IT AI Index
Index Vendors › Oracle Autonomous Data Warehouse · September 2026 Edition
Oracle · 1 category · Named, not ranked

Oracle Autonomous Data Warehouse

8Judge labels
0First choices
1Negative labels
7 of 12Models named it
1Category
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
4 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Oracle Autonomous Data Warehouse was named 4 times in Data warehouses, where Snowflake led with 47%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In data warehouses · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Oracle Autonomous Data Warehouse for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Data warehousesData platform0%14 of 410%4under 10 labels · led by Snowflake at 47%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Oracle Autonomous Data Warehouse yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Oracle Autonomous Data Warehouse across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00101
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00101
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX01001
MiniMax M2.500101

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase2 labelsNone
Comparative4 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative1 labelNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative8 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Already heavily invested in Oracle (apps, DBAs) | Oracle Autonomous Data Warehouse” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Data warehouses · paraphrase prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Oracle Autonomous Data Warehouse, over the 8 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Oracle Autonomous Data Warehouse was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Snowflake8 of 85Not in the top three
Google BigQuery8 of 82Not in the top three
Amazon Redshift8 of 80Not in the top three
Azure Synapse Analytics5 of 80Not in the top three
ClickHouse Cloud5 of 80Not in the top three
Databricks5 of 80Not in the top three
Microsoft Fabric5 of 80Not in the top three
Databricks SQL3 of 80Not in the top three
IBM Db2 Warehouse3 of 80Not in the top three
Teradata Vantage3 of 80Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Oracle Autonomous Data Warehouse. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 6 of the 8 answers that named Oracle Autonomous Data Warehouse and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

atlan.com4
ovaledge.com4
recordlydata.com4
athenaworks.com3
clickhouse.com3
dev.to3
double.cloud3
medium.com3
tech-insider.org3
techplained.com3

Thirty-three of the thirty-three domain citations in answers naming Oracle Autonomous Data Warehouse came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Oracle Autonomous Data Warehouse

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Oracle Autonomous Data Warehouse; a claim can dispute any of them.
Oracle ADW 1
Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Oracle Autonomous Data Warehouse's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Oracle Autonomous Data Warehouse, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at oracle.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack