| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IT asset management | IT operations and endpoint | 0% | 23 of 61 | 44% | 36 | criticized challenger |
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Kimi K2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 6 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“| 1 | ServiceNow ITAM | Large enterprises ... Tightest CMDB/ITSM sync, unlimited scalability, but high cost & long implementation” MiniMax M2.5 · ITAM · comparative prompt · first choice
“Choose ServiceNow or BMC Helix if: You're a large enterprise needing comprehensive ITSM integration” Kimi K2 · ITAM · comparative prompt · first choice
“ServiceNow is the "gold standard" for enterprises needing a unified ITAM/ITSM/ITOM stack.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · ITAM · comparative prompt · first choice
“enterprise leaders like ServiceNow dominate for scale... enterprises need ServiceNow's depth” Grok 4.1 Fast · ITAM · comparative prompt · first choice
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“platforms to approach with caution... Extremely complex setup requiring significant professional services” Kimi K2 · ITAM · negative prompt · hard negative
“Avoid if: You're SMB/mid-market, budget-sensitive, or not already in ServiceNow ITSM.” Grok 4.1 Fast · ITAM · negative prompt · hard negative
“you do not have the massive budget, dedicated ITAM headcount, or time required to implement and maintain heavyweight legacy enterprise systems (like ServiceNow)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · ITAM · scale prompt · soft negative
“Reviews describe high total cost of ownership, a steep learning curve, and complex setup; the platform is positioned as enterprise-focused.” Perplexity Sonar · ITAM · negative prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 98 of the 121 answers that named ServiceNow IT Asset Management and are not a share of its labels.
400 of the 400 domain citations in answers naming ServiceNow IT Asset Management came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when ServiceNow IT Asset Management's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as ServiceNow IT Asset Management, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at servicenow.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.
Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.