Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 71 → 69 of 84
Symantec · 2 categories · Named, not rankedSymantec Identity Governance and Administration
14Judge labels
0First choices
10Negative labels
7 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
6 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Symantec Identity Governance and Administration was named 6 times in IGA and 1 other category, where Microsoft Entra ID Governance led with 25%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business82 of 89
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market74 of 76
0%5 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise75 of 76
0%3 labels
under the label threshold
In iga · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Symantec Identity Governance and Administration for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Identity governance | Identity and access | 0% | 74 of 76 | 60% | 5 | under 10 labels · led by Microsoft Entra ID Governance at 25% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Endpoint detection and response | Security operations | 0% | 31 of 55 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Microsoft Defender for Endpoint at 30% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Symantec Identity Governance and Administration held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · IGA · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 72 → 70 of 71
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 54 → 69 of 70
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IGA | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 72 → 74 of 76 |
| EDR | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 31 of 55, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Symantec Identity Governance and Administration across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Symantec Identity Governance and Administration across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase1 labelNone
Comparative3 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative10 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative14 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“OpenText, Oracle, IBM, Broadcom, and EmpowerID offer strong alternatives” Mistral Small · IGA · comparative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Platforms to watch out for: Oracle Identity Governance (OIG/OIM), Broadcom/CA Identity Suite, IBM Security Verify Governance... Why to avoid or be highly cautious” Gemini 3.5 Flash · IGA · negative prompt · hard negative
“Be wary of: CA Technologies / Broadcom identity products (acquired, support transitions)” Kimi K2 · IGA · negative prompt · hard negative
“If you are running legacy CA IDM or Identity Automation, be extremely wary.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · IGA · negative prompt · hard negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Symantec Identity Governance and Administration, over the 14 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Symantec Identity Governance and Administration was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Symantec Identity Governance and Administration, over the 14 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Symantec Identity Governance and Administration was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Symantec Identity Governance and Administration. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 13 of the 14 answers that named Symantec Identity Governance and Administration and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
reddit.com6
aimultiple.com5
docs.broadcom.comYour site5
cybersecuritynews.com4
expertinsights.com4
g2.com4
gartner.com4
kuppingercole.com4
nhimg.org4
paloaltonetworks.com4
Thirty-nine of the forty-four domain citations in answers naming Symantec Identity Governance and Administration came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
broadcom.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Symantec Identity Governance and Administration takes 0% of first choices and Microsoft Entra ID Governance takes 25%.ShowHide
Search and answers
broadcom.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Symantec Identity Governance and Administration takes 0% of first choices and Microsoft Entra ID Governance takes 25%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “identity governance platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “identity governance platforms”
–
not in the top ten
- Its company's site
- broadcom.com shared with Symantec's other products; the figures are the site's
- Organic visits to its site
- about 604,076 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 74,533 · 7,642 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 54,260
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 74 of 76 in IGA
Segment leader
25%
Microsoft Entra ID Governance
- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 14 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 13 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Names read as Symantec Identity Governance and Administration
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Symantec Identity Governance and Administration; a claim can dispute any of them.
Broadcom (Symantec IGA) 1Broadcom (Symantec IGA, formerly CA) 1Broadcom (specifically legacy CA Technologies / DevAuth) 1Broadcom/CA Identity Suite 1Broadcom/Symantec 1CA Technologies / Broadcom 1
Follow Symantec Identity Governance and Administration
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Symantec is the company behind Symantec Identity Governance and Administration.ShowHide
The company
Symantec is the company behind Symantec Identity Governance and Administration.
ShowHideOn record
Company recordsIs this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Symantec Identity Governance and Administration's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Symantec Identity Governance and Administration, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Symantec Identity Governance and Administration by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Symantec Identity Governance and Administration is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Symantec Identity Governance and Administration, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.