| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Process mining | IT operations and endpoint | 2% | 11 of 61 | 0% | 8 | under 10 labels · led by Apromore at 19% |
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“or ProcessMind's free/entry-tier plan (€24.65/month) if you want a polished, user-friendly commercial product at minimal cost” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Process mining · budget prompt · first choice
“ProcessMind and Bizagi are also positioned as affordable SMB-friendly options” Perplexity Sonar · Process mining · budget prompt · alternative
“Need a supported freemium with minimal spend → ProcessMind free plan” Muse Glimmer 30B · Process mining · budget prompt · alternative
“This platform allows users to model, mine, and improve processes” Llama 4 Maverick · Process mining · paraphrase prompt · alternative
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 40 of the 40 answers that named ProcessMind and are not a share of its labels.
153 of the 186 domain citations in answers naming ProcessMind came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
First shown May 2025, as ProcessMind, verified.
On Google's pages: 1
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-11 to 2026-10 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 39 | 4 | 2026-08-25 | Process mining, EA tools | |
| Glossary or explainer | 17 | 0 | 2026-03-26 | Process mining, RPA | |
| Comparison | 12 | 6 | 2026-09-17 | Process mining | |
| News or press | 3 | 1 | 2026-09-23 | Process mining | |
| Template or tool | 1 | undated | Process mining |
Every page processmind.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read October 5, 2026.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What ProcessMind's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: processmind.com, processmind.com/platform, processmind.com/about/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when ProcessMind's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as ProcessMind, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for ProcessMind by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows: