| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unified endpoint management | IT operations and endpoint | 0% | 15 of 53 | 25% | 32 | criticized challenger | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UEM | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 17 → 15 of 53 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 4 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“lead for large enterprises seeking AI‑driven automation, comprehensive security, and broad cross‑platform coverage” GLM 4.7 FlashX · UEM · comparative prompt · alternative
“AI-driven UEM with self-healing endpoint automation and ITSM integration for mid-to-large enterprises and MSPs” Claude Haiku 4.5 · UEM · direct prompt · alternative
“Positioned for organizations consolidating endpoint management and security under one automation platform” Muse Glimmer 30B · UEM · comparative prompt · alternative
“Ivanti tends to stand out when teams want UEM tied closely to patching, remediation, workflow automation” GPT-5.4 mini · UEM · comparative prompt · alternative
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Some models explicitly label Ivanti as a platform to avoid unless there is a specific, well-justified fit.” Mistral Small · UEM · negative prompt · hard negative
“Ivanti products have featured in multiple CISA known exploited vulnerabilities advisories in recent years” Claude Haiku 4.5 · UEM · negative prompt · hard negative
“Avoid Ivanti unless you have a highly dedicated security operations team” Gemini 3.5 Flash · UEM · negative prompt · hard negative
“Risk level: High – avoid starting new projects unless forced” DeepSeek V4 Flash · UEM · negative prompt · hard negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 98 of the 101 answers that named Ivanti Neurons for UEM and are not a share of its labels.
373 of the 373 domain citations in answers naming Ivanti Neurons for UEM came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What Ivanti Neurons for UEM's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: ivanti.com/promo/experience-uem, advantagelearning.ivanti.com/bundles/unified-endpoint-management-1, advantagelearning.ivanti.com/bundles/unified-endpoint-management-2025, advantagelearning.ivanti.com/pages/unified-endpoint-management-subscription, advantagelearning.ivanti.com/courses/ivanti-unified-endpoint-manager-certification. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Ivanti Neurons for UEM's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Ivanti Neurons for UEM, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Ivanti Neurons for UEM by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows: