Every category where a model named Ivanti Neurons for UEM for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Unified endpoint management	IT operations and endpoint	0%	16 of 52	20%	5	under 10 labels · led by Microsoft Intune at 43%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Ivanti Neurons for UEM yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Ivanti Neurons for UEM across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	0	1
Perplexity Sonar	1	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	0	1
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	1	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct3 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative10 labelsNone

Budget-constrained2 labelsNone

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative4 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative20 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Best For: Organizations aiming for AI-driven "self-healing" automation and heavy workflow orchestration.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · UEM · comparative prompt · alternative

“Often chosen for automation, policy-driven configuration, and ITSM integration rather than simplicity.” Perplexity Sonar · UEM · comparative prompt · alternative

“serves as a bridge option for mid-to-large organizations” Claude Haiku 4.5 · UEM · direct prompt · alternative

“Strong legacy Windows/patch management” Grok 4.1 Fast · UEM · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Why to be cautious: User reviews highlight significant usability friction.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · UEM · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Ivanti Neurons for UEM, over the 20 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Ivanti Neurons for UEM was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Omnissa Workspace ONE19 of 202Not in the top three

Microsoft Intune18 of 2016Not in the top three

ManageEngine Endpoint Central16 of 201Not in the top three

Jamf15 of 200Not in the top three

IBM MaaS3606 of 200Not in the top three

NinjaOne5 of 200Not in the top three

42Gears SureMDM4 of 200Not in the top three

Hexnode UEM4 of 200Not in the top three

SOTI MobiControl4 of 200Not in the top three

Scalefusion4 of 200Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Ivanti Neurons for UEM. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 16 of the 20 answers that named Ivanti Neurons for UEM and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

gbhackers.com12

cyberpress.org11

cybersecuritynews.com10

expertinsights.com10

peerspot.com8

checkthat.ai7

zecurit.com7

ciopages.com6

g2.com6

gartner.com6

Eighty-three of the eighty-three domain citations in answers naming Ivanti Neurons for UEM came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

gbhackers.com/best-uem-solutions-compared12

cyberpress.org/uem-solutions-by-business-size11

expertinsights.com/it-management/the-top-unified-endpoint-management-uem-solutions10

checkthat.ai/answers/what-is-the-best-endpoint-management-software7

cybersecuritynews.com/best-uem-solutions/amp7

ciopages.com/buyer-guides/endpoint-management-uem6

cybersecuritynews.com/best-uem-solutions6

syncrosecure.com/blog/unified-endpoint-management-tools6

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Ivanti Neurons for UEM

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Ivanti Neurons for UEM; a claim can dispute any of them.

Ivanti Neurons for Unified Endpoint Management 1Ivanti UEM 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Ivanti Neurons for UEM's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Ivanti Neurons for UEM, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at ivanti.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.