| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Process mining | IT operations and endpoint | 3% | 10 of 61 | 52% | 64 | criticized challenger |
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 1 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 6 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 5 |
| Mistral Small | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 6 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 6 |
| Kimi K2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 5 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 5 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 5 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“The undisputed heavyweight market leader... If you have a highly complex, multi-vendor IT architecture and a large budget... Choose Celonis.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Process mining · comparative prompt · first choice
“Celonis — The Market Leader ... Key Differentiator: Deep execution management with AI-powered recommendations and the broadest ecosystem” Kimi K2 · Process mining · comparative prompt · first choice
“Celonis remains the undisputed heavyweight, commanding a 31.2% market share through its sophisticated Execution Management System (EMS)” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Process mining · comparative prompt · first choice
“Celonis (Leader, highest in execution & vision) | Enterprise-scale analysis across systems (ERP, CRM); deep AI-driven insights” Grok 4.1 Fast · Process mining · comparative prompt · first choice
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“What to Avoid (Unless You Have the Budget) ... Celonis | $60K–$100K/year + $40K–$80K implementation | Case-volume pricing adds up fast; opaque enterprise sales” Kimi K2 · Process mining · direct prompt · hard negative
“What I would avoid on a limited budget: Celonis, IBM Process Mining, and similar enterprise suites” GPT-5.4 mini · Process mining · budget prompt · hard negative
“avoid enterprise-first tools like Celonis, which are often described as more expensive” Perplexity Sonar · Process mining · budget prompt · hard negative
“Tools like Celonis (average ~$418K/year) ... are far out of scope for most limited budgets” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Process mining · budget prompt · hard negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 183 of the 191 answers that named Celonis Process Intelligence Platform and are not a share of its labels.
677 of the 677 domain citations in answers naming Celonis Process Intelligence Platform came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-11 to 2026-10 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Glossary or explainer | 736 | undated | Process mining, PAM | ||
| Blog | 636 | undated | Process mining, RPA | ||
| News or press | 390 | undated | Process mining, ITSM | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 156 | undated | Process mining | ||
| Report or ebook | 103 | undated | Process mining | ||
| Conference or event | 72 | undated | Process mining | ||
| Comparison | 48 | undated | Process mining | ||
| Podcast or video | 33 | undated | Process mining | ||
| Case study | 30 | undated | Process mining, ITSM | ||
| Template or tool | 13 | 10 | 2026-08-31 |
As the event pages on celonis.com state them, read October 5, 2026.
Every page celonis.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What Celonis Process Intelligence Platform's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: celonis.com, trust.celonis.com, celonis.com/platform, celonis.com/get-started/customers, celonis.com/platform/marketplace. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Celonis Process Intelligence Platform's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Celonis Process Intelligence Platform, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Celonis Process Intelligence Platform by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows: