| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI governance platforms | Data platform | 4% | 6 of 135 | 33% | 39 | criticized challenger |
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 6 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Choose OneTrust if you need a broad compliance dashboard for legal and risk teams.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · AI governance · comparative prompt · first choice
“the best choice is IBM watsonx.governance or OneTrust AI Governance” DeepSeek V4 Flash · AI governance · direct prompt · first choice
“Best overall for mid-market B2B: Credo AI or OneTrust AI Governance” GPT-5.4 mini · AI governance · direct prompt · first choice
“Go with Credo AI or OneTrust.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · AI governance · comparative prompt · first choice
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“avoid legacy giants like IBM (watsonx.governance), ServiceNow, or OneTrust” Gemini 3.5 Flash · AI governance · direct prompt · hard negative
“What to avoid ... OneTrust AI Governance – typically $50K–$200K+/year” DeepSeek V4 Flash · AI governance · budget prompt · hard negative
“Enterprise tools like OneTrust/IBM start at $3K+/month, so avoid them.” Grok 4.1 Fast · AI governance · budget prompt · hard negative
“OneTrust | Enterprise pricing | Complex implementation” Kimi K2 · AI governance · budget prompt · hard negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 110 of the 113 answers that named OneTrust AI Governance and are not a share of its labels.
284 of the 310 domain citations in answers naming OneTrust AI Governance came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What OneTrust AI Governance's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: onetrust.com/ai-governance-in-production, onetrust.com/glossary/ai-governance, onetrust.com/glossary/ai-compliance, onetrust.com/solutions/ai-governance, onetrust.com/glossary/nist-ai-risk-management. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when OneTrust AI Governance's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as OneTrust AI Governance, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for OneTrust AI Governance by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows: