IT AI Index

Index › Products › Arthur AI · October 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Arthur AI

17Judge labels

1First choices

1Negative labels

9 / 14Models named it

1Category

October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

7 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Arthur AI was named 7 times in AI governance, where Credo AI led with 18%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business90 of 144

under the label threshold

Mid-market13 of 135

under the label threshold

Enterprise27 of 131

under the label threshold

In ai governance · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Arthur AI for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
AI governance platforms	Data platform	2%	13 of 135	0%	7	under 10 labels · led by Credo AI at 18%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Arthur AI yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Arthur AI across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	1	0	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	0	1
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	1	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	1	1	0	2
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	1	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	1	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct3 labelsNone

Paraphrase2 labels1

Comparative6 labelsNone

Budget-constrained2 labelsNone

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative3 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative17 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Top Recommendation: Arthur AI” Kimi K2 · AI governance · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“Arthur Shield for runtime intervention; full audit trails and root-cause analysis” Kimi K2 · AI governance · comparative prompt · alternative

“consider adding Fiddler AI or Arthur AI for advanced model monitoring” GLM 4.7 FlashX · AI governance · direct prompt · alternative

“Aporia or Arthur AI (Best for lightweight model monitoring)” Grok 4.1 Fast · AI governance · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Arthur AI, over the 17 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Arthur AI was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Credo AI14 of 175Not among the top eight

Fiddler AI13 of 170Not among the top eight

OneTrust AI Governance12 of 172Not among the top eight

IBM watsonx.governance10 of 172Not among the top eight

ModelOp Center6 of 171Not among the top eight

Holistic AI6 of 170Not among the top eight

Arize AI5 of 170Not among the top eight

Microsoft Purview4 of 170Not among the top eight

ServiceNow AI Control Tower4 of 170Not among the top eight

Collibra AI Governance3 of 170Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Arthur AI. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 16 of the 17 answers that named Arthur AI and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

superblocks.com7

agility-at-scale.com6

devopsschool.com6

difinity.ai6

modelop.com6

arthur.aiYour site5

ovaledge.com5

securityboulevard.com5

galileo.ai4

knostic.ai4

Forty-nine of the fifty-four domain citations in answers naming Arthur AI came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

agility-at-scale.com/ai/governance/ai-governance-tools-and-technology6

modelop.com/ai-governance/ai-governance-companies6

difinity.ai/blog/best-ai-governance-platforms5

securityboulevard.com/2026/08/top-ai-governance-platforms-2026-comparison-guide-kovrr5

superblocks.com/blog/ai-governance-platform5

galileo.ai/blog/best-ai-governance-platforms-regulated-industries4

knostic.ai/blog/ai-governance-platforms4

modulos.ai/best-ai-governance-platforms4

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

arthur.ai is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Arthur AI takes 2% of first choices and Credo AI takes 18%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “ai governance platform”

–

not in the top ten

Position for “ai governance platforms”

–

not in the top ten

Searches for its name, Google: 590 a month (“arthur ai”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 153 a month
Organic visits to its site: about 703 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 897 · 15 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 1,370
Paid Google search: No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none

Ads on GoogleDetailLess

15 ads · 15 text · 5 shown in the last 30 days

First shown April 2025, as Arthur AI, Inc., verified. Ads started 2025-11 to 2026-10: 14 in the year, 1 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 13 of 135 in AI governance

Segment leader

18%

Credo AI

First choices: 1 across its categories
Named in: 17 answers
Its own site cited: in 16 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on arthur.ai

140

subdomains included

Content

counted in the table below

Documentation

134

Product · Integration

0 · 0

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	2025-11 to 2026-10	Latest	Categories named
Report or ebook	2	undated

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page arthur.ai exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read October 5, 2026.

Follow Arthur AI

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Arthur AI is its own company.

ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Positioning: AI governance for everyone
arthur.ai
For: security, finance, and the teams shipping AI
arthur.ai
Customers named: AxiosUpsolveExpel
Not stated on the pages read: Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting

What Arthur AI's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: arthur.ai. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Arthur AI's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Arthur AI, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Arthur AI by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Arthur AI is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Arthur AI, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.