Insider risk management · October 2026 Edition
Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management vs Teramind
Two of fourteen models named Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management first on the direct prompt; one named Teramind. Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management was named by thirteen of the fourteen models and Teramind by thirteen and Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management carries 36 labels and Teramind 33, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management
accepted challengerNamed in one category this edition.
Named in one category this edition.
First-choice share22%2%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate3%27%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#1#6A position in a field of 12; printed, not drawn.
Labels3633A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Code42 Incydr was named alongside these two in eight of the fourteen direct answers. Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management vs Above Security · Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management vs Code42 Incydr · Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management vs Proofpoint Insider Threat Management
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the insider risk management page.
By framing
How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
Microsoft Purview Insider Risk ManagementFirst choices, of fourteen modelsTeramind
Direct211 against Teramind
Paraphrase202 against Teramind
Comparative401 against Teramind
Budget-constrained50
Scale-constrained10
Negative001 against Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management · 5 against Teramind
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.
Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management and Teramind were named in the same answer sixty-six times, of the 121 answers naming Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management and the 111 naming Teramind. In those answers Teramind took the first choice five times and Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management thirty-eight.
Every model, every framing
The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management and Teramind stood in it.
| Model | DirectMP | ParaphraseMP | ComparativeMP | Budget-constrainedMP | Scale-constrainedMP | NegativeMP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | MP | |||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | MP | MP | MP | MP | ||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | MP | | MP | MP | ||
| Perplexity Sonar | MP | MP | MP | |||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | MP | MP | | MP | MP | |
| Mistral Small | MP | |||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | MP | MP | MP | | ||
| Llama 4 Maverick | | |||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | ||||||
| Kimi K2 | MP | MP | MP | | ||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | MP | | MP | MP | ||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | MP | ||||
| GPT-6 Luna | MP | MP | MP | MP | ||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | MP | |
MP Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management TeramindMP first choiceMP named as an alternativeMP argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management on the left and Teramind on the right.
TeramindMP first choiceMP named as an alternativeMP argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management on the left and Teramind on the right.The direct prompt
The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management and Teramind stood in it.
Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management first, Teramind an alternative
2 of 14 modelsTeramind was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.GPT-5.4 miniMicrosoft Purview Insider Risk Management alternatives: Teramind, Varonis Data Security Platform
Kimi K2Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management alternatives: Code42 Incydr, DTEX InTERCEPT, Proofpoint Insider Threat Management
Teramind first, Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management an alternative
1 of 14 modelsMicrosoft Purview Insider Risk Management was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Claude Haiku 4.5Teramind alternatives: Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management, Proofpoint Insider Threat Management, Varonis Data Security Platform
Neither was the first choice, one was named
7 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Gemini 3.5 FlashCyberhaven alternatives: Code42 Incydr, Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management, Safetica, Teramind
Perplexity SonarAbove Security alternatives: Code42 Incydr, Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management, Proofpoint Insider Threat Management, Varonis Data Security Platform
Grok 4.1 FastCode42 Incydr, Proofpoint Insider Threat Management alternatives: DTEX InTERCEPT, Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management, Safetica
DeepSeek V4 FlashCode42 Incydr alternatives: Above Security, Coro Insider Risk, Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management
GLM 4.7 FlashXSafetica Intelligent Data Security Platform alternatives: Code42 Incydr, Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management, Teramind
MiniMax M2.5Above Security, Safetica alternatives: Teramind, UpGuard
GPT-6 LunaCode42 Incydr alternatives: Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management, Teramind
Neither was named
4 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Mistral SmallAbove Security alternatives: Code42, DTEX Systems
Llama 4 MaverickAbove Security alternatives: Code42, DTEX InTERCEPT, Gurucul, Securonix UEBA
Qwen 3.7 FlashAbove Security alternatives: DTEX InTERCEPT, Microsoft Purview
Muse Glimmer 30BAbove Security alternatives: Code42 Incydr
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management leads by fifteen points.
Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management25%#1 of 11
Teramind11%#4 of 11Mid-marketThe figures above
Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management leads by twenty points.
Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management22%#1 of 12
Teramind2%#6 of 12Enterprise
Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management leads by forty-two points.
Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management44%#1 of 13
Teramind2%#11 of 13What the models said about Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.
“Potential concerns: Limited visibility outside the Microsoft ecosystem; weaker AI intent reasoning; partial ecosystem coverage.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · negative prompt · soft negative
“Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management if you are already Microsoft centric and need compliance-focused detection, investigation and policy controls.” Muse Glimmer 30B · scale prompt · first choice
“the strongest fit in these results is Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management *if your company already has Microsoft 365 E5*” Perplexity Sonar · budget prompt · first choice
“If your company is already paying for Microsoft 365 E5 licenses, Microsoft Purview is your default best choice.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
What the models said about Teramind
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Teramind, Veriato, and Coro/Metomic, which are not recommended for large enterprises due to performance issues or limited features” Llama 4 Maverick · negative prompt · hard negative
“Teramind consistently draws the most mixed feedback of the major IRM platforms: Poor customer support” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · hard negative
“Heavily employee-surveillance focused ... high privacy/HR risk for a B2B company” DeepSeek V4 Flash · paraphrase prompt · hard negative
“Ideal for mid-market organizations (100-2,000 employees) seeking comprehensive employee monitoring for insider threat and productivity tracking” Claude Haiku 4.5 · direct prompt · first choice
“Teramind is worth evaluating if you specifically need endpoint activity monitoring and forensic detail, but it is more employee-monitoring-oriented” GPT-6 Luna · budget prompt · alternative
“Consider it if you specifically need detailed endpoint/user-activity monitoring; assess the employee-privacy and governance implications” GPT-6 Luna · direct prompt · alternative
Also compared
Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management vs Above SecurityMicrosoft Purview Insider Risk Management vs Code42 IncydrMicrosoft Purview Insider Risk Management vs Proofpoint Insider Threat ManagementMicrosoft Purview Insider Risk Management vs Microsoft PurviewMicrosoft Purview Insider Risk Management vs CyberhavenAbove Security vs TeramindCode42 Incydr vs TeramindProofpoint Insider Threat Management vs TeramindMicrosoft Purview vs TeramindTeramind vs CyberhavenAll twenty-one head-to-head pages and the full insider risk standing
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.