodeArtifact, JFrog Artifactory
Amazon ECRChanged
Two alternativesArtifact Registry, Azure Container Registry
no first choiceSonatype Nexus Repository OSS
One alternativeJFrog Artifactory OSS
no first choiceagainst: Docker Hub
Gemini 3.5 FlashCloudsmith
Five alternativesAWS CodeArtifact, Azure Artifacts, GitLab Package Registry, Google Artifact Registry, Sonatype Lifecycle
against: GitHub Packages, JFrog Artifactory
Amazon Elastic Container Registry, Google Artifact RegistryChanged
Three alternativesAzure Container Registry, GitHub Packages, GitLab Container Registry
against: Harbor
JFrog Artifactory
Eight alternativesAWS CodeArtifact, Amazon Elastic Container Registry, Azure Container Registry, Cloudsmith, GitHub Packages, Google Artifact Registry, Harbor, Sonatype Nexus Repository
against: Docker Hub
GitHub Packages, GitLab Package Registry
Five alternativesAWS CodeArtifact, Azure Artifacts, Google Artifact Registry, Harbor, Sonatype Nexus Repository OSS
against: JFrog Artifactory
JFrog Artifactory
Six alternativesAWS CodeArtifact, Azure Artifacts, Google Artifact Registry, JFrog Xray, Sonatype Lifecycle, Sonatype Nexus Repository
against: GitHub Packages, GitLab Package Registry
against: Amazon ECR Public, Docker Hub, Gitea, Google Container Registry, Harbor Registry, Istio Legacy Registries, Legacy Free Bitnami Image Repositories, Legacy GitHub Packages Docker Registry, Quay.io, Self-Hosted JFrog Artifactory
Perplexity SonarJFrog Artifactory
Two alternativesCloudsmith, Sonatype Nexus Repository
Red Hat QuayChanged
Three alternativesAmazon ECR, Harbor, JFrog Artifactory
no first choiceNexus OSS
Two alternativesHarbor, Verdaccio
no first choicenothing named
Grok 4.1 FastCloudsmith
One alternativeAWS CodeArtifact
against: JFrog Artifactory, Sonatype Nexus Repository
AWS ECR, Azure Container Registry, Google Artifact RegistryChanged
Three alternativesGitHub Packages, Harbor, JFrog Artifactory
against: Docker Hub
no first choiceSonatype Nexus Repository OSS
Three alternativesAWS CodeArtifact, GitHub Packages, Harbor
against: JFrog Artifactory
JFrog Artifactory
Five alternativesAWS CodeArtifact, DVC, Harbor, MLflow, Sonatype Lifecycle
against: Docker Hub, GitHub Packages, Nexus, Quay.io
Mistral SmallCloudsmith
Three alternativesAWS, Google Cloud, Packagecloud
Amazon Elastic Container RegistryChanged
Three alternativesAzure Container Registry, DigitalOcean Container Registry, Google Artifact Registry
Google Artifact Registry, JFrog Artifactory
Four alternativesAmazon Elastic Container Registry, Azure Container Registry, Docker Hub, Harbor
against: Google Container Registry
Harbor, Nexus Repository OSS
Two alternativesCloudsmith, GitHub Packages
JFrog Artifactory, Sonatype Lifecycle
Six alternativesAWS ECR, Azure Artifacts, CodeArtifact, GitHub Packages, GitLab Container Registry, Harbor
against: Docker Hub
DeepSeek V4 FlashSonatype Nexus Repository
Two alternativesAzure Artifacts, Cloudsmith
against: JFrog Artifactory
Amazon Elastic Container RegistryChanged
Four alternativesAzure Container Registry, GitHub Packages, Google Artifact Registry, Harbor
against: Docker Hub, Oracle Cloud Infrastructure Registry
no first choiceSonatype Nexus Repository OSS
Four alternativesDevPI, GitLab Package Registry, Harbor, Verdaccio
against: Cloudsmith, JFrog Artifactory OSS, JFrog Cloud
JFrog Artifactory, Sonatype Lifecycle
One alternativeCloudsmith
against: GitHub Packages
against: Azure Container Registry, Docker Hub, GitHub Packages, Google Artifact Registry, Maven Central, NuGet, PyPI, Quay.io, npm Registry
Llama 4 MaverickCloudsmith
One alternativePackagecloud
Amazon Elastic Container Registry, DigitalOcean Container RegistryChangedno first choiceHarbor, Nexus OSSno first choiceagainst: Docker Hub, Google Container Registry
Qwen 3.7 FlashJFrog Artifactory
Three alternativesAWS CodeArtifact, Azure Artifacts, Sonatype Lifecycle
Amazon Elastic Container RegistryChanged
Four alternativesAzure Container Registry, GitLab Container Registry, Google Artifact Registry, Harbor
no first choiceSonatype Nexus Repository OSS
Three alternativesGitHub Packages, Harbor, JFrog Artifactory OSS
Artifactory, Nexusagainst: GitHub, GitLab Packagesagainst: Docker Hub, GitHub Packages, JFrog Artifactory, Sonatype Lifecycle
Kimi K2GitHub Packages
Three alternativesAWS CodeArtifact, Azure Artifacts, Sonatype Nexus Repository
against: JFrog Artifactory
Amazon Elastic Container Registry, Azure Container RegistryChanged
Two alternativesHarbor, JFrog Artifactory
no first choiceagainst: JFrog ArtifactoryGitLab Package Registry
Three alternativesGitHub Packages, Reposilite, Sonatype Nexus Repository OSS
against: JFrog Artifactory
JFrog Artifactory
Two alternativesGitHub Packages, Sonatype Lifecycle
against: Amazon ECR Public Gallery, Docker Hub, GitHub Packages, PyPI, Quay.io, npm Registry
GLM 4.7 FlashXSonatype Nexus Repository
Three alternativesCloudsmith, Harbor, JFrog Artifactory
Amazon ECRChanged
Three alternativesAzure Container Registry, Harbor, JFrog Container Registry
no first choice
Eleven alternativesAmazon ECR, Azure Container Registry, Cloudsmith, Docker Hub, GitHub Packages, GitLab Container Registry, Google Artifact Registry, Harbor, JFrog Artifactory, Quay.io, Sonatype Nexus Repository
against: Bintray, GCR
Sonatype Nexus Repository
Three alternativesArtifact Keeper, CloudRepo, Reposilite
no first choiceagainst: Docker Hub, GitHub Packages, JFrog Artifactory, Quay.io
MiniMax M2.5Sonatype Nexus Repository
Three alternativesAWS CodeArtifact, Cloudsmith, JFrog Artifactory
Azure Container Registry, JFrog Container RegistryChanged
One alternativeMirantis Secure Registry
no first choice
Four alternativesAmazon Elastic Container Registry, Azure Container Registry, Docker Hub, Google Artifact Registry
against: Google Container Registry
Sonatype Nexus Repository Community Edition
Three alternativesAzure Artifacts, GitHub Packages, Repsy
against: Cloudsmith
JFrog Artifactory, Sonatype Lifecycle
One alternativeAWS
against: Docker Hub, GitHub Packages, Quay.io, gcr.io, mcr.microsoft.com
Bold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against

The record

One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency. Full answer text is in the free responses file. Download the record
Seventy-two rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
PromptModelVersion stringTime (UTC)SearchedSourcesLatency
Direct recommendationClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-05 01:08no04 s
Direct recommendationGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-05 00:06yes36 s
Direct recommendationGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-05 01:20yes1943 s
Direct recommendationPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-05 00:29yes133 s
Direct recommendationGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-05 00:42yes198 s
Direct recommendationMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-04 22:18yes53 s
Direct recommendationDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-05 00:56yes2332 s
Direct recommendationLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-05 00:22yes52 s
Direct recommendationQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-05 01:52no032 s
Direct recommendationKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-04 23:19yes1819 s
Direct recommendationGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-05 01:44yes1838 s
Direct recommendationMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-05 01:11yes1928 s
ParaphraseClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-04 22:48yes189 s
ParaphraseGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-05 01:04yes411 s
ParaphraseGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-04 22:22yes824 s
ParaphrasePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-05 00:37yes282 s
ParaphraseGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-05 01:31yes229 s
ParaphraseMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-05 01:14yes55 s
ParaphraseDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-05 00:21yes1978 s
ParaphraseLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-04 23:54yes58 s
ParaphraseQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-04 23:24yes924 s
ParaphraseKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-05 01:14yes1016 s
ParaphraseGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-04 22:47yes1626 s
ParaphraseMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-05 01:15yes532 s
ComparativeClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-04 23:37yes1712 s
ComparativeGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-05 01:08yes46 s
ComparativeGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-05 01:12yes1129 s
ComparativePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-05 01:57yes164 s
ComparativeGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-04 23:27yes2411 s
ComparativeMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-05 00:52yes97 s
ComparativeDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-05 00:04yes2384 s
ComparativeLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-04 23:56yes52 s
ComparativeQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-04 23:36no028 s
ComparativeKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-05 00:02yes1834 s
ComparativeGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-04 23:18yes1449 s
ComparativeMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-04 23:51yes1024 s
Budget constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-04 23:55no04 s
Budget constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-04 23:49yes34 s
Budget constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-05 01:51yes1323 s
Budget constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-05 00:38yes153 s
Budget constrainedGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-05 01:06yes218 s
Budget constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-05 00:55yes53 s
Budget constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-04 23:38yes2436 s
Budget constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-04 22:40yes53 s
Budget constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-05 00:22yes525 s
Budget constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-05 00:13yes1722 s
Budget constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-05 01:10yes23102 s
Budget constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-05 01:03yes1850 s
Scale constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-05 00:29no08 s
Scale constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-05 00:14no010 s
Scale constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-05 01:28no018 s
Scale constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-05 00:27yes205 s
Scale constrainedGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-05 00:37yes1911 s
Scale constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-05 01:30no07 s
Scale constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-05 00:54yes2129 s
Scale constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-05 00:23yes53 s
Scale constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-05 01:53no027 s
Scale constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-04 23:13yes2530 s
Scale constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-04 23:50yes2250 s
Scale constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-04 23:56yes1017 s
Negative framingClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-05 01:09yes169 s
Negative framingGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-05 00:55yes44 s
Negative framingGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-05 00:01yes2132 s
Negative framingPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-05 01:54yes183 s
Negative framingGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-04 23:20yes2511 s
Negative framingMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-04 23:11yes55 s
Negative framingDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-04 23:50yes2437 s
Negative framingLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-05 01:00yes52 s
Negative framingQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-05 01:49yes944 s
Negative framingKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-05 01:39yes2538 s
Negative framingGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-04 22:36yes2441 s
Negative framingMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-04 23:57yes1038 s

Normalization in this category

Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.

ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
AWS Elastic Container Registry (ECR) read as Amazon Elastic Container Registry
AWS Elastic Container Registry, ECR read as Amazon Elastic Container Registry
Azure ACR read as Azure Container Registry
GitHub Container Registry read as GitHub Packages
GitHub Container Registry (GHCR) read as GitHub Packages
GitHub Container Registry (`ghcr.io`) read as GitHub Packages
GitHub Container Registry (ghcr.io) read as GitHub Packages
GitHub Container Registry, ghcr.io read as GitHub Packages
GitHub Packages / GitHub Container Registry read as GitHub Packages
Google Container Registry (GCR) / Artifact Registry read as Google Artifact Registry
JFrog read as JFrog Artifactory
Sonatype read as Sonatype Lifecycle
Unresolved, counted raw
Amazon ECR Public
Amazon ECR Public Gallery (gallery.ecr.aws)
Apache Maven repository
Artifact Hub
Artifact Keeper
Artifactory Community Edition
Bintray (JFrog)
Chainguard Images
DevPI
ECR Public
GitLab's package registry
Google Artifact Registry Docker repositories, formerly GCR
Google Cloud Artifact Registry
Google GCR
Harbor Registry (Self-Hosted)
Istio Legacy Registries (`gcr.io/istio-release` & `registry.istio.io/release`)
JFrog Artifactory Community / OSS Edition
JFrog Cloud
Legacy Free Bitnami Image Repositories
Legacy GitHub Packages Docker Registry (`docker.pkg.github.com`)
Oracle Cloud Infrastructure Registry
Self-Hosted JFrog Artifactory
docker.io/istio
gcr.io (Google)
mcr.microsoft.com (Microsoft)
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.
← App shieldingCI/CD →