AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Products › ProcessMind · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Ranked

ProcessMind

40Judge labels
12First choices
0Negative labels
12 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
23% in Process mining for small business buyers
Rank 11 of 61 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 8 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentStrongest at small business.
In process mining · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named ProcessMind for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Process miningIT operations and endpoint2%11 of 610%8under 10 labels · led by Apromore at 19%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for ProcessMind yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated ProcessMind across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.501001
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar01001
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash11103
Llama 4 Maverick01102
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B01001

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct7 labels3
Paraphrase8 labels4
Comparative6 labels2not counted in share
Budget-constrained9 labels4
Scale-constrained7 labels1
Negative3 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative40 labels in all, every segment counted; 12 of the 14 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“or ProcessMind's free/entry-tier plan (€24.65/month) if you want a polished, user-friendly commercial product at minimal cost” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Process mining · budget prompt · first choice
“ProcessMind and Bizagi are also positioned as affordable SMB-friendly options” Perplexity Sonar · Process mining · budget prompt · alternative
“Need a supported freemium with minimal spend → ProcessMind free plan” Muse Glimmer 30B · Process mining · budget prompt · alternative
“This platform allows users to model, mine, and improve processes” Llama 4 Maverick · Process mining · paraphrase prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as ProcessMind, over the 40 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and ProcessMind was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Celonis Process Intelligence Platform28 of 403Not among the top eight
SAP Signavio Process Intelligence20 of 400Not among the top eight
Apromore18 of 403Not among the top eight
UiPath Process Mining18 of 401Not among the top eight
Microsoft Power Automate15 of 405Not among the top eight
IBM Process Mining13 of 401Not among the top eight
Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining11 of 405Not among the top eight
Bizagi10 of 401Not among the top eight
Mindzie10 of 400Not among the top eight
Fluxicon Disco9 of 402Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named ProcessMind. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 40 of the 40 answers that named ProcessMind and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

processmind.comYour site33
bardeen.ai23
learn.g2.com22
guideflow.com21
g2.com19
itechguides.com15
softwaresuggest.com14
erpresearch.com13
processminingpro.com13
thectoclub.com13

153 of the 186 domain citations in answers naming ProcessMind came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

processmind.com ranks 4 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, ProcessMind takes 2% of first choices and Apromore takes 19%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “process mining tool”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “process mining tools”
4
Searches for its name, Google
20 a month (“processmind”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
0 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 750 a month
Searches its site ranks for
493 · 17 in the top three
Sites linking to it
614
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
1 ads · 1 image · 0 shown in the last 30 days

First shown May 2025, as ProcessMind, verified.

On Google's pages: 1

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
2%
rank 11 of 61 in process mining
Segment leader
19%
Apromore
First choices
12 across its categories
Named in
40 answers
Its own site cited
in 40 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on processmind.com
8,322
subdomains included
Content
72
counted in the table below
Documentation
171
Product · Integration
41 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-11 to 2026-10LatestCategories named
Blog3942026-08-25Process mining, EA tools
Glossary or explainer1702026-03-26Process mining, RPA
Comparison1262026-09-17Process mining
News or press312026-09-23Process mining
Template or tool1undatedProcess mining
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page processmind.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read October 5, 2026.

Follow ProcessMind

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

ProcessMind is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
Process mining software for mapping, analyzing, and improving operations. BPMN modeling, process architecture, dashboards, and simulation in one platform.
For
Built for business teams, not just data scientists or AI specialists.
Price stated
Process Foundation Starting at €24.65 /mo; Process Architecture Starting at €84.15 /mo; Process Intelligence Starting at €254.15 /mo processmind.com
Starting price
€24.65 /mo processmind.com
Free plan or trial
Try ProcessMind free for 14 days. No credit card required. processmind.com
Certifications
GDPR compliance
Hosting
the EU
Not stated on the pages read
Integrations, customers

What ProcessMind's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: processmind.com, processmind.com/platform, processmind.com/about/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when ProcessMind's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as ProcessMind, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for ProcessMind by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where ProcessMind is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name ProcessMind, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at processmind.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.