AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Products › SailPoint IdentityIQ · October 2026 Edition
2 categories · Named, not ranked

SailPoint IdentityIQ

17Judge labels
0First choices
14Negative labels
9 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
6 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. SailPoint IdentityIQ was named 6 times in IGA and 1 other category, where Microsoft Entra ID Governance led with 25%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In iga · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named SailPoint IdentityIQ for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Identity governanceIdentity and access0%75 of 7680%5under 10 labels · led by Microsoft Entra ID Governance at 25%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Workforce identity and SSOIdentity and access0%43 of 44100%1under 10 labels · led by Microsoft Entra ID at 46%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.

Movement

Since September 2026, SailPoint IdentityIQ held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 11 points.

Best category · IGA · by segment

Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 74 → 80 of 84
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 71 → 69 of 71
Enterprise▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 11 → 51 of 70

All categories · Mid-market

CategorySeptember 2026NowChangeReadingRank
IGA0%0%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 71 → 75 of 76
Workforce identity0%0%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.New this editionRank 43 of 44, unchanged

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated SailPoint IdentityIQ across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00011
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.2000000
Mistral Small00011
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00112
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500011
GPT-6 Luna00011
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative2 labels1not counted in share
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained2 labelsNone
Negative13 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative17 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“considered over-engineered for small to mid-size companies (100-500 employees)” Llama 4 Maverick · Workforce identity · negative prompt · hard negative
“too small to justify the massive budget, long implementation timelines, and dedicated administrative overhead required by legacy enterprise ... suites like SailPoint IdentityIQ or Saviynt” Gemini 3.5 Flash · IGA · scale prompt · soft negative
“SailPoint IdentityIQ without in-house expertise or a strong implementation partner: ... customization and implementation effort are real considerations” GPT-6 Luna · IGA · negative prompt · soft negative
“Steep learning curve, cache issues during rule/workflow development, and complex licensing models.” MiniMax M2.5 · IGA · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as SailPoint IdentityIQ, over the 17 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and SailPoint IdentityIQ was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Oracle Identity Governance9 of 170Not among the top eight
Microsoft Entra ID7 of 172Not among the top eight
Okta Identity Governance7 of 171Not among the top eight
Saviynt Enterprise Identity Cloud7 of 171Not among the top eight
Microsoft Entra ID Governance5 of 170Not among the top eight
IBM ISAM4 of 170Not among the top eight
Okta3 of 172Not among the top eight
SailPoint Identity Security Cloud3 of 171Not among the top eight
JumpCloud3 of 170Not among the top eight
Okta Workforce Identity3 of 170Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named SailPoint IdentityIQ. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 15 of the 17 answers that named SailPoint IdentityIQ and are not a share of its labels.

Search and answers

sailpoint.com ranks 3 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, SailPoint IdentityIQ takes 0% of first choices and Microsoft Entra ID Governance takes 25%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “identity governance platform”
3
Position for “identity governance platforms”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
1,000 a month (“sailpoint identityiq”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
6 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 58,881 a month
Searches its site ranks for
11,032 · 741 in the top three
Sites linking to it
7,691
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
114 ads · 114 text · 46 shown in the last 30 days

First shown January 2023, as SailPoint Technologies, Inc., verified. Ads started 2025-10 to 2026-09: 44 in the year, 70 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
0%
rank 75 of 76 in IGA
Segment leader
25%
Microsoft Entra ID Governance
First choices
0 across its categories
Named in
17 answers
Its own site cited
in 15 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on sailpoint.com
14,556
subdomains included
Content
6,521
counted in the table below
Documentation
242
Product · Integration
237 · 15
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Template or tool5,73222026-08-25
Blog343132026-09-22
News or press19342026-09-22SIEM
Case study10502026-03-24
Glossary or explainer4602026-06-24GRC
Conference or event4242026-10-05
Comparison3302026-06-18
Report or ebook1402025-08-14
Webinar or virtual event702023-06-28
Podcast or video602023-12-04

Events in person

Last twelve months

As the event pages on sailpoint.com state them, read September 28, 2026.

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page sailpoint.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Names read as SailPoint IdentityIQ

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as SailPoint IdentityIQ; a claim can dispute any of them.
SailPoint IdentityIQ (IIQ) 1

Follow SailPoint IdentityIQ

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

SailPoint IdentityIQ is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
Enterprise identity governance to secure access at scale
Free plan or trial
SailPoint Discovery Trial sailpoint.com
Not stated on the pages read
Who it is for, price, starting price, integrations, certifications, hosting, customers

What SailPoint IdentityIQ's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: sailpoint.com, trust.sailpoint.com, sailpoint.com/solutions/dora, sailpoint.com/customers, sailpoint.com/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when SailPoint IdentityIQ's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as SailPoint IdentityIQ, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for SailPoint IdentityIQ by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where SailPoint IdentityIQ is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name SailPoint IdentityIQ, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at sailpoint.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.