AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Products › Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining · October 2026 Edition
Microsoft · 1 category · Ranked

Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining

62Judge labels
21First choices
9Negative labels
12 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
20% in Process mining for enterprise buyers
Rank 2 of 61 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
4 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 14% of its 21 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining →
By buyer segmentStrongest at enterprise.
In process mining · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Process miningIT operations and endpoint14%2 of 6114%21accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.501001
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash22015
Perplexity Sonar21003
Grok 4.1 Fast01001
Mistral Small00011
DeepSeek V4 Flash11002
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K220002
GLM 4.7 FlashX01001
MiniMax M2.501001
GPT-6 Luna11013
Muse Glimmer 30B01001

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct10 labels6
Paraphrase7 labels3
Comparative18 labels3not counted in share
Budget-constrained18 labels11
Scale-constrained1 label1
Negative8 labels1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative62 labels in all, every segment counted; 21 of the 25 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Best for Microsoft-Centric Companies: Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining ... this is the most seamless and cost-effective commercial option.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Process mining · budget prompt · first choice
“Best Overall & Best for Microsoft Ecosystems: Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining (formerly Minit)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Process mining · direct prompt · first choice
“UiPath Process Mining or Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining are the safest bets” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Process mining · direct prompt · first choice
“the strongest low-cost choice is usually Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining” Perplexity Sonar · Process mining · budget prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Avoid or be cautious with Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining if you expect high volumes” Mistral Small · Process mining · negative prompt · hard negative
“I wouldn’t start with Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining if the budget is especially tight” GPT-6 Luna · Process mining · budget prompt · soft negative
“it can carry heavy add-on licensing costs (such as a $5,000/month tenant capacity add-on)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Process mining · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining, over the 62 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Mindzie11 of 622Not among the top eight
ProcessMind11 of 622Not among the top eight
Fluxicon Disco9 of 622Not among the top eight
QPR ProcessAnalyzer8 of 621Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 62 of the 62 answers that named Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

processmind.com36
bardeen.ai34
guideflow.com30
erpresearch.com27
superkind.ai27
kyp.ai25
g2.com23
us.fitgap.com22
microsoft.comYour site20
dupple.com19

243 of the 263 domain citations in answers naming Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

Where Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Searches for its name, Google
50 a month (“microsoft power automate process mining”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
2 a month
Its own site
It sits on Microsoft's site (microsoft.com), so there are no site figures for it alone

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
14%
rank 2 of 61 in process mining
Segment leader
19%
Apromore
First choices
21 across its categories
Named in
62 answers
Its own site cited
in 62 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

Follow Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Microsoft is the company behind Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
Optimice los procesos empresariales con una solución de automatización de un extremo a otro creada para empresas.
Price stated
13,00 € usuario al mes, pagado anualmente; 130,00 € bot al mes, pagado anualmente microsoft.com/es-es/power-platform/products/power-automate
Free plan or trial
Experimente Power Automate, incluidas las características premium, gratis durante 30 días. microsoft.com/es-es/power-platform/products/power-automate
Certifications
conectores certificados precompiladosyli 1 400 valmista sertifioitua liitintä
Customers named
NsureUberCoreLogicBrisa
Not stated on the pages read
Hosting

What Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: microsoft.com/de-de/power-platform/products/power-automate, microsoft.com/es-es/power-platform/products/power-automate, microsoft.com/fi-fi/power-platform/products/power-automate, microsoft.com/fr-fr/power-platform/products/power-automate, microsoft.com/hu-hu/power-platform/products/power-automate. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at microsoft.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.

Badges

Wins only: a badge exists where Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.
ShowHide

Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining is among the products AI models recommend first in Process mining this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.

Wide · 320 × 104 Website, beside other badges
Among AI models' top three in Process mining, October 2026 Edition, IT AI Recommendation Index
Show the code
<a href="https://it-ai-index.com/operations/process-mining/"><img src="https://it-ai-index.com/badges/2026-10/microsoft-power-automate-process-mining--process-mining-wide.svg" alt="Among AI models' top three in Process mining, October 2026 Edition, IT AI Recommendation Index" width="320" height="104"></a>

Copy the code as it is. The link is part of the badge: it points at the Process mining standing, where the claim can be checked.

Square · 240 × 240 LinkedIn, slides
Among AI models' top three in Process mining, October 2026 Edition, IT AI Recommendation Index
Show the code
<a href="https://it-ai-index.com/operations/process-mining/"><img src="https://it-ai-index.com/badges/2026-10/microsoft-power-automate-process-mining--process-mining-square.svg" alt="Among AI models' top three in Process mining, October 2026 Edition, IT AI Recommendation Index" width="240" height="240"></a>

Copy the code as it is. The link is part of the badge: it points at the Process mining standing, where the claim can be checked.

Compact · 200 × 56 Email signature, footer
Among AI models' top three in Process mining, October 2026 Edition, IT AI Recommendation Index
Show the code
<a href="https://it-ai-index.com/operations/process-mining/"><img src="https://it-ai-index.com/badges/2026-10/microsoft-power-automate-process-mining--process-mining-compact.svg" alt="Among AI models' top three in Process mining, October 2026 Edition, IT AI Recommendation Index" width="200" height="56"></a>

Copy the code as it is. The link is part of the badge: it points at the Process mining standing, where the claim can be checked.

Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.