Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 46 → 64 of 68
Symantec · 1 category · Named, not rankedSymantec Privileged Access Manager
6Judge labels
0First choices
5Negative labels
4 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
2 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Symantec Privileged Access Manager was named 2 times in PAM, where Delinea Secret Server led with 37%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business71 of 75
0%1 label
under the label threshold
Mid-market64 of 73
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise55 of 55
0%3 labels
under the label threshold
In pam · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Symantec Privileged Access Manager for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Privileged access management | Identity and access | 0% | 64 of 73 | 50% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Delinea Secret Server at 37% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Symantec Privileged Access Manager held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · PAM · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 66 → 59 of 68
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 40 → 50 of 50
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PAM | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 66 → 64 of 73 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Symantec Privileged Access Manager across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Symantec Privileged Access Manager across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative1 labelNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative5 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative6 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
No positive label carried a quote.
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Unless you are a massive, legacy-heavy enterprise with dedicated Broadcom account support, this platform may feel stagnant compared to cloud-native competitors.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · PAM · negative prompt · hard negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Symantec Privileged Access Manager, over the 6 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Symantec Privileged Access Manager was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Symantec Privileged Access Manager, over the 6 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Symantec Privileged Access Manager was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Symantec Privileged Access Manager. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 6 of the 6 answers that named Symantec Privileged Access Manager and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
heimdalsecurity.com4
reddit.com4
paloaltonetworks.com3
beyondtrust.com2
ciopages.com2
comparisec.com2
delinea.com2
gartner.com2
manageengine.com2
peerspot.com2
Twenty-five of the twenty-five domain citations in answers naming Symantec Privileged Access Manager came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
broadcom.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Symantec Privileged Access Manager takes 0% of first choices and Delinea Secret Server takes 37%.ShowHide
Search and answers
broadcom.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Symantec Privileged Access Manager takes 0% of first choices and Delinea Secret Server takes 37%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “privileged access management platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “privileged access management platforms”
–
not in the top ten
- Its company's site
- broadcom.com shared with Symantec's other products; the figures are the site's
- Organic visits to its site
- about 604,076 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 74,533 · 7,642 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 54,260
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 64 of 73 in PAM
Segment leader
37%
Delinea Secret Server
- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 6 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 6 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Names read as Symantec Privileged Access Manager
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Symantec Privileged Access Manager; a claim can dispute any of them.
Broadcom 1Symantec Privileged Access Manager / CA PAM (Broadcom) 1
Follow Symantec Privileged Access Manager
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Symantec is the company behind Symantec Privileged Access Manager.ShowHide
The company
Symantec is the company behind Symantec Privileged Access Manager.
ShowHideOn record
Company recordsIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Private Community
- Not stated on the pages read
- Who it is for, price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting, customers
What Symantec Privileged Access Manager's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: community.broadcom.com/question/accessing-azure-virtual-desktops-through-pam, community.broadcom.com/question/privileged-access-managerwindows-proxy-agent-with-jetty, community.broadcom.com/question/question-about-a-privileged-access-manager-server-control-endpoint-compatibility-matrix, community.broadcom.com/discussion/new-webcast-recording-available-for-converged-security-mfa-just-in-time-privilege-access-and-monitoring, community.broadcom.com/viewdocument/ca-privileged-access-manager-secu. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Symantec Privileged Access Manager's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Symantec Privileged Access Manager, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Symantec Privileged Access Manager by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Symantec Privileged Access Manager is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Symantec Privileged Access Manager, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.