AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Security operations › Insider risk › Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management vs Above Security
Insider risk management · October 2026 Edition

Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management vs Above Security

Two of fourteen models named Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management first on the direct prompt; six named Above Security. Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management was named by thirteen of the fourteen models and Above Security by eleven and Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management carries 36 labels and Above Security 15, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Named in one category this edition.

Above Security

accepted challenger

Named in one category this edition.

First-choice share22%17%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate3%0%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#1#2A position in a field of 12; printed, not drawn.
Labels3615A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Code42 Incydr was named alongside these two in eight of the fourteen direct answers. Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management vs Code42 Incydr · Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management vs Proofpoint Insider Threat Management · Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management vs Microsoft Purview

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the insider risk management page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
Microsoft Purview Insider Risk ManagementFirst choices, of fourteen modelsAbove Security
Direct26
Paraphrase21
Comparative40
Budget-constrained50
Scale-constrained11
Negative001 against Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management and Above Security were named in the same answer twenty times, of the 121 answers naming Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management and the 52 naming Above Security. In those answers Above Security took the first choice five times and Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management nine.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management and Above Security stood in it.
ModelDirectMPParaphraseMPComparativeMPBudget-constrainedMPScale-constrainedMPNegativeMP
Claude Haiku 4.5MP
GPT-5.4 miniMPMPMPMP
Gemini 3.5 FlashMPMPMP
Perplexity SonarMPMPMP
Grok 4.1 FastMPMPMPMP
Mistral SmallMP
DeepSeek V4 FlashMPMPMP
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2MPMPMP
GLM 4.7 FlashXMPMPMP
MiniMax M2.5MP
GPT-6 LunaMPMPMPMP
Muse Glimmer 30BMP
MP Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management Above SecurityMP first choiceMP named as an alternativeMP argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management on the left and Above Security on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management and Above Security stood in it.

Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management first, Above Security not the choice

2 of 14 modelsAbove Security was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
GPT-5.4 miniMicrosoft Purview Insider Risk Management alternatives: Teramind, Varonis Data Security Platform
Kimi K2Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management alternatives: Code42 Incydr, DTEX InTERCEPT, Proofpoint Insider Threat Management

Above Security first, Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management an alternative

6 of 14 modelsMicrosoft Purview Insider Risk Management was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Perplexity SonarAbove Security alternatives: Code42 Incydr, Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management, Proofpoint Insider Threat Management, Varonis Data Security Platform
Mistral SmallAbove Security alternatives: Code42, DTEX Systems
Llama 4 MaverickAbove Security alternatives: Code42, DTEX InTERCEPT, Gurucul, Securonix UEBA
Qwen 3.7 FlashAbove Security alternatives: DTEX InTERCEPT, Microsoft Purview
MiniMax M2.5Above Security, Safetica alternatives: Teramind, UpGuard
Muse Glimmer 30BAbove Security alternatives: Code42 Incydr

Neither was the first choice, one was named

6 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Claude Haiku 4.5Teramind alternatives: Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management, Proofpoint Insider Threat Management, Varonis Data Security Platform
Gemini 3.5 FlashCyberhaven alternatives: Code42 Incydr, Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management, Safetica, Teramind
Grok 4.1 FastCode42 Incydr, Proofpoint Insider Threat Management alternatives: DTEX InTERCEPT, Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management, Safetica
DeepSeek V4 FlashCode42 Incydr alternatives: Above Security, Coro Insider Risk, Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management
GLM 4.7 FlashXSafetica Intelligent Data Security Platform alternatives: Code42 Incydr, Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management, Teramind
GPT-6 LunaCode42 Incydr alternatives: Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management, Teramind

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management leads by eighteen points.
Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management25%#1 of 11
Above Security7%#5 of 11
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management leads by four points.
Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management22%#1 of 12
Above Security17%#2 of 12
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management leads by forty points.
Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management44%#1 of 13
Above Security4%#6 of 13
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.

“Potential concerns: Limited visibility outside the Microsoft ecosystem; weaker AI intent reasoning; partial ecosystem coverage.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · negative prompt · soft negative
“Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management if you are already Microsoft centric and need compliance-focused detection, investigation and policy controls.” Muse Glimmer 30B · scale prompt · first choice
“the strongest fit in these results is Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management *if your company already has Microsoft 365 E5*” Perplexity Sonar · budget prompt · first choice
“If your company is already paying for Microsoft 365 E5 licenses, Microsoft Purview is your default best choice.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · budget prompt · first choice

What the models said about Above Security

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of four in this category shown.

“Above Security - Best for prevention-focused organizations, SaaS data security, quick deployment” GLM 4.7 FlashX · scale prompt · first choice
“Above Security is widely considered the best insider risk management tool currently available.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · direct prompt · first choice
“the best insider risk management tool for a mid-market B2B company is Above Security” Mistral Small · direct prompt · first choice
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.