AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Products › Apromore · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Ranked

Apromore

95Judge labels
17First choices
9Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
19% in Process mining for mid-market buyers
Rank 1 of 61 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
2 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 3% of its 37 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Apromore →
By buyer segmentStrongest at mid-market.
In process mining · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Apromore for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Process miningIT operations and endpoint19%1 of 613%37accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Apromore yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Apromore across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.511002
GPT-5.4 mini10001
Gemini 3.5 Flash24006
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast13105
Mistral Small10102
DeepSeek V4 Flash12003
Llama 4 Maverick01001
Qwen 3.7 Flash11002
Kimi K214016
GLM 4.7 FlashX02002
MiniMax M2.511002
GPT-6 Luna11103
Muse Glimmer 30B00202

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct15 labels2
Paraphrase8 labelsNone
Comparative29 labels6not counted in share
Budget-constrained20 labels14
Scale-constrained10 labels1
Negative13 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative95 labels in all, every segment counted; 17 of the 23 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Mid-Market & Agile Specialized Tools (e.g., Apromore, Fluxicon Disco, IBM Process Mining): Often much faster to implement, cost-effective” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Process mining · scale prompt · first choice
“I'd recommend starting with Apromore's free Community Edition if you have some technical capability” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Process mining · budget prompt · first choice
“For most budget-conscious companies, I'd recommend starting with Apromore Community Edition” Kimi K2 · Process mining · budget prompt · first choice
“My default pick: Apromore for a mid-market B2B company with a mixed systems landscape” GPT-6 Luna · Process mining · direct prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Limited compared to commercial version; requires technical expertise” Kimi K2 · Process mining · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Apromore, over the 95 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Apromore was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
ProcessMind18 of 955Not among the top eight
Fluxicon Disco16 of 954Not among the top eight
Mindzie15 of 953Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Apromore. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 93 of the 95 answers that named Apromore and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

processmind.com57
bardeen.ai40
erpresearch.com40
guideflow.com39
superkind.ai34
us.fitgap.com34
g2.com33
historytools.org31
learn.g2.com31
dupple.com27

366 of the 366 domain citations in answers naming Apromore came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

Where Apromore stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “process mining tool”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “process mining tools”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
590 a month (“apromore”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
9 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 227 a month
Searches its site ranks for
54 · 3 in the top three
Sites linking to it
909
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on Google
None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
19%
rank 1 of 61 in process mining
First choices
17
across its categories
Named in
95 answers
Its own site cited
in 93 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on apromore.com
322
subdomains included
Content
280
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
0 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-11 to 2026-10LatestCategories named
News or press130undatedProcess mining, RPA
Blog8702026-04-07Process mining, RPA
Webinar or virtual event2102024-07-23Process mining
Case study20undatedProcess mining
Report or ebook12undatedProcess mining
Conference or event7undatedProcess mining
Glossary or explainer202026-03-27Process mining
Comparison102025-03-10
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page apromore.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.

Names read as Apromore

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Apromore; a claim can dispute any of them.
Apromore (Community Edition) 2Apromore (Community) 1

Follow Apromore

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Apromore is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
Full Spectrum Process Intelligence Platform
For
business users
Price stated
Our flexible pricing enables a value-driven pathway and lower Total Cost of Ownership for process intellgeince adoption. apromore.com
Free plan or trial
free 30-day trial apromore.com/compliance
Customers named
AssurantInailKomatsuLeonardoNext Era EnergyOshkoshOriginUniversity of Melbourne
Not stated on the pages read
Starting price, integrations, certifications, hosting

What Apromore's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: apromore.com, apromore.com/compliance, apromore.com/case-studies. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Apromore's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Apromore, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Apromore by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Apromore is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Apromore, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at apromore.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.

Badges

Wins only: a badge exists where Apromore is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.
ShowHide

AI models recommend Apromore first in Process mining this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.

Wide · 320 × 104 Website, beside other badges
AI models' first choice in Process mining, October 2026 Edition, IT AI Recommendation Index
Show the code
<a href="https://it-ai-index.com/operations/process-mining/"><img src="https://it-ai-index.com/badges/2026-10/apromore--process-mining-wide.svg" alt="AI models' first choice in Process mining, October 2026 Edition, IT AI Recommendation Index" width="320" height="104"></a>

Copy the code as it is. The link is part of the badge: it points at the Process mining standing, where the claim can be checked.

Square · 240 × 240 LinkedIn, slides
AI models' first choice in Process mining, October 2026 Edition, IT AI Recommendation Index
Show the code
<a href="https://it-ai-index.com/operations/process-mining/"><img src="https://it-ai-index.com/badges/2026-10/apromore--process-mining-square.svg" alt="AI models' first choice in Process mining, October 2026 Edition, IT AI Recommendation Index" width="240" height="240"></a>

Copy the code as it is. The link is part of the badge: it points at the Process mining standing, where the claim can be checked.

Compact · 200 × 56 Email signature, footer
AI models' first choice in Process mining, October 2026 Edition, IT AI Recommendation Index
Show the code
<a href="https://it-ai-index.com/operations/process-mining/"><img src="https://it-ai-index.com/badges/2026-10/apromore--process-mining-compact.svg" alt="AI models' first choice in Process mining, October 2026 Edition, IT AI Recommendation Index" width="200" height="56"></a>

Copy the code as it is. The link is part of the badge: it points at the Process mining standing, where the claim can be checked.

Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.