Identity governance · October 2026 Edition
Okta Identity Governance vs ConductorOne
Two of fourteen models named Okta Identity Governance first on the direct prompt; one named ConductorOne. Okta Identity Governance was named by twelve of the fourteen models and ConductorOne by eight and Okta Identity Governance carries 34 labels and ConductorOne 15, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in three categories this edition.
Named in two categories this edition.
First-choice share8%5%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate24%13%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#4#6A position in a field of 13; printed, not drawn.
Labels3415A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Okta Identity Governance reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Microsoft Entra ID Governance was named alongside these two in nine of the fourteen direct answers. Microsoft Entra ID Governance vs Okta Identity Governance · Microsoft Entra ID Governance vs ConductorOne · Lumos vs Okta Identity Governance
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the identity governance page.
By framing
How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
Okta Identity GovernanceFirst choices, of fourteen modelsConductorOne
Direct21
Paraphrase11
Comparative00
Budget-constrained103 against Okta Identity Governance
Scale-constrained11
Negative005 against Okta Identity Governance · 2 against ConductorOne
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.
Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, Okta Identity Governance and ConductorOne were named in the same answer twenty-one times, of the 100 answers naming Okta Identity Governance and the 46 naming ConductorOne. In those answers ConductorOne took the first choice three times and Okta Identity Governance two.
Every model, every framing
The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Okta Identity Governance and ConductorOne stood in it.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | | |||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | ||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | | |
| Perplexity Sonar | | |||||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | | | | |||
| Mistral Small | | |||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | | | |
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | ||||
| Kimi K2 | | |||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | | |||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | ||||
| GPT-6 Luna | | | ||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | | | | |
Okta Identity Governance ConductorOne first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Okta Identity Governance on the left and ConductorOne on the right.The direct prompt
The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Okta Identity Governance and ConductorOne stood in it.
Okta Identity Governance first, ConductorOne not the choice
2 of 14 modelsConductorOne was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.GPT-5.4 miniOkta Identity Governance alternatives: Microsoft Entra ID Governance, SailPoint Identity Security Cloud
Mistral SmallOkta Identity Governance, SailPoint Identity Security Cloud alternatives: Lumos, Saviynt Enterprise Identity Cloud
ConductorOne first, Okta Identity Governance not the choice
1 of 14 modelsOkta Identity Governance was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Qwen 3.7 FlashConductorOne, Lumos alternatives: Microsoft Entra ID Governance, tenfold
Neither was the first choice, one was named
5 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Claude Haiku 4.5no first choice alternatives: ConductorOne, Lumos, Omada Identity, Zluri, tenfold
Gemini 3.5 FlashC1, Lumos alternatives: AccessOwl, Corma, Microsoft Entra ID Governance, Okta Identity Governance, Zilla Security
Grok 4.1 FastSaviynt Enterprise Identity Cloud alternatives: ConductorOne, Microsoft Entra ID Governance, One Identity Manager, SailPoint Identity Security Cloud, Tools4ever HelloID
DeepSeek V4 FlashMicrosoft Entra ID Governance alternatives: ConductorOne, Okta Identity Governance, Omada Identity
GPT-6 LunaMicrosoft Entra ID Governance alternatives: ConductorOne, Okta Identity Governance, SailPoint Identity Security Cloud, Saviynt Enterprise Identity Cloud
Neither was named
6 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Perplexity SonarLumos alternatives: Microsoft Entra ID Governance, Omada Identity, SailPoint Identity Security Cloud, Saviynt Enterprise Identity Cloud
Llama 4 MaverickOmada Identity alternatives: One Identity Manager
Kimi K2Omada Identity alternatives: Microsoft Entra ID Governance, Netwrix Identity Manager, SailPoint Identity Security Cloud, Saviynt Enterprise Identity Cloud
GLM 4.7 FlashXMicrosoft Entra ID Governance alternatives: Iden, Omada Identity, One Identity Manager, SailPoint Identity Security Cloud, Saviynt Enterprise Identity Cloud, Zluri, tenfold
MiniMax M2.5Omada Identity, Zluri alternatives: SailPoint Identity Security Cloud, Tools4ever HelloID
Muse Glimmer 30BLumos alternatives: Iden, Linx, Omada Identity, One Identity Manager, Opal Security, Zluri
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Okta Identity Governance leads by two points.
Okta Identity Governance6%#5 of 12ConductorOne5%#6 of 12Mid-marketThe figures above
Okta Identity Governance leads by three points.
Okta Identity Governance8%#4 of 13ConductorOne5%#6 of 13Enterprise
Okta Identity Governance leads by two points.
Okta Identity Governance4%#4 of 8ConductorOne2%#– of 8What the models said about Okta Identity Governance
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“More expensive (~$6+/user/month), but if you're already on Okta for SSO, the governance add-on may be cheaper” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · soft negative
“This is not a viable standalone IGA platform, has limited advanced controls compared to dedicated vendors” Claude Haiku 4.5 · negative prompt · soft negative
“Limited functionality with non-Okta systems; Complex workflows still require custom coding” MiniMax M2.5 · negative prompt · soft negative
“Start by getting a quote for Entra ID Governance or Okta Identity Governance. This will usually be your fastest and most cost-effective setup.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
“If Okta is your identity provider, Okta Identity Governance keeps everything on one directory and policy model.” Muse Glimmer 30B · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“the best default choice is usually Okta Identity Governance” GPT-5.4 mini · direct prompt · first choice
What the models said about ConductorOne
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Five of six in this category shown.
“Outages at scale, coverage gaps ... CEL query complexity, add-on pricing.” Grok 4.1 Fast · negative prompt · soft negative
“these lightweight tools will struggle to bridge the gap” Gemini 3.5 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“Zluri, Lumos, ConductorOne — Built for mid-market; faster deployments ($), lower administrative burden” Qwen 3.7 Flash · scale prompt · first choice
“I'd recommend ConductorOne as a strong starting point.” Grok 4.1 Fast · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Recommendation: Lumos or ConductorOne” Qwen 3.7 Flash · direct prompt · first choice
Also compared
Microsoft Entra ID Governance vs Okta Identity GovernanceMicrosoft Entra ID Governance vs ConductorOneLumos vs Okta Identity GovernanceLumos vs ConductorOneOmada Identity vs Okta Identity GovernanceOmada Identity vs ConductorOneOkta Identity Governance vs ZluriOkta Identity Governance vs One Identity ManagerOkta Identity Governance vs JumpCloudZluri vs ConductorOneConductorOne vs One Identity ManagerConductorOne vs JumpCloudAll twenty-eight head-to-head pages and the full IGA standing
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.