| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unified endpoint management | IT operations and endpoint | 0% | 16 of 53 | 36% | 42 | criticized challenger | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Application shielding | Developer platform | 0% | 55 of 87 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Appdome at 33% |
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UEM | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 33 → 16 of 53 |
| App shielding | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 55 of 87, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 4 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 6 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 4 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Workspace ONE remains a top leader in the enterprise space.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · UEM · comparative prompt · first choice
“Microsoft Intune and VMware (Broadcom) Workspace ONE often lead in recent IDC/Gartner-like reports for execution/vision” Grok 4.20 · UEM · scale prompt · alternative
“achieved the highest scores across Gartner's 2026 Use Cases ... It is positioned as a leader for all-OS + VDI estates.” Muse Glimmer 30B · UEM · comparative prompt · alternative
“e.g., Microsoft Intune, VMware Workspace ONE, CrowdStrike) rather than lightweight obfuscation tools” Qwen 3.7 Flash · App shielding · negative prompt · alternative
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Omnissa/Workspace ONE – vendor instability and support collapse” DeepSeek V4 Flash · UEM · negative prompt · hard negative
“The trade-off is complexity. Workspace ONE rewards organizations with a dedicated team to configure and maintain it, and it can feel like a lot for a small shop.” Muse Glimmer 30B · UEM · direct prompt · soft negative
“Omnissa as a strong cross-platform option but note that its status as a newly independent vendor can make the roadmap a topic of discussion” Perplexity Sonar · UEM · negative prompt · soft negative
“Exercise caution. If you are an existing on-premises customer, you are facing a forced, complex cloud migration.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · UEM · negative prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 133 of the 149 answers that named Omnissa Workspace ONE and are not a share of its labels.
452 of the 452 domain citations in answers naming Omnissa Workspace ONE came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What Omnissa Workspace ONE's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: omnissa.com/omnissa-one, omnissa.com/workspace-one-uem-ios-ebook, developer.omnissa.com/workspace-one-uem-apis, omnissa.com/workspace-one-modern-management, omnissa.com/workspace-one-DEX-solution-brief. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Omnissa Workspace ONE's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Omnissa Workspace ONE, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Omnissa Workspace ONE by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows: