Every category where a model named Oracle Autonomous Database for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Managed relational databases	Data platform	0%	70 of 73	50%	4	under 10 labels · led by Amazon RDS at 32%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Oracle Autonomous Database yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Oracle Autonomous Database across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	1	0	0	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	1	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	1	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	1	0	1
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct3 labels1

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative9 labels1not counted in share

Budget-constrained1 labelNone

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative7 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative21 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Choose Oracle Autonomous if you're running Oracle Database workloads and want maximum automation.” GPT-5.4 mini · Managed databases · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Only consider if you're already Oracle-committed enterprise. For anyone else, this is a trap.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Managed databases · negative prompt · hard negative

“Avoid Oracle completely unless your enterprise is legally or architecturally bound to it.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Managed databases · negative prompt · hard negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Oracle Autonomous Database, over the 21 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Oracle Autonomous Database was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Amazon RDS17 of 218Not in the top three

Amazon Aurora16 of 218Not in the top three

Azure SQL Database15 of 211Not in the top three

Google Cloud SQL15 of 211Not in the top three

AlloyDB for PostgreSQL6 of 210Not in the top three

DigitalOcean Managed Databases5 of 211Not in the top three

Neon5 of 210Not in the top three

Supabase5 of 210Not in the top three

PlanetScale4 of 211Not in the top three

Azure SQL Managed Instance4 of 210Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Oracle Autonomous Database. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 17 of the 21 answers that named Oracle Autonomous Database and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

aws.amazon.com9

gitnux.org9

cloudexpat.com8

tech-insider.org7

learn.microsoft.com6

blogs.oracle.comYour site5

cloud.google.com5

docs.aws.amazon.com5

oracle.comYour site5

docs.cloud.google.com4

Fifty-three of the sixty-three domain citations in answers naming Oracle Autonomous Database came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

gitnux.org/service/managed-database9

cloudexpat.com/compare/rds-vs-azure-sql-vs-cloud-sql8

tech-insider.org/aws-rds-vs-azure-database-vs-google-cloud-sql-20266

aws.amazon.com/rds5

infra.furybee.org/articles/managed-databases-compared4

northflank.com/blog/best-database-providers4

algoroq.io/compare-tech/rds-vs-cloud-sql-vs-azure-sql3

auxiliar.ai/database3

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Oracle Autonomous Database

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Oracle Autonomous Database; a claim can dispute any of them.

Autonomous Database 1Oracle Autonomous Database / Oracle Autonomous AI Database (Oracle Cloud) 1Oracle Cloud Autonomous Database 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Oracle Autonomous Database's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Oracle Autonomous Database, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at oracle.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.