Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 57 → 68 of 70
Oracle · 1 category · RankedOracle Autonomous Database
22Judge labels
1First choices
5Negative labels
10 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
2% in Managed databases for enterprise buyers
Rank 16 of 82 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 17% of its 6 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business72 of 74
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market16 of 82
0%6 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise6 of 92
2%13 labels
accepted challenger
In managed databases · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Oracle Autonomous Database for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Managed relational databases | Data platform | 0% | 16 of 82 | 17% | 6 | under 10 labels · led by Amazon RDS at 45% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Oracle Autonomous Database held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Managed databases · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 66 → 15 of 72
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 6 → 5 of 81
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Managed databases | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 66 → 16 of 82 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Oracle Autonomous Database across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Oracle Autonomous Database across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 labelNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative13 labelsNone
Budget-constrained2 labels1
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative6 labels1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative22 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“choose a more specialized service like PlanetScale or Oracle Autonomous Database” Perplexity Sonar · Managed databases · comparative prompt · alternative
“Pick Oracle for enterprise workloads with existing Oracle systems.” MiniMax M2.5 · Managed databases · comparative prompt · alternative
“Choose Oracle managed services for Oracle-centric workloads.” GPT-5.4 mini · Managed databases · comparative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Extremely high/complex licensing & pricing (drives migrations to open-source).<br>- Steep expertise needed” Grok 4.20 · Managed databases · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Oracle Autonomous Database, over the 22 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Oracle Autonomous Database was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Oracle Autonomous Database, over the 22 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Oracle Autonomous Database was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Oracle Autonomous Database. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 21 of the 22 answers that named Oracle Autonomous Database and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
g2.com11
aws.amazon.com10
learn.microsoft.com10
oracle.comYour site10
digitalocean.com9
it-ai-index.com9
cloud.google.com8
docs.oracle.comYour site8
northflank.com8
gitnux.org7
Seventy-two of the ninety domain citations in answers naming Oracle Autonomous Database came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
Where Oracle Autonomous Database stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.ShowHide
Search and answers
Where Oracle Autonomous Database stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimates- Searches for its name, Google
- 880 a month (“oracle autonomous database”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 32 a month
- Its own site
- It sits on Oracle's site (oracle.com), so there are no site figures for it alone
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 16 of 82 in managed databases
Segment leader
45%
Amazon RDS
- First choices
- 1 across its categories
- Named in
- 22 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 21 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Names read as Oracle Autonomous Database
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Oracle Autonomous Database; a claim can dispute any of them.
Oracle Autonomous AI Database 1
Follow Oracle Autonomous Database
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Oracle is the company behind Oracle Autonomous Database.ShowHide
The company
Oracle is the company behind Oracle Autonomous Database.
ShowHideOn record
Company records- Also from Oracle
- Oracle AI, Oracle API Gateway, Oracle API Management, Oracle Access Governance, Oracle Access Manager, Oracle Autonomous AI Database, Oracle Autonomous Data Warehouse, Oracle BPM and 44 more
In its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Develop scalable AI-powered apps with any data using built-in AI capabilities. Use your choice of large language model and deploy in any cloud or your data center.
- For
- developers; analysts; IT teams
- Price stated
- Launch the cost estimator tool oracle.com/autonomous-database
- Free plan or trial
- Oracle Cloud offers a Free Tier with a 30-day free trial and always-free services. oracle.com/autonomous-database
- Integrations claimed
- 100 oracle.com/apac/autonomous-database
- Certifications
- FedRAMP HighHIPAAPCI DSSSOC 1SOC 2
- Hosting
- OCI Public cloudExadata Cloud@CustomerOCI Dedicated RegionAWSAzureGoogle CloudMicrosoft Azureyour data center
- Not stated on the pages read
- Starting price, customers
What Oracle Autonomous Database's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: oracle.com/autonomous-database, oracle.com/apac/autonomous-database, oracle.com/asean/autonomous-database, oracle.com/latam/autonomous-database, oracle.com/autonomous-database/tools. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Oracle Autonomous Database's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Oracle Autonomous Database, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Oracle Autonomous Database by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Oracle Autonomous Database is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Oracle Autonomous Database, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.