Every category where a model named ModelOp Center for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
AI governance platforms	Data platform	4%	5 of 135	7%	15	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for ModelOp Center yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated ModelOp Center across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	1	0	0	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	0	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	1	0	1
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	0	0	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	1	0	0	1
Kimi K2	0	2	0	1	3
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	1	0	0	2
MiniMax M2.5	1	1	0	0	2
GPT-6 Luna	0	1	1	0	2
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	1	0	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct12 labels4

Paraphrase16 labels4

Comparative10 labelsNone

Budget-constrained2 labels1

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative6 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative46 labels in all, every segment counted; 9 of the 9 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“For most mid‑market B2B companies, ModelOp is the best starting point” GLM 4.7 FlashX · AI governance · direct prompt · first choice

“Primary Recommendation: ModelOp Center” MiniMax M2.5 · AI governance · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“ModelOp if you want industrialized, policy-driven lifecycle automation for both ML and generative AI.” Muse Glimmer 30B · AI governance · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“good when you need stronger model operations/governance for more technical ML environments” GPT-5.4 mini · AI governance · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“not a primary runtime environment for employee LLM use, real-time prompt inspection, or operational agent controls” Kimi K2 · AI governance · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as ModelOp Center, over the 46 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and ModelOp Center was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Credo AI40 of 4617Compare →

OneTrust AI Governance36 of 462Compare →

IBM watsonx.governance29 of 465Compare →

Holistic AI23 of 461Compare →

Fiddler AI15 of 460Not among the top eight

Microsoft Purview11 of 461Not among the top eight

ServiceNow AI Control Tower10 of 461Not among the top eight

Strac6 of 465Not among the top eight

Arthur AI6 of 461Not among the top eight

Arize AI6 of 460Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named ModelOp Center. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 46 of the 46 answers that named ModelOp Center and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

modelop.comYour site29

superblocks.com24

ibm.com22

bigid.com21

anaconda.com17

venn.com16

modulos.ai15

onetrust.com14

speakeasy.com14

g2.com12

155 of the 184 domain citations in answers naming ModelOp Center came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

modelop.com/ai-governance/ai-governance-companies21

bigid.com/blog/ai-governance-tools-for-enterprises20

superblocks.com/blog/ai-governance-platform19

anaconda.com/guides/ai-governance-platform-trust17

ibm.com/solutions/ai-governance16

venn.com/learn/ai-governance/ai-governance-tools16

modulos.ai/best-ai-governance-platforms14

speakeasy.com/blog/best-ai-governance-platforms-202614

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

modelop.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, ModelOp Center takes 4% of first choices and Credo AI takes 18%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “ai governance platform”

–

not in the top ten

Position for “ai governance platforms”

–

not in the top ten

Searches for its name, Google: 10 a month (“modelop center”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 0 a month
Organic visits to its site: about 1,073 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 338 · 21 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 1,352
Paid Google search: No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none

Ads on Google

None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 5 of 135 in AI governance

Segment leader

18%

Credo AI

First choices: 9 across its categories
Named in: 46 answers
Its own site cited: in 46 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on modelop.com

455

subdomains included

Content

349

counted in the table below

Documentation

Product · Integration

9 · 0

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	Latest	Categories named
Glossary or explainer	142	undated		Vector databases
Blog	131	6	2026-09-22	AI governance
Podcast or video	32	2	2026-07-28
Report or ebook	20	undated		AI governance
Conference or event	8	0	2025-10-15
Comparison	7	undated
Template or tool	4	undated
News or press	3	0	2024-08-13
Case study	1	undated
Webinar or virtual event	1	0	2024-07-23

Most recent

2026-09-22Building the control plane for ai governance modelop and sollucio partners blog
2026-09-09Secure compliant ai public sector modelop carahsoft blog
2026-07-31Modelop and manulife take the ai factory to ai4 2026 blog
2026-07-28The future of industrialized ai delivery podcast or video
2026-07-23Dave trier in reworked you cant govern the agents you cant see blog
2026-07-16Modelop kong partnership zero trust security agentic ai blog

Events in person

Last twelve months

December 10, 2025 to December 11, 2025AI Summit New YorkJavits Center, New York · exhibited

As the event pages on modelop.com state them, read October 5, 2026.

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page modelop.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.

Names read as ModelOp Center

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as ModelOp Center; a claim can dispute any of them.

ModelOp 10

Follow ModelOp Center

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

ModelOp Center is its own company.

ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Positioning: AI Governance for CAIO, CDAO, CIO, & CISOs
modelop.com/solutions/caio-cdao-cio
For: CAIO, CDAO, CIO, & CISOs
modelop.com/solutions/caio-cdao-cio
Integrations claimed: 50 modelop.com/solutions/caio-cdao-cio
Hosting: Global
Not stated on the pages read: Price, starting price, free plan or trial, certifications, customers

What ModelOp Center's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: modelop.com, modelop.com/solutions/caio-cdao-cio, modelop.com/ai-governance-software/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when ModelOp Center's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as ModelOp Center, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for ModelOp Center by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where ModelOp Center is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name ModelOp Center, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.