Every category where a model named Pulseway for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Remote monitoring and management	IT operations and endpoint	0%	14 of 57	0%	6	under 10 labels · led by NinjaOne at 50%
IT asset management	IT operations and endpoint	0%	28 of 61	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by Snipe-IT at 24%
Patch management	IT operations and endpoint	0%	59 of 87	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Action1 at 27%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Pulseway yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Pulseway across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	1	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	0	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	2	2
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	1	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	1	1	2

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct4 labels1

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative8 labelsNone

Budget-constrained7 labelsNone

Scale-constrained2 labelsNone

Negative5 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative26 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Consider Pulseway if you need core RMM features at the lowest cost” MiniMax M2.5 · RMM · budget prompt · alternative

“Real\u2011time monitoring + remote remediation | Pulseway” GLM 4.7 FlashX · ITAM · comparative prompt · alternative

“Pulseway is one of the most affordable RMMs available” Claude Haiku 4.5 · RMM · budget prompt · alternative

“Best "mobile-first" RMM for technicians on the move.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · RMM · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Pulseway, over the 26 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Pulseway was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Atera21 of 265Not in the top three

NinjaOne20 of 269Not in the top three

Syncro19 of 262Not in the top three

Action110 of 263Not in the top three

Datto RMM9 of 260Not in the top three

ConnectWise Automate8 of 260Not in the top three

SuperOps8 of 260Not in the top three

Kaseya VSA6 of 260Not in the top three

N-able N-sight5 of 260Not in the top three

N-able N-central4 of 262Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Pulseway. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 20 of the 26 answers that named Pulseway and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

syncrosecure.com13

ninjaone.com10

superops.com10

blog.domotz.com8

learn.g2.com8

mspcompared.com8

comparitech.com7

reddit.com7

g2.com6

ittoolsguide.com6

Eighty-three of the eighty-three domain citations in answers naming Pulseway came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

syncrosecure.com/blog/best-rmm-software12

superops.com/best-rmm-software-and-tools9

mspcompared.com/best/rmm8

learn.g2.com/best-rmm-software7

blog.domotz.com/all/best-rmm-tools-small-business6

ittoolsguide.com/best-rmm-software-for-small-business6

aimultiple.com/rmm-software5

comparitech.com/net-admin/rmm-software-and-tools5

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Pulseway's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Pulseway, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at pulseway.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.