IT AI Index

Index › Vendors › SailPoint IdentityIQ · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

SailPoint IdentityIQ

20Judge labels

1First choices

16Negative labels

9 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

7 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. SailPoint IdentityIQ was named 7 times in IGA, where Lumos led with 20%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business77 of 81

under the label threshold

Mid-market76 of 77

under the label threshold

Enterprise13 of 69

under the label threshold

In iga · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named SailPoint IdentityIQ for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Identity governance	Identity and access	0%	76 of 77	71%	7	under 10 labels · led by Lumos at 20%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for SailPoint IdentityIQ yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated SailPoint IdentityIQ across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	1	1	2
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	3	3
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	1	1
MiniMax M2.5	1	0	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct1 labelNone

Paraphrase3 labels1

Comparative4 labels1not counted in share

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained2 labelsNone

Negative10 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative20 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“For regulated enterprises requiring comprehensive governance, SailPoint and Saviynt are the leading choices.” MiniMax M2.5 · IGA · comparative prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“the most common pitfall is falling into sales cycles with heavy legacy enterprise platforms (like SailPoint IdentityIQ, Saviynt, or One Identity)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · IGA · scale prompt · hard negative

“Legacy enterprise IGA platforms (like SailPoint IdentityIQ or Saviynt) are usually too complex, expensive, and slow to deploy for mid-market teams” Gemini 3.5 Flash · IGA · direct prompt · soft negative

“Established enterprise platforms include SailPoint and Saviynt, which offer deep compliance automation at the cost of implementation complexity.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · IGA · comparative prompt · soft negative

“Verdict: Be cautious if you are a mid-market company or have a lean IT/security team.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · IGA · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as SailPoint IdentityIQ, over the 20 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and SailPoint IdentityIQ was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Okta Identity Governance16 of 200Not in the top three

Saviynt Enterprise Identity Cloud13 of 200Not in the top three

Microsoft Entra ID Governance11 of 200Not in the top three

ConductorOne8 of 203Not in the top three

Lumos6 of 203Not in the top three

Oracle Identity Governance6 of 200Not in the top three

IBM ISAM5 of 200Not in the top three

Zluri5 of 200Not in the top three

Omada Identity4 of 200Not in the top three

One Identity Manager4 of 200Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named SailPoint IdentityIQ. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 15 of the 20 answers that named SailPoint IdentityIQ and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

zluri.com9

aimultiple.com7

corma.io7

gartner.com7

oneidentity.com7

startwithidentity.com7

idenhq.com6

securityboulevard.com5

credentialgovernance.avatier.com4

linx.security4

Sixty-three of the sixty-three domain citations in answers naming SailPoint IdentityIQ came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

aimultiple.com/iga-solutions7

gartner.com/reviews/market/identity-governance-administration7

oneidentity.com/learn/top-5-identity-governance-and-administration-tools-in-2025.aspx7

corma.io/blog/top-10-iam-solutions-for-smbs-and-mid-size-companies-20265

zluri.com/blog/identity-governance-and-administration-tools5

linx.security/blog/top-10-iga-tools-a-modern-identity-governance-buyers-guide4

accessowl.com/blog/buyers-guide-for-iga-tools-by-team-size3

credentialgovernance.avatier.com/en/blog/best-identity-governance-administration-solutions3

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as SailPoint IdentityIQ

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as SailPoint IdentityIQ; a claim can dispute any of them.

SailPoint IdentityIQ (IIQ) 1Sailpoint IdentityIQ 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when SailPoint IdentityIQ's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as SailPoint IdentityIQ, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at sailpoint.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.