AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Products › Jamf · October 2026 Edition
5 categories · Ranked

Jamf

144Judge labels
1First choices
27Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
5Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
2% in UEM for mid-market buyers
Rank 8 of 53 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 12% of its 41 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Jamf →
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In uem · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Jamf for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Unified endpoint managementIT operations and endpoint2%8 of 5312%41accepted challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Microsoft 365 managementIT operations and endpoint0%52 of 1490%2under 10 labels · led by CoreView at 20%
Patch managementIT operations and endpoint0%24 of 850%2under 10 labels · led by ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus at 29%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
IT asset managementIT operations and endpoint0%53 of 820%1under 10 labels · led by Freshservice at 31%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Remote monitoring and managementIT operations and endpoint0%33 of 620%1under 10 labels · led by NinjaOne at 47%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.

Movement

Since September 2026, Jamf held within the floor in all five categories: no change cleared 11 points.

Best category · UEM · by segment

Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 11 → 49 of 53
Mid-market▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 10 → 8 of 48
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 5 of 53, unchanged

All categories · Mid-market

CategorySeptember 2026NowChangeReadingRank
UEM0%2%▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 10 → 8 of 53
M365 management0%0%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.New this editionRank 52 of 149, unchanged
Patching0%0%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.New this editionRank 24 of 85, unchanged
ITAM0%0%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 36 → 53 of 82
RMM0%0%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.New this editionRank 33 of 62, unchanged

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated Jamf across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500123
GPT-5.4 mini05016
Gemini 3.5 Flash13206
Perplexity Sonar00101
Grok 4.2003014
Mistral Small02002
DeepSeek V4 Flash03003
Llama 4 Maverick00202
Qwen 3.7 Flash01203
Kimi K203003
GLM 4.7 FlashX02305
MiniMax M2.502002
GPT-6 Luna02002
Muse Glimmer 30B02215

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct18 labelsNone
Paraphrase34 labelsNone
Comparative30 labelsNone
Budget-constrained12 labelsNone
Scale-constrained25 labels1
Negative25 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative144 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Top Picks: Jamf Pro or Kandji ... Jamf is the historical gold standard” Gemini 3.5 Flash · UEM · scale prompt · first choice
“mostly Apple devices, Jamf can be a better fit, but it is often more specialized than budget-focused” GPT-5.4 mini · UEM · budget prompt · alternative
“Gold standard for Apple (same-day OS support, deep scripting). | Apple-only; pricier for non-Apple.” Grok 4.20 · UEM · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“Consider using OS-native tools (like Microsoft Intune, WSUS, Jamf, or Linux's unattended-upgrades)” Mistral Small · Patching · negative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“most directly suited to Apple-centric environments rather than organizations seeking one UEM platform for a broad mix of operating systems” Claude Haiku 4.5 · UEM · comparative prompt · soft negative
“If you are Apple-heavy, Jamf is praised for app deployment and security baselines, but it is Apple-focused” Muse Glimmer 30B · UEM · direct prompt · soft negative
“The complete absence of Windows and Android support makes it a non-starter for mixed OS environments” Claude Haiku 4.5 · UEM · negative prompt · soft negative
“Quote-only vendors (e.g., Jamf, some Ivanti tiers) hide TCO bombs” Grok 4.20 · UEM · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Jamf, over the 141 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Jamf was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Omnissa Workspace ONE90 of 1415Not among the top eight
Ivanti Neurons for UEM67 of 1410Not among the top eight
IBM MaaS36038 of 1410Not among the top eight
Hexnode UEM33 of 1410Not among the top eight
Scalefusion25 of 1412Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Jamf. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 131 of the 141 answers that named Jamf and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

venn.com58
guideflow.com56
syncrosecure.com47
miradore.com46
manageengine.com39
ciopages.com36
gbhackers.com35
cdn-dynmedia-1.microsoft.com34
g2.com34
cybersecuritynews.com33

418 of the 418 domain citations in answers naming Jamf came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

jamf.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Jamf takes 2% of first choices and Microsoft Intune takes 39%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “unified endpoint management platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “unified endpoint management platforms”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
22,200 a month (“jamf”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
1,681 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 93,863 a month
Searches its site ranks for
22,138 · 1,228 in the top three
Sites linking to it
16,050
Paid Google search
1 searches its ads show for, about 2 clicks and $74 a month (estimate)
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
108 ads · 108 text · 47 shown in the last 30 days

First shown November 2022, as JAMF Software, LLC, verified. Ads started 2025-10 to 2026-09: 60 in the year, 48 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
2%
rank 8 of 53 in UEM
Segment leader
39%
Microsoft Intune
First choices
1 across its categories
Named in
141 answers
Its own site cited
in 131 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on jamf.com
11,029
subdomains included
Content
4,251
counted in the table below
Documentation
926
Product · Integration
32 · 14
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Blog2,30942026-09-24ZTNA, Endpoint protection
Podcast or video1,064152026-08-25Patching, ZTNA
Report or ebook349undatedZTNA, UEM
Case study211undated
News or press16312026-09-24Endpoint protection, UEM
Glossary or explainer4202025-08-12ZTNA, SIEM
Conference or event40undated
Webinar or virtual event3612026-09-28
Comparison2102026-05-28ZTNA, UEM
Template or tool1602024-04-11

Most recent

Events in person

Last twelve months

As the event pages on jamf.com state them, read September 28, 2026.

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page jamf.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Of its titles that name a category, most name ZTNA (26); 28 name its categories the models place it in. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Names read as Jamf

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Jamf; a claim can dispute any of them.
Jamf Pro 24JAMF Pro 1Jamf Pro (Jamf) 1Jamf Pro/Now 1

Follow Jamf

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Jamf is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
We help organizations succeed with Apple.
For
organizations
Price stated
Free, 14-day Jamf trial jamf.com/blog/security
Free plan or trial
Free, 14-day Jamf trial jamf.com
Integrations claimed
2 jamf.com/blog/security
Customers named
National GeographicSAPSquirrelSiemensBarratt HomesatVenuPallet Service CorporationAbbeydale
Not stated on the pages read
Starting price, certifications, hosting

What Jamf's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: jamf.com, jamf.com/pricing, jamf.com/blog/security, jamf.com/products, jamf.com/resources/case-studies. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Jamf's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Jamf, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Jamf by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Jamf is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Jamf, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at jamf.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.