Every category where a model named Hexnode UEM for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Unified endpoint management	IT operations and endpoint	0%	12 of 52	6%	16	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Hexnode UEM yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Hexnode UEM across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	1	0	2
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	3	0	0	3
Perplexity Sonar	1	0	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	0	0	1
Mistral Small	0	1	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	4	0	4
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	1	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	0	0	1
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	2	0	0	2
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct9 labels1

Paraphrase10 labels1

Comparative11 labels1not counted in share

Budget-constrained15 labels1

Scale-constrained10 labelsNone

Negative12 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative67 labels in all, every segment counted; 3 of the 4 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“The Budget Champion: Hexnode (by ManageEngine)... Offers a lot of features... at a very competitive price point.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · UEM · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“perfect for small businesses or teams with limited budgets, and the customer support is highly appreciated” Claude Haiku 4.5 · UEM · budget prompt · alternative

“you must begin migrating to a replacement (such as Hexnode UEM or Scalefusion) immediately” GLM 4.7 FlashX · UEM · negative prompt · alternative

“frequently recommended for kiosk, BYOD, retail, and education scenarios” Perplexity Sonar · UEM · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“may not be the best option for organizations with a diverse device ecosystem” Llama 4 Maverick · UEM · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Hexnode UEM, over the 67 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Hexnode UEM was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Microsoft Intune63 of 6732Not in the top three

Jamf38 of 670Not in the top three

ManageEngine Endpoint Central36 of 674Not in the top three

Omnissa Workspace ONE34 of 671Not in the top three

Miradore32 of 6714Not in the top three

JumpCloud29 of 674Not in the top three

NinjaOne29 of 670Not in the top three

Scalefusion24 of 671Not in the top three

Mosyle16 of 670Not in the top three

IBM MaaS36013 of 670Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Hexnode UEM. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 53 of the 67 answers that named Hexnode UEM and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

syncrosecure.com37

gbhackers.com32

cyberpress.org30

expertinsights.com30

cybersecuritynews.com28

miradore.com28

superops.com28

softwareadvice.com20

venn.com20

g2.com18

271 of the 271 domain citations in answers naming Hexnode UEM came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

syncrosecure.com/blog/unified-endpoint-management-tools37

cyberpress.org/uem-solutions-by-business-size27

expertinsights.com/it-management/the-top-unified-endpoint-management-uem-solutions26

gbhackers.com/best-uem-solutions-compared26

miradore.com/blog/best-unified-endpoint-management-tools26

superops.com/uem/best-uem-software24

softwareadvice.com/unified-endpoint-management19

cybersecuritynews.com/best-uem-solutions/amp15

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Hexnode UEM

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Hexnode UEM; a claim can dispute any of them.

Hexnode 7Hexnode (by ManageEngine) 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Hexnode UEM's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Hexnode UEM, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at hexnode.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.