AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › IT operations and endpoint › Process mining › Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining vs IBM Process Mining
Process mining · October 2026 Edition

Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining vs IBM Process Mining

Four of fourteen models named Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining first on the direct prompt; zero named IBM Process Mining. Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining was named by eleven of the fourteen models and IBM Process Mining by fourteen and Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining carries 21 labels and IBM Process Mining 37, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining

accepted challenger

Named in one category this edition.

IBM Process Mining

criticized challenger

Named in one category this edition.

First-choice share14%14%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate14%27%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#2#3A position in a field of 9; printed, not drawn.
Labels2137A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.UiPath Process Mining was named alongside these two in nine of the fourteen direct answers. Apromore vs Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining · Apromore vs IBM Process Mining · Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining vs UiPath Process Mining

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the process mining page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
Microsoft Power Automate Process MiningFirst choices, of fourteen modelsIBM Process Mining
Direct401 against IBM Process Mining
Paraphrase17
Comparative00
Budget-constrained201 against Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining · 2 against IBM Process Mining
Scale-constrained11
Negative002 against Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining · 7 against IBM Process Mining
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining and IBM Process Mining were named in the same answer thirty-seven times, of the 62 answers naming Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining and the 107 naming IBM Process Mining. In those answers IBM Process Mining took the first choice one time and Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining fourteen.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining and IBM Process Mining stood in it.
ModelDirectMPIPParaphraseMPIPComparativeMPIPBudget-constrainedMPIPScale-constrainedMPIPNegativeMPIP
Claude Haiku 4.5MPIPIP
GPT-5.4 miniIP
Gemini 3.5 FlashMPMPMPIPMPIPMPIP
Perplexity SonarMPIPMPMP
Grok 4.1 FastIPMPIPIP
Mistral SmallIPMPIP
DeepSeek V4 FlashMPIPIPMPIPIP
Llama 4 MaverickIP
Qwen 3.7 FlashIPIPIP
Kimi K2MPIPMPIPIP
GLM 4.7 FlashXMPIP
MiniMax M2.5MPIPIPIP
GPT-6 LunaMPMPMP
Muse Glimmer 30BMPIPIPIP
MP Microsoft Power Automate Process MiningIP IBM Process MiningMP first choiceMP named as an alternativeMP argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining on the left and IBM Process Mining on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining and IBM Process Mining stood in it.

Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining first, IBM Process Mining not the choice

4 of 14 modelsIBM Process Mining was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Gemini 3.5 FlashMicrosoft Power Automate Process Mining alternatives: Apromore, KYP.ai, UiPath Process Mining
Perplexity SonarMicrosoft Power Automate Process Mining alternatives: SAP Signavio Process Intelligence, UiPath Process Mining
DeepSeek V4 FlashMicrosoft Power Automate Process Mining, UiPath Process Mining alternatives: Mindzie, Minit, ProcessMind
Kimi K2Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining, Mindzie alternatives: Apromore, MEHRWERK, QPR ProcessAnalyzer

Neither was the first choice, one was named

2 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
MiniMax M2.5Apromore, Celonis Process Intelligence Platform alternatives: IBM Process Mining, Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining, UiPath Process Mining
Muse Glimmer 30BDecisions, ProcessMaker alternatives: Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining, Noxus

Neither was named

8 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Claude Haiku 4.5Microsoft Power Automate alternatives: Apromore, ProcessMind, QPR ProcessAnalyzer
GPT-5.4 miniUiPath Process Mining alternatives: Celonis Process Intelligence Platform, SAP Signavio Process Intelligence
Grok 4.1 FastMicrosoft Power Automate alternatives: Apromore, UiPath Process Mining
Mistral SmallCelonis Process Intelligence Platform alternatives: SAP Signavio Process Intelligence, UiPath Process Mining
Llama 4 MaverickProcessMaker
Qwen 3.7 FlashEverflow Process Intelligence, ProcessMaker alternatives: SAP Signavio Process Intelligence, UiPath Process Mining
GLM 4.7 FlashXMindzie alternatives: ABBYY Timeline, Apromore, Microsoft Power Automate
GPT-6 LunaApromore alternatives: Power Automate Process Mining, SAP Signavio Process Intelligence, UiPath Process Mining

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining leads by six points.
Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining8%#4 of 12
IBM Process Mining2%#10 of 12
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
Level: the same share of first choices.
Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining14%#2 of 9
IBM Process Mining14%#3 of 9
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining leads by sixteen points.
Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining20%#2 of 8
IBM Process Mining4%#4 of 8
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of seven in this category shown.

“Avoid or be cautious with Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining if you expect high volumes” Mistral Small · negative prompt · hard negative
“I wouldn’t start with Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining if the budget is especially tight” GPT-6 Luna · budget prompt · soft negative
“it can carry heavy add-on licensing costs (such as a $5,000/month tenant capacity add-on)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“Best for Microsoft-Centric Companies: Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining ... this is the most seamless and cost-effective commercial option.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
“Best Overall & Best for Microsoft Ecosystems: Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining (formerly Minit)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · direct prompt · first choice
“UiPath Process Mining or Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining are the safest bets” DeepSeek V4 Flash · direct prompt · first choice

What the models said about IBM Process Mining

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.

“What I would avoid on a limited budget: Celonis, IBM Process Mining, and similar enterprise suites” GPT-5.4 mini · budget prompt · hard negative
“~$4,250/month and enterprise-governance-focused — overkill for most mid-market teams.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · direct prompt · hard negative
“IBM Process Mining starts at ~$4,250/month — still expensive for SMBs” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · hard negative
“I would recommend IBM Process Mining if you want a process intelligence platform that is explicitly described as *tailored more to midsize organizations*” Perplexity Sonar · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“For most mid-sized B2B companies, IBM Process Mining or SAP Signavio are the best recommendations.” Mistral Small · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Mid-Market & Agile Specialized Tools (e.g., Apromore, Fluxicon Disco, IBM Process Mining)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · scale prompt · first choice
Also compared
Apromore vs Microsoft Power Automate Process MiningApromore vs IBM Process MiningMicrosoft Power Automate Process Mining vs UiPath Process MiningMicrosoft Power Automate Process Mining vs Microsoft Power AutomateMicrosoft Power Automate Process Mining vs SAP Signavio Process IntelligenceMicrosoft Power Automate Process Mining vs Celonis Process Intelligence PlatformMicrosoft Power Automate Process Mining vs PM4PyIBM Process Mining vs UiPath Process MiningIBM Process Mining vs Microsoft Power AutomateIBM Process Mining vs SAP Signavio Process IntelligenceIBM Process Mining vs Celonis Process Intelligence PlatformIBM Process Mining vs PM4PyAll twenty-eight head-to-head pages and the full process mining standing

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.