| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IT asset management | IT operations and endpoint | 2% | 9 of 82 | 30% | 10 | criticized challenger | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| IT service management | IT operations and endpoint | 2% | 8 of 69 | 29% | 14 | criticized challenger | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Incident management and on-call | IT operations and endpoint | 0% | 42 of 65 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by incident.io at 32% | goneNot named this edition; 0% in September 2026. |
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ITAM | 0% | 2% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 29 → 9 of 82 |
| ITSM | 0% | 2% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 11 → 8 of 69 |
| Incidents | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 46 → 42 of 65 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 5 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 5 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“The best ITSM platform for a company with a limited budget is likely to be one of the following options: 1. SolarWinds Service Desk ($39/technician/month)” Llama 4 Maverick · ITSM · budget prompt · first choice
“likely to be one of the following: SolarWinds Service Desk, ManageEngine AssetExplorer, or NinjaOne” Llama 4 Maverick · ITAM · direct prompt · first choice
“Another solid option for mid-market businesses, offering good core ITIL features and strong asset management.” Mistral Small · ITSM · direct prompt · alternative
“cost-effective, user-friendly IT asset management tool designed primarily for small to mid-sized businesses” Muse Glimmer 30B · ITAM · paraphrase prompt · alternative
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“SolarWinds has extra baggage from past security incidents. When to avoid: If modern UX, quick setup, or security are priorities.” Grok 4.20 · ITSM · negative prompt · hard negative
“Platforms to Avoid Due to Reputation (Trust/Safety)... SolarWinds lost significant trust in the market” Qwen 3.7 Flash · ITAM · negative prompt · hard negative
“otherwise, it's a limited ITSM play. Also carries the legacy of the 2020 Supply Chain security incident.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · ITSM · negative prompt · soft negative
“noted for slow report loading, limited data export options, and a complex configuration process” Mistral Small · ITSM · negative prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 52 of the 54 answers that named SolarWinds Service Desk and are not a share of its labels.
163 of the 163 domain citations in answers naming SolarWinds Service Desk came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What SolarWinds Service Desk's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: support.solarwinds.com/service-desk. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when SolarWinds Service Desk's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as SolarWinds Service Desk, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for SolarWinds Service Desk by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows: