| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IT asset management | IT operations and endpoint | 0% | 59 of 82 | 46% | 50 | criticized challenger | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ITAM | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 23 → 59 of 82 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 5 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| Grok 4.20 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 5 |
| Kimi K2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 5 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 5 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Choose ServiceNow if you want a large enterprise platform that combines ITAM with ITSM, CMDB, and automated workflows.” GPT-5.4 mini · ITAM · comparative prompt · first choice
“Choose ServiceNow ITAM if you're a large enterprise already running ServiceNow across ITSM, HR, and other workflows” DeepSeek V4 Flash · ITAM · comparative prompt · first choice
“1. ServiceNow IT Asset Management - Best for: Large enterprises already using ServiceNow's ecosystem” Kimi K2 · ITAM · comparative prompt · first choice
“Most popular and highest-rated by users; ideal for complex, large-scale IT environments” Mistral Small · ITAM · comparative prompt · first choice
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Bottom line: Avoid unless you're a large enterprise with dedicated ServiceNow admins and a budget for six-figure implementation costs.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · ITAM · negative prompt · hard negative
“The "ServiceNow" Trap: Enterprise-tier tools like ServiceNow ITAM or Flexera are incredibly powerful but require massive budgets” Gemini 3.5 Flash · ITAM · scale prompt · hard negative
“Avoid for Mid-Market - ServiceNow: Powerful but overkill for mid-market; expensive” Kimi K2 · ITAM · direct prompt · hard negative
“Be cautious if you're a smaller org or don't already run ServiceNow... steep learning curve, complex setup/integrations, and cost concerns for small businesses” GPT-5.4 mini · ITAM · negative prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 139 of the 150 answers that named ServiceNow IT Asset Management and are not a share of its labels.
475 of the 475 domain citations in answers naming ServiceNow IT Asset Management came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What ServiceNow IT Asset Management's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: careers.servicenow.com/jobs/744000151459726/itam-solution-architect, careers.servicenow.com/jobs/744000149756055/staff-software-engineer-itam, careers.servicenow.com/jobs/744000147325353/global-head-asset-management-am-gtm-lead, careers.servicenow.com/jobs/744000146021539/global-head-asset-management-am-gtm-lead, careers.servicenow.com/jobs/744000147325659/global-head-asset-management-am-gtm-lead. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when ServiceNow IT Asset Management's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as ServiceNow IT Asset Management, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for ServiceNow IT Asset Management by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows: