Every category where a model named Mindzie for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Process mining	IT operations and endpoint	7%	5 of 61	11%	9	under 10 labels · led by Apromore at 19%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Mindzie yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Mindzie across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	0	0	0	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	1	0	1
Mistral Small	1	0	0	1	2
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	1	0	2
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	1	1	0	0	2
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	0	0	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct9 labels3

Paraphrase4 labels1

Comparative3 labels1not counted in share

Budget-constrained4 labels2

Scale-constrained3 labelsNone

Negative2 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative25 labels in all, every segment counted; 6 of the 7 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Start with Mindzie or Microsoft Power Automate if you want to prove ROI quickly without a massive upfront investment.” Kimi K2 · Process mining · direct prompt · first choice

“Best low-cost commercial option: mindzie (free plan available, paid plans start at a reasonable rate)” Mistral Small · Process mining · budget prompt · first choice

“Mindzie (Best Overall for Mid-Market Flexibility)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Process mining · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“Mindzie (Best for Mid-Market Focus)” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Process mining · direct prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“mindzie if you require enterprise-level scalability” Mistral Small · Process mining · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Mindzie, over the 25 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Mindzie was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Celonis Process Intelligence Platform19 of 250Not among the top eight

Apromore15 of 252Not among the top eight

SAP Signavio Process Intelligence14 of 250Not among the top eight

Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining11 of 254Not among the top eight

ProcessMind10 of 255Not among the top eight

UiPath Process Mining10 of 251Not among the top eight

Microsoft Power Automate8 of 252Not among the top eight

IBM Process Mining8 of 250Not among the top eight

Fluxicon Disco7 of 251Not among the top eight

PM4Py5 of 250Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Mindzie. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 25 of the 25 answers that named Mindzie and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

processmind.com18

guideflow.com16

bardeen.ai13

erpresearch.com12

g2.com12

superkind.ai12

learn.g2.com9

softwaresuggest.com8

sourceforge.net8

us.fitgap.com8

116 of the 116 domain citations in answers naming Mindzie came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

guideflow.com/blog/process-mining-tools16

processmind.com/resources/blog/the-best-process-mining-tools-of-202613

erpresearch.com/erp-add-ons/process-mining12

superkind.ai/blog/ai-process-mining-tools12

bardeen.ai/best/process-mining-tools11

learn.g2.com/best-process-mining-software9

softwaresuggest.com/process-mining-tools8

us.fitgap.com/search/process-mining-tools/small-business8

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

mindzie.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Mindzie takes 7% of first choices and Apromore takes 19%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “process mining tool”

–

not in the top ten

Position for “process mining tools”

–

not in the top ten

Searches for its name, Google: 30 a month (“mindzie”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 0 a month
Organic visits to its site: about 22 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 39 · 1 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 1,319
Paid Google search: No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none

Ads on Google

None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 5 of 61 in process mining

Segment leader

19%

Apromore

First choices: 6 across its categories
Named in: 25 answers
Its own site cited: in 25 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on mindzie.com

133

subdomains included

Content

counted in the table below

Documentation

Product · Integration

18 · 0

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	Latest	Categories named
Case study	23	undated		Process mining
Report or ebook	6	undated		Process mining
Comparison	4	1	2026-08-01	Process mining
Glossary or explainer	2	0	2024-12-01	Process mining

Most recent

2026-08-01Top 10 celonis alternatives for 2026 comparison
2025-01-01Cloud vs on premise why both still matter in 2025 comparison
2024-12-01What is process mining glossary or explainer
2024-03-01What is process mining and how are companies using it glossary or explainer
2022-06-01Process mining vs task mining comparison
2021-03-01Process mining vs business intelligence comparison

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page mindzie.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read October 5, 2026.

Names read as Mindzie

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Mindzie; a claim can dispute any of them.

mindzie 4

Follow Mindzie

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Mindzie is its own company.

ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Positioning: mindzie is the process intelligence platform that turns workflows into measurable and actionable insights.
mindzie.com
For: enterprise teams
mindzie.com
Price stated: custom pricing mindzie.com/pricing
Free plan or trial: Sign up for free; Get the free Desktop Edition; Create Your Free Account mindzie.com
Certifications: certification
Customers named: Colonial GroupLeavitt MachinerySierra WirelessMiddle Eastern conglomeratemajor regional bank
Not stated on the pages read: Starting price, integrations, hosting

What Mindzie's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: mindzie.com, mindzie.com/pricing, mindzie.com/platform, mindzie.com/case-studies, mindzie.com/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Mindzie's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Mindzie, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Mindzie by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Mindzie is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Mindzie, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.