Index › IT operations and endpoint › Process mining › Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining vs UiPath Process Mining
Process mining · October 2026 Edition
Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining vs UiPath Process Mining
Four of fourteen models named Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining first on the direct prompt; two named UiPath Process Mining. Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining was named by eleven of the fourteen models and UiPath Process Mining by fourteen and Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining carries 21 labels and UiPath Process Mining 50, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining
accepted challengerNamed in one category this edition.
Named in one category this edition.
First-choice share14%10%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate14%10%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#2#4A position in a field of 9; printed, not drawn.
Labels2150A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Apromore vs Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining · Apromore vs UiPath Process Mining · Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining vs IBM Process Mining
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the process mining page.
By framing
How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
Microsoft Power Automate Process MiningFirst choices, of fourteen modelsUiPath Process Mining
Direct421 against UiPath Process Mining
Paraphrase13
Comparative00
Budget-constrained201 against Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining
Scale-constrained11
Negative002 against Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining · 4 against UiPath Process Mining
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.
Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining and UiPath Process Mining were named in the same answer forty-one times, of the 62 answers naming Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining and the 152 naming UiPath Process Mining. In those answers UiPath Process Mining took the first choice zero times and Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining seventeen.
Every model, every framing
The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining and UiPath Process Mining stood in it.
| Model | DirectMP | ParaphraseMP | ComparativeMP | Budget-constrainedMP | Scale-constrainedMP | NegativeMP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | MP | |||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | | |||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | MP | MP | MP | MP | | MP |
| Perplexity Sonar | MP | MP | MP | |||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | | | MP | | | |
| Mistral Small | | | MP | |||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | MP | | MP | | | |
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | ||||
| Kimi K2 | MP | | | MP | ||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | MP | | |||
| MiniMax M2.5 | MP | | | | ||
| GPT-6 Luna | | MP | MP | MP | ||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | MP | | |
MP Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining UiPath Process MiningMP first choiceMP named as an alternativeMP argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining on the left and UiPath Process Mining on the right.
UiPath Process MiningMP first choiceMP named as an alternativeMP argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining on the left and UiPath Process Mining on the right.The direct prompt
The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining and UiPath Process Mining stood in it.
Both were the first choice
1 of 14 modelsThe answer named them together, and the judge labeled each a first choice.DeepSeek V4 FlashMicrosoft Power Automate Process Mining, UiPath Process Mining alternatives: Mindzie, Minit, ProcessMind
Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining first, UiPath Process Mining an alternative
3 of 14 modelsUiPath Process Mining was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Gemini 3.5 FlashMicrosoft Power Automate Process Mining alternatives: Apromore, KYP.ai, UiPath Process Mining
Perplexity SonarMicrosoft Power Automate Process Mining alternatives: SAP Signavio Process Intelligence, UiPath Process Mining
Kimi K2Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining, Mindzie alternatives: Apromore, MEHRWERK, QPR ProcessAnalyzer
UiPath Process Mining first, Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining not the choice
1 of 14 modelsMicrosoft Power Automate Process Mining was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.GPT-5.4 miniUiPath Process Mining alternatives: Celonis Process Intelligence Platform, SAP Signavio Process Intelligence
Neither was the first choice, one was named
6 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Grok 4.1 FastMicrosoft Power Automate alternatives: Apromore, UiPath Process Mining
Mistral SmallCelonis Process Intelligence Platform alternatives: SAP Signavio Process Intelligence, UiPath Process Mining
Qwen 3.7 FlashEverflow Process Intelligence, ProcessMaker alternatives: SAP Signavio Process Intelligence, UiPath Process Mining
MiniMax M2.5Apromore, Celonis Process Intelligence Platform alternatives: IBM Process Mining, Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining, UiPath Process Mining
GPT-6 LunaApromore alternatives: Power Automate Process Mining, SAP Signavio Process Intelligence, UiPath Process Mining
Muse Glimmer 30BDecisions, ProcessMaker alternatives: Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining, Noxus
Neither was named
3 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Claude Haiku 4.5Microsoft Power Automate alternatives: Apromore, ProcessMind, QPR ProcessAnalyzer
Llama 4 MaverickProcessMaker
GLM 4.7 FlashXMindzie alternatives: ABBYY Timeline, Apromore, Microsoft Power Automate
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining leads by six points.
Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining8%#4 of 12
UiPath Process Mining2%#9 of 12Mid-marketThe figures above
Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining leads by three points.
Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining14%#2 of 9
UiPath Process Mining10%#4 of 9Enterprise
Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining leads by twenty points.
Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining20%#2 of 8
UiPath Process Mining0%#5 of 8What the models said about Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of seven in this category shown.
“Avoid or be cautious with Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining if you expect high volumes” Mistral Small · negative prompt · hard negative
“I wouldn’t start with Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining if the budget is especially tight” GPT-6 Luna · budget prompt · soft negative
“it can carry heavy add-on licensing costs (such as a $5,000/month tenant capacity add-on)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“Best for Microsoft-Centric Companies: Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining ... this is the most seamless and cost-effective commercial option.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
“Best Overall & Best for Microsoft Ecosystems: Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining (formerly Minit)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · direct prompt · first choice
“UiPath Process Mining or Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining are the safest bets” DeepSeek V4 Flash · direct prompt · first choice
What the models said about UiPath Process Mining
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“standalone mining feels limited. Enterprise pricing ($24K–$200K+ annually reported) and integration complexity for non-RPA users.” Grok 4.1 Fast · negative prompt · soft negative
“Verdict: Be cautious, particularly if you need robust data connectivity or accurate process analytics out of the box.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“Caution: be cautious if you do not already use UiPath RPA, have messy/unstructured event logs and limited ETL capacity” Muse Glimmer 30B · negative prompt · soft negative
“I'd usually recommend UiPath Process Intelligence if you want the best balance of discovery, automation follow-through, and scalability” GPT-5.4 mini · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“UiPath Process Mining | Automation teams, RPA integration | $25/user/mo | 4.4/5” Grok 4.1 Fast · scale prompt · first choice
“Best overall for many mid-market B2B firms: UiPath Process Mining” GPT-5.4 mini · direct prompt · first choice
Also compared
Apromore vs Microsoft Power Automate Process MiningApromore vs UiPath Process MiningMicrosoft Power Automate Process Mining vs IBM Process MiningMicrosoft Power Automate Process Mining vs Microsoft Power AutomateMicrosoft Power Automate Process Mining vs SAP Signavio Process IntelligenceMicrosoft Power Automate Process Mining vs Celonis Process Intelligence PlatformMicrosoft Power Automate Process Mining vs PM4PyIBM Process Mining vs UiPath Process MiningUiPath Process Mining vs Microsoft Power AutomateUiPath Process Mining vs SAP Signavio Process IntelligenceUiPath Process Mining vs Celonis Process Intelligence PlatformUiPath Process Mining vs PM4PyAll twenty-eight head-to-head pages and the full process mining standing
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.