Index › IT operations and endpoint › Process mining › Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining vs SAP Signavio Process Intelligence

Process mining · October 2026 Edition

Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining vs SAP Signavio Process Intelligence

Four of fourteen models named Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining first on the direct prompt; zero named SAP Signavio Process Intelligence. Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining was named by eleven of the fourteen models and SAP Signavio Process Intelligence by fourteen and Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining carries 21 labels and SAP Signavio Process Intelligence 47, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining

accepted challenger

Named in one category this edition.

SAP Signavio Process Intelligence

criticized challenger

Named in one category this edition.

First-choice share14%3%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.

Negative rate14%30%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.

Rank in category#2#6A position in a field of 9; printed, not drawn.

Labels2147A count; the two differ.

The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.UiPath Process Mining was named alongside these two in nine of the fourteen direct answers. Apromore vs Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining · Apromore vs SAP Signavio Process Intelligence · Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining vs IBM Process Mining

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the process mining page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.

Microsoft Power Automate Process MiningFirst choices, of fourteen modelsSAP Signavio Process Intelligence

Direct404 against SAP Signavio Process Intelligence

Paraphrase122 against SAP Signavio Process Intelligence

Comparative02

Budget-constrained201 against Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining · 2 against SAP Signavio Process Intelligence

Scale-constrained101 against SAP Signavio Process Intelligence

Negative002 against Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining · 5 against SAP Signavio Process Intelligence

Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining and SAP Signavio Process Intelligence were named in the same answer forty-five times, of the 62 answers naming Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining and the 144 naming SAP Signavio Process Intelligence. In those answers SAP Signavio Process Intelligence took the first choice one time and Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining eighteen.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining and SAP Signavio Process Intelligence stood in it.

Model	DirectMPSS	ParaphraseMPSS	ComparativeMPSS	Budget-constrainedMPSS	Scale-constrainedMPSS	NegativeMPSS
Claude Haiku 4.5			MPSS			SS
GPT-5.4 mini	SS		SS
Gemini 3.5 Flash	MP	MPSS	MPSS	MPSS	SS	MPSS
Perplexity Sonar	MPSS		MPSS	MP
Grok 4.1 Fast	SS	SS	MPSS			SS
Mistral Small	SS	SS	SS			MP
DeepSeek V4 Flash	MPSS	SS	MPSS	SS	SS
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash	SS	SS	SS			SS
Kimi K2	MPSS	SS	SS		MPSS	SS
GLM 4.7 FlashX	SS	SS	MPSS
MiniMax M2.5	MP	SS	SS
GPT-6 Luna	SS	MPSS	MPSS	MP
Muse Glimmer 30B	MP		SS

MP Microsoft Power Automate Process MiningSS SAP Signavio Process IntelligenceMP first choiceMP named as an alternativeMP argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining on the left and SAP Signavio Process Intelligence on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining and SAP Signavio Process Intelligence stood in it.

Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining first, SAP Signavio Process Intelligence an alternative

4 of 14 modelsSAP Signavio Process Intelligence was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.

Gemini 3.5 FlashMicrosoft Power Automate Process Mining alternatives: Apromore, KYP.ai, UiPath Process Mining

Perplexity SonarMicrosoft Power Automate Process Mining alternatives: SAP Signavio Process Intelligence, UiPath Process Mining

DeepSeek V4 FlashMicrosoft Power Automate Process Mining, UiPath Process Mining alternatives: Mindzie, Minit, ProcessMind

Kimi K2Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining, Mindzie alternatives: Apromore, MEHRWERK, QPR ProcessAnalyzer

Neither was the first choice, one was named

6 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.

GPT-5.4 miniUiPath Process Mining alternatives: Celonis Process Intelligence Platform, SAP Signavio Process Intelligence

Mistral SmallCelonis Process Intelligence Platform alternatives: SAP Signavio Process Intelligence, UiPath Process Mining

Qwen 3.7 FlashEverflow Process Intelligence, ProcessMaker alternatives: SAP Signavio Process Intelligence, UiPath Process Mining

MiniMax M2.5Apromore, Celonis Process Intelligence Platform alternatives: IBM Process Mining, Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining, UiPath Process Mining

GPT-6 LunaApromore alternatives: Power Automate Process Mining, SAP Signavio Process Intelligence, UiPath Process Mining

Muse Glimmer 30BDecisions, ProcessMaker alternatives: Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining, Noxus

Neither was named

4 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.

Claude Haiku 4.5Microsoft Power Automate alternatives: Apromore, ProcessMind, QPR ProcessAnalyzer

Grok 4.1 FastMicrosoft Power Automate alternatives: Apromore, UiPath Process Mining

Llama 4 MaverickProcessMaker

GLM 4.7 FlashXMindzie alternatives: ABBYY Timeline, Apromore, Microsoft Power Automate

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.

Small business

Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining leads by eight points.

Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining#4 of 12

SAP Signavio Process Intelligence#12 of 12

The full small business standing →

Mid-marketThe figures above

Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining leads by ten points.

Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining#2 of 9

SAP Signavio Process Intelligence#6 of 9

The full mid-market standing →

Enterprise

Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining leads by thirteen points.

Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining#2 of 8

SAP Signavio Process Intelligence#3 of 8

The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of seven in this category shown.

“Avoid or be cautious with Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining if you expect high volumes” Mistral Small · negative prompt · hard negative

“I wouldn’t start with Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining if the budget is especially tight” GPT-6 Luna · budget prompt · soft negative

“it can carry heavy add-on licensing costs (such as a $5,000/month tenant capacity add-on)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative

“Best for Microsoft-Centric Companies: Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining ... this is the most seamless and cost-effective commercial option.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · budget prompt · first choice

“Best Overall & Best for Microsoft Ecosystems: Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining (formerly Minit)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · direct prompt · first choice

“UiPath Process Mining or Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining are the safest bets” DeepSeek V4 Flash · direct prompt · first choice

What the models said about SAP Signavio Process Intelligence

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.

“SAP Signavio | $150K–$700K/year | Heavy SAP-native positioning; enterprise price tags” Kimi K2 · direct prompt · hard negative

“SAP Signavio ($150K–$700K/year) are far out of scope for most limited budgets” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · hard negative

“$150K–$700K/year — only makes sense if you're deeply invested in SAP.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · direct prompt · hard negative

“If your stack is primarily SAP and you are planning a massive ERP migration: Choose SAP Signavio.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · comparative prompt · first choice

“SAP Signavio for SAP-aligned process mining + modelling + simulation with collaborative governance” Muse Glimmer 30B · comparative prompt · first choice

“### 1. SAP Signavio – *Best if you use SAP or need end-to-end modeling*” Qwen 3.7 Flash · paraphrase prompt · first choice

Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.