AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Products › Qualys WAS · October 2026 Edition
Qualys · 1 category · Named, not ranked

Qualys WAS

23Judge labels
0First choices
9Negative labels
11 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
9 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Qualys WAS was named 9 times in DAST, where OWASP ZAP led with 29%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In dast · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Qualys WAS for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Dynamic application security testingDeveloper platform0%23 of 5833%9under 10 labels · led by OWASP ZAP at 29%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Qualys WAS yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Qualys WAS across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00011
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast01001
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00011
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K201012
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.501102
GPT-6 Luna01001
Muse Glimmer 30B00101

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 labelNone
Paraphrase2 labelsNone
Comparative5 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative14 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative23 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“It's worth evaluating if centralized Qualys asset and risk management matters to you.” GPT-6 Luna · DAST · comparative prompt · alternative
“Enterprise automation: Invicti, Qualys WAS, or Burp Suite Enterprise” MiniMax M2.5 · DAST · comparative prompt · alternative
“Leaders like ... Qualys WAS... score higher on accuracy” Grok 4.1 Fast · DAST · negative prompt · alternative
“Cloud-based enterprise platform” Kimi K2 · DAST · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“older configurations of Fortify WebInspect, HCL AppScan, or Qualys WAS ... tread carefully” Gemini 3.5 Flash · DAST · negative prompt · soft negative
“Can be noisy with false positives, limited modern API coverage, slower scan times” Kimi K2 · DAST · negative prompt · soft negative
“Qualys WAS (overhyped for app security, better for infrastructure)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · DAST · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Qualys WAS, over the 23 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Qualys WAS was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Invicti20 of 238Not among the top eight
OWASP ZAP17 of 234Not among the top eight
HCL AppScan16 of 230Not among the top eight
Rapid7 InsightAppSec16 of 230Not among the top eight
StackHawk14 of 231Not among the top eight
Burp Suite13 of 231Not among the top eight
Acunetix12 of 231Not among the top eight
Checkmarx DAST12 of 230Not among the top eight
Astra Security8 of 231Not among the top eight
Veracode DAST8 of 230Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Qualys WAS. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 23 of the 23 answers that named Qualys WAS and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

getastra.com18
appsecsanta.com15
getautonoma.com15
aikido.dev14
augmentcode.com13
escape.tech12
stackhawk.com12
invicti.com10
aimultiple.com9
beaglesecurity.com9

127 of the 127 domain citations in answers naming Qualys WAS came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

qualys.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Qualys WAS takes 0% of first choices and OWASP ZAP takes 29%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “dast tool”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “dast tools”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
70 a month (“qualys was”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
19,272 a month
Its company's site
qualys.com shared with Qualys's other products; the figures are the site's
Organic visits to its site
about 26,929 a month
Searches its site ranks for
5,871 · 526 in the top three
Sites linking to it
15,233
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
120+ ads · 108 text, 9 video, 3 image · 46 shown in the last 30 days

First shown October 2021, as Qualys Inc, verified. Ads started 2025-10 to 2026-09: 49 in the year, 71 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
0%
rank 23 of 58 in DAST
Segment leader
29%
OWASP ZAP
First choices
0 across its categories
Named in
23 answers
Its own site cited
in 23 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

Names read as Qualys WAS

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Qualys WAS; a claim can dispute any of them.
Qualys WAS (Web Application Scanning) 1Qualys WAS / TotalAppSec 1

Follow Qualys WAS

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Qualys is the company behind Qualys WAS.
ShowHide

On record

Company records

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
Web Application Scanning
For
Web Application Security Analyst
Free plan or trial
Try TotalAppSec at no cost for 30 days qualys.com/apps/web-app-scanning
Integrations claimed
100 qualys.com/apps/web-app-scanning
Certifications
GDPRHIPAAPCI DSS
Customers named
Cisco Systems, Inc.Capital OneMicrosoft
Not stated on the pages read
Price, starting price, hosting

What Qualys WAS's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: qualys.com/faqs-resources-web-application-scanning, qualys.com/apps/web-app-scanning, qualys.com/apps/web-app-scanning/story/web-application-security-analyst-peter, docs.qualys.com/en/was/latest/web_applications/web_apps.htm, docs.qualys.com/en/was/latest/web_applications/basic_info.htm. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Qualys WAS's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Qualys WAS, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Qualys WAS by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Qualys WAS is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Qualys WAS, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at qualys.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.