Every category where a model named Fiddler AI for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
AI governance platforms	Data platform	0%	25 of 135	4%	26	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Fiddler AI yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Fiddler AI across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	1	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	2	1	0	3
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	1	0	2
Mistral Small	1	1	0	2
DeepSeek V4 Flash	2	1	0	3
Llama 4 Maverick	0	2	0	2
Qwen 3.7 Flash	3	0	0	3
Kimi K2	1	1	1	3
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	0	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	2	0	0	2
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	2	1	0	3

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct9 labelsNone

Paraphrase9 labelsNone

Comparative23 labelsNone

Budget-constrained5 labelsNone

Scale-constrained8 labelsNone

Negative7 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative61 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“If you are a development team deploying custom or fine-tuned LLMs ... Go with Fiddler AI or Arthur AI.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · AI governance · comparative prompt · alternative

“Specializes in observability and runtime monitoring... suits data science/ML teams needing real-time insights” Grok 4.1 Fast · AI governance · comparative prompt · alternative

“Fiddler AI could be a better starting point due to its flexible pricing and strong monitoring capabilities” MiniMax M2.5 · AI governance · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“AI observability specialist and now positioned as an AI control plane for the enterprise agent workforce” Muse Glimmer 30B · AI governance · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Strong for production model behavior monitoring (drift, bias, hallucination detection), but this is a narrower scope than full lifecycle governance.” Kimi K2 · AI governance · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Fiddler AI, over the 61 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Fiddler AI was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Credo AI50 of 6117Not among the top eight

IBM watsonx.governance39 of 613Not among the top eight

OneTrust AI Governance37 of 613Not among the top eight

Holistic AI30 of 610Not among the top eight

Microsoft Purview20 of 611Not among the top eight

ModelOp Center15 of 615Not among the top eight

Arize AI13 of 611Not among the top eight

Arthur AI13 of 611Not among the top eight

Collibra11 of 610Not among the top eight

Monitaur11 of 610Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Fiddler AI. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 55 of the 61 answers that named Fiddler AI and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

superblocks.com33

speakeasy.com21

ovaledge.com19

devopsschool.com18

difinity.ai17

modelop.com17

bigid.com16

agility-at-scale.com14

anaconda.com14

upguard.com14

183 of the 183 domain citations in answers naming Fiddler AI came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

superblocks.com/blog/ai-governance-platform31

speakeasy.com/blog/best-ai-governance-platforms-202621

ovaledge.com/blog/ai-governance-tools18

modelop.com/ai-governance/ai-governance-companies16

bigid.com/blog/ai-governance-tools-for-enterprises15

devopsschool.com/blog/top-10-ai-governance-platforms-features-pros-cons-comparison15

agility-at-scale.com/ai/governance/ai-governance-tools-and-technology14

anaconda.com/guides/ai-governance-platform-trust14

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

fiddler.ai is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Fiddler AI takes 0% of first choices and Credo AI takes 18%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “ai governance platform”

–

not in the top ten

Position for “ai governance platforms”

–

not in the top ten

Searches for its name, Google: 1,600 a month (“fiddler ai”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 35 a month
Organic visits to its site: about 2,175 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 711 · 48 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 2,127
Paid Google search: No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none

Ads on GoogleDetailLess

46 ads · 25 video, 17 text, 4 image · 25 shown in the last 30 days

First shown December 2021, as Fiddler Labs, verified. Ads started 2025-11 to 2026-10: 27 in the year, 19 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 25 of 135 in AI governance

Segment leader

18%

Credo AI

First choices: 0 across its categories
Named in: 61 answers
Its own site cited: in 55 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on fiddler.ai

1,076

subdomains included

Content

469

counted in the table below

Documentation

553

Product · Integration

7 · 2

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	Latest	Categories named
Blog	313	90	2026-10-01	Observability, APM
Webinar or virtual event	42	6	2026-10-01	GRC, Observability
Podcast or video	40	31	2026-10-01	GRC
Glossary or explainer	23	5	2026-10-01
Comparison	14	6	2026-10-01
Report or ebook	12	undated
Case study	10	undated
Conference or event	10	4	2026-10-01
News or press	3	undated
Template or tool	2	0	2026-05-12

Most recent

2026-10-013 benefits of model monitoring and explainable ai before deployment blog
2026-10-015 things to know about ml model performance blog
2026-10-0191 percent of ml models degrade over time blog
2026-10-01A maturity model for ai ethics blog
2026-10-01A practical guide to adversarial robustness blog
2026-10-01Accelerating the production of ai solutions with fiddler and databricks integration blog

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page fiddler.ai exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.

Names read as Fiddler AI

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Fiddler AI; a claim can dispute any of them.

Fiddler 2

Follow Fiddler AI

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Fiddler AI is its own company.

ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Positioning: The AI Control Plane for enterprises
fiddler.ai
For: Enterprise teams evaluating Fiddler for agentic and predictive AI deployments
fiddler.ai
Price stated: The Free plan includes real-time guardrails powered by Fiddler Centor Models at under 80ms latency. The Developer plan is usage-based at $0.002 per trace. The Enterprise plan adds enterprise-grade guardrails, flexible deployment (SaaS, VPC, or on-premises), infrastructure scalability, and white-glove support with a named Customer Success Manager and customized onboarding. fiddler.ai
Starting price: 0.002 fiddler.ai
Free plan or trial: The Free plan includes real-time guardrails powered by Fiddler Centor Models at under 80ms latency. fiddler.ai
Certifications: SOC2 Type IIHIPAASOC2 Type 2 compliantHIPAA ready
Hosting: SaaSVPCon-premisesAWS GovCloudany secure cloud environment (VPC)air-gapped
Customers named: NielsenLeading Financial Services InstitutionLeading Healthcare PayerLeading Insurance CarrierIntegral Ad ScienceLeading Consumer Lending PlatformLeading Gig MarketplaceLeading Healthcare Enterprise
Not stated on the pages read: Integrations

What Fiddler AI's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: fiddler.ai, fiddler.ai/pricing, fiddler.ai/security, fiddler.ai/solutions/insurance, fiddler.ai/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Fiddler AI's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Fiddler AI, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Fiddler AI by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Fiddler AI is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Fiddler AI, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.