AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Products › PM4Py · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Ranked

PM4Py

27Judge labels
1First choices
6Negative labels
11 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
2% in Process mining for mid-market buyers
Rank 13 of 61 in the mid-market standingcriticized challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 29% of its 14 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of PM4Py →
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In process mining · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named PM4Py for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Process miningIT operations and endpoint2%13 of 6129%14criticized challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for PM4Py yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated PM4Py across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.501001
GPT-5.4 mini01001
Gemini 3.5 Flash01001
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast01001
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash01001
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash01012
Kimi K201012
GLM 4.7 FlashX01012
MiniMax M2.501001
GPT-6 Luna10012
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct2 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative4 labelsNone
Budget-constrained14 labels1
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative7 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative27 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Best low-budget starting point: PM4Py—if your company has someone comfortable with Python and data preparation.” GPT-6 Luna · Process mining · budget prompt · first choice
“If you have technical/data science resources, PM4Py offers the most power and flexibility at zero cost.” Kimi K2 · Process mining · budget prompt · alternative
“PM4Py is the leading open-source library for process mining in Python. It is completely free” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Process mining · budget prompt · alternative
“Completely free Python library for developers/data scientists... but requires coding—no GUI” Grok 4.1 Fast · Process mining · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“No graphical user interface – Requires programming knowledge and development skills” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Process mining · negative prompt · hard negative
“Open Source Tools (Avoid if You Don't Have Developers)” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Process mining · negative prompt · hard negative
“Open-source libraries such as PM4Py, if you expect a turnkey business app... a library may leave you responsible for building the interface” GPT-6 Luna · Process mining · negative prompt · soft negative
“No graphical user interface – difficult for non-technical organizational use” Kimi K2 · Process mining · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as PM4Py, over the 27 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and PM4Py was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
ProM13 of 270Not among the top eight
Fluxicon Disco8 of 270Not among the top eight
ProcessMind5 of 273Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named PM4Py. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 27 of the 27 answers that named PM4Py and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

processmind.com17
guideflow.com13
us.fitgap.com13
g2.com11
bardeen.ai10
github.com10
softwaresuggest.com10
erpresearch.com9
historytools.org9
learn.g2.com9

No domain is on file for PM4Py, so its own site is not marked.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

Where PM4Py stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Searches for its name, Google
140 a month (“pm4py”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
1 a month
Its own site
No site of its own on file, so no site figures

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
2%
rank 13 of 61 in process mining
Segment leader
19%
Apromore
First choices
1 across its categories
Named in
27 answers
Its own site cited
No site on file to match

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

Names read as PM4Py

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as PM4Py; a claim can dispute any of them.
PM4Py (Python library) 2

Follow PM4Py

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when PM4Py's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as PM4Py, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for PM4Py by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where PM4Py is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name PM4Py, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at the vendor's own domain is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.