AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Products › Credo AI · October 2026 Edition
2 categories · Ranked

Credo AI

153Judge labels
25First choices
44Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
20% in AI governance for enterprise buyers
Rank 1 of 135 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
3 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 22% of its 49 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Credo AI →
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In ai governance · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Credo AI for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
AI governance platformsData platform18%1 of 13522%49accepted challenger
AI security platformsSecurity operations0%90 of 2330%1under 10 labels · led by SentinelOne Singularity at 11%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Credo AI yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Credo AI across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.511114
GPT-5.4 mini10001
Gemini 3.5 Flash11125
Perplexity Sonar11103
Grok 4.1 Fast21115
Mistral Small11013
DeepSeek V4 Flash01225
Llama 4 Maverick00202
Qwen 3.7 Flash22004
Kimi K212137
GLM 4.7 FlashX11002
MiniMax M2.511002
GPT-6 Luna11103
Muse Glimmer 30B30014

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct32 labels11
Paraphrase29 labels12
Comparative36 labels13not counted in share
Budget-constrained24 labels2
Scale-constrained11 labelsNone
Negative21 labels3not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative153 labels in all, every segment counted; 25 of the 41 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Excels in policy-to-code automation and compliance workflows... Best for enterprises building governance programs from scratch” Grok 4.1 Fast · AI governance · comparative prompt · first choice
“The best overall AI governance platform, pairing an AI use-case registry with regulation-mapped assessments and a policy engine” Claude Haiku 4.5 · AI governance · direct prompt · first choice
“A platform that wins on regulatory alignment (e.g., Credo AI) is not a replacement for deep production observability” Kimi K2 · AI governance · comparative prompt · first choice
“My default pick would be Credo AI if you're buying a dedicated AI-governance platform from scratch.” GPT-6 Luna · AI governance · paraphrase prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“What to Avoid (Too Expensive for Limited Budgets) ... Credo AI | $30,000-$150,000/year | Enterprise-only, quote-gated” Kimi K2 · AI governance · budget prompt · hard negative
“What to avoid (if budget is tight) - Credo AI – starts at ~$50,000/year” DeepSeek V4 Flash · AI governance · budget prompt · hard negative
“Some platforms, such as Credo AI, are strong in documentation and risk assessment but do not currently offer runtime enforcement for live AI traffic.” Mistral Small · AI governance · negative prompt · soft negative
“Has a steep learning curve for initial configuration and is primarily focused on policy and documentation rather than runtime enforcement” Claude Haiku 4.5 · AI governance · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Credo AI, over the 153 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Credo AI was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Fiddler AI50 of 1530Not among the top eight
Microsoft Purview40 of 1532Not among the top eight
Strac35 of 15320Not among the top eight
ServiceNow AI Control Tower21 of 1531Not among the top eight
Monitaur20 of 1530Not among the top eight
Lumenova AI19 of 1538Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Credo AI. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 151 of the 153 answers that named Credo AI and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

superblocks.com62
strac.io46
infomineo.com45
anaconda.com40
difinity.ai37
ibm.com36
modelop.com36
speakeasy.com36
aiopsschool.com35
peoplemanagingpeople.com33

406 of the 406 domain citations in answers naming Credo AI came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

Where Credo AI stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “ai governance platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “ai governance platforms”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
2,400 a month (“credo ai”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
59 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 9,753 a month
Searches its site ranks for
369 · 49 in the top three
Sites linking to it
1,777
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
19 ads · 18 text, 1 image · 5 shown in the last 30 days

First shown March 2023, as Credo.AI Corp, verified. Ads started 2025-11 to 2026-10: 9 in the year, 10 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
18%
rank 1 of 135 in AI governance
First choices
25
across its categories
Named in
153 answers
Its own site cited
in 151 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on credo.ai
644
subdomains included
Content
383
counted in the table below
Documentation
42
Product · Integration
7 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-11 to 2026-10LatestCategories named
Conference or event119undated
Blog115undatedGRC, AI governance
Glossary or explainer94undatedGRC
Webinar or virtual event30undated
News or press17undated
Comparison7undated
Report or ebook1undated

Events in person

Upcoming

As the event pages on credo.ai state them, read October 5, 2026.

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page credo.ai exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.

Follow Credo AI

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Credo AI is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
The trusted leader in AI governance; an enterprise AI governance platform that helps organizations manage AI systems responsibly, ensuring compliance, risk management, and ethical AI practices.
For
enterprises
Free plan or trial
No credit card required credo.ai
Integrations claimed
300 credo.ai
Certifications
SOC 2 Type IIGDPRTX-RAMPForrester Wave™ LeaderFast Company Most Innovative
Hosting
United StatesEurope
Customers named
MastercardIBMPrincipalFortune 500 organizationsAdeptIDBooz AllenDatabricksRuffalo Noel Levitz (RNL)
Not stated on the pages read
Price, starting price

What Credo AI's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: credo.ai, trust.credo.ai, credo.ai/solutions/gen-ai, credo.ai/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Credo AI's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Credo AI, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Credo AI by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Credo AI is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Credo AI, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at credo.ai is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.

Badges

Wins only: a badge exists where Credo AI is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.
ShowHide

AI models recommend Credo AI first in AI governance platforms this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.

Wide · 320 × 104 Website, beside other badges
AI models' first choice in AI governance platforms, October 2026 Edition, IT AI Recommendation Index
Show the code
<a href="https://it-ai-index.com/it-data/ai-governance-platforms/"><img src="https://it-ai-index.com/badges/2026-10/credo-ai--ai-governance-platforms-wide.svg" alt="AI models' first choice in AI governance platforms, October 2026 Edition, IT AI Recommendation Index" width="320" height="104"></a>

Copy the code as it is. The link is part of the badge: it points at the AI governance platforms standing, where the claim can be checked.

Square · 240 × 240 LinkedIn, slides
AI models' first choice in AI governance platforms, October 2026 Edition, IT AI Recommendation Index
Show the code
<a href="https://it-ai-index.com/it-data/ai-governance-platforms/"><img src="https://it-ai-index.com/badges/2026-10/credo-ai--ai-governance-platforms-square.svg" alt="AI models' first choice in AI governance platforms, October 2026 Edition, IT AI Recommendation Index" width="240" height="240"></a>

Copy the code as it is. The link is part of the badge: it points at the AI governance platforms standing, where the claim can be checked.

Compact · 200 × 56 Email signature, footer
AI models' first choice in AI governance platforms, October 2026 Edition, IT AI Recommendation Index
Show the code
<a href="https://it-ai-index.com/it-data/ai-governance-platforms/"><img src="https://it-ai-index.com/badges/2026-10/credo-ai--ai-governance-platforms-compact.svg" alt="AI models' first choice in AI governance platforms, October 2026 Edition, IT AI Recommendation Index" width="200" height="56"></a>

Copy the code as it is. The link is part of the badge: it points at the AI governance platforms standing, where the claim can be checked.

Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.