Four of fourteen models named Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining first on the direct prompt; two named Celonis Process Intelligence Platform. Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining was named by eleven of the fourteen models and Celonis Process Intelligence Platform by fourteen and Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining carries 21 labels and Celonis Process Intelligence Platform 64, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in one category this edition.
Named in one category this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the process mining page.
Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining and Celonis Process Intelligence Platform were named in the same answer fifty-six times, of the 62 answers naming Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining and the 191 naming Celonis Process Intelligence Platform. In those answers Celonis Process Intelligence Platform took the first choice fifteen times and Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining twenty-five.
| Model | DirectMP | ParaphraseMP | ComparativeMP | Budget-constrainedMP | Scale-constrainedMP | NegativeMP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | MP | |||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | MP | MP | MP | MP | MP | |
| Perplexity Sonar | MP | MP | MP | |||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | MP | |||||
| Mistral Small | MP | |||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | MP | MP | ||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | ||||||
| Kimi K2 | MP | MP | ||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | MP | |||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | MP | |||||
| GPT-6 Luna | MP | MP | MP | |||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | MP |
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of seven in this category shown.
“Avoid or be cautious with Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining if you expect high volumes” Mistral Small · negative prompt · hard negative
“I wouldn’t start with Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining if the budget is especially tight” GPT-6 Luna · budget prompt · soft negative
“it can carry heavy add-on licensing costs (such as a $5,000/month tenant capacity add-on)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“Best for Microsoft-Centric Companies: Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining ... this is the most seamless and cost-effective commercial option.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
“Best Overall & Best for Microsoft Ecosystems: Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining (formerly Minit)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · direct prompt · first choice
“UiPath Process Mining or Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining are the safest bets” DeepSeek V4 Flash · direct prompt · first choice
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“What to Avoid (Unless You Have the Budget) ... Celonis | $60K–$100K/year + $40K–$80K implementation | Case-volume pricing adds up fast; opaque enterprise sales” Kimi K2 · direct prompt · hard negative
“What I would avoid on a limited budget: Celonis, IBM Process Mining, and similar enterprise suites” GPT-5.4 mini · budget prompt · hard negative
“avoid enterprise-first tools like Celonis, which are often described as more expensive” Perplexity Sonar · budget prompt · hard negative
“The undisputed heavyweight market leader... If you have a highly complex, multi-vendor IT architecture and a large budget... Choose Celonis.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · comparative prompt · first choice
“Celonis — The Market Leader ... Key Differentiator: Deep execution management with AI-powered recommendations and the broadest ecosystem” Kimi K2 · comparative prompt · first choice
“Celonis remains the undisputed heavyweight, commanding a 31.2% market share through its sophisticated Execution Management System (EMS)” Claude Haiku 4.5 · comparative prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.